Cytotoxicity evaluation of medical gloves prepared by ‘safe’ accelerators, diisopropyl xanthogen polysulfide (DIXP) and zinc diisononyl dithiocarbamate (ZDNC)
Rhun Yian Koh, Isaac Jia Hao Teoh, Hannah Ru Chyong Chiang, Nelson Kim Soon Ong, Yong Qi Leong, Siang Yin Lee, Anna Pick Kiong Ling
{"title":"Cytotoxicity evaluation of medical gloves prepared by ‘safe’ accelerators, diisopropyl xanthogen polysulfide (DIXP) and zinc diisononyl dithiocarbamate (ZDNC)","authors":"Rhun Yian Koh, Isaac Jia Hao Teoh, Hannah Ru Chyong Chiang, Nelson Kim Soon Ong, Yong Qi Leong, Siang Yin Lee, Anna Pick Kiong Ling","doi":"10.1007/s42464-025-00319-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Latex allergies are caused by latex protein and the chemicals such as accelerators added during the manufacturing of its products. Cytotoxicity and hypersensitivity type I and type IV reactions are the common clinical manifestations of natural rubber latex (NRL). The study is to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of medical gloves prepared by diisopropyl xanthogen polysulfide (DIXP) and zinc diisononyl dithiocarbamate (ZDNC), which are claimed to be safer than conventional accelerators towards HaCat cells. Gloves prepared with varying concentrations of DIXP and ZDNC were subjected to cytotoxic tests, specifically agar overlay assay, filter diffusion test and MTT test, which HaCat Cell lines were used as the in vitro model. The tests showed that all the gloves prepared with DIXP (1.0, 1.2 and 1.5 phr) shows mild cytotoxicity while the gloves prepared with 1.0 phr of ZDNC has no cytotoxic effect in the agar overlay and filter diffusion tests. However, gloves prepared with 1.2 and 1.5 phr of ZDNC showed mild cytotoxicity in both tests. As for the MTT test, both DIXP and ZDNC gloves regardless of the concentration, showed a steady cell viability above 80% before decreasing to less than 20% at higher concentrations of 50% and 100% of sample concentration prepared by two-fold serial dilution. Taken together, the results suggest that ZDNC is a more viable and safer alternative for replacing conventional accelerators. Further testing is necessary to confirm the cytotoxicity of ZDNC particularly at a concentration not exceeding 1.0 phr.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rubber Research","volume":"28 4","pages":"535 - 545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rubber Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42464-025-00319-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Latex allergies are caused by latex protein and the chemicals such as accelerators added during the manufacturing of its products. Cytotoxicity and hypersensitivity type I and type IV reactions are the common clinical manifestations of natural rubber latex (NRL). The study is to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of medical gloves prepared by diisopropyl xanthogen polysulfide (DIXP) and zinc diisononyl dithiocarbamate (ZDNC), which are claimed to be safer than conventional accelerators towards HaCat cells. Gloves prepared with varying concentrations of DIXP and ZDNC were subjected to cytotoxic tests, specifically agar overlay assay, filter diffusion test and MTT test, which HaCat Cell lines were used as the in vitro model. The tests showed that all the gloves prepared with DIXP (1.0, 1.2 and 1.5 phr) shows mild cytotoxicity while the gloves prepared with 1.0 phr of ZDNC has no cytotoxic effect in the agar overlay and filter diffusion tests. However, gloves prepared with 1.2 and 1.5 phr of ZDNC showed mild cytotoxicity in both tests. As for the MTT test, both DIXP and ZDNC gloves regardless of the concentration, showed a steady cell viability above 80% before decreasing to less than 20% at higher concentrations of 50% and 100% of sample concentration prepared by two-fold serial dilution. Taken together, the results suggest that ZDNC is a more viable and safer alternative for replacing conventional accelerators. Further testing is necessary to confirm the cytotoxicity of ZDNC particularly at a concentration not exceeding 1.0 phr.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rubber Research is devoted to both natural and synthetic rubbers, as well as to related disciplines. The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of rubber from the core disciplines of biology, physics and chemistry, as well as economics. As a specialised field, rubber science includes within its niche a vast potential of innovative and value-added research areas yet to be explored. This peer reviewed publication focuses on the results of active experimental research and authoritative reviews on all aspects of rubber science.
The Journal of Rubber Research welcomes research on:
the upstream, including crop management, crop improvement and protection, and biotechnology;
the midstream, including processing and effluent management;
the downstream, including rubber engineering and product design, advanced rubber technology, latex science and technology, and chemistry and materials exploratory;
economics, including the economics of rubber production, consumption, and market analysis.
The Journal of Rubber Research serves to build a collective knowledge base while communicating information and validating the quality of research within the discipline, and bringing together work from experts in rubber science and related disciplines.
Scientists in both academia and industry involved in researching and working with all aspects of rubber will find this journal to be both source of information and a gateway for their own publications.