The implantable shock absorber for medial compartment unloading of the knee: a scoping review

Alexander Golant , Allison Morgan , Yazdan Raji , Seth L. Sherman
{"title":"The implantable shock absorber for medial compartment unloading of the knee: a scoping review","authors":"Alexander Golant ,&nbsp;Allison Morgan ,&nbsp;Yazdan Raji ,&nbsp;Seth L. Sherman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2025.100252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Management of early knee osteoarthritis in young, active populations remains challenging. The medial compartment sees the majority of load through the knee during ambulation and a significant population presents with unicompartmental disease. Traditional surgical options such as high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and arthroplasty pose limitations related to invasiveness, recovery, and long-term outcomes. The implantable shock absorber (ISA) offers a novel alternative that can reduce the load in the diseased compartment while offering a rapid rehabilitation protocol and future possibility for an osteotomy or arthroplasty revision.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This review synthesizes current evidence on ISA as a treatment option for active patients with isolated medial compartment OA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search identified peer-reviewed studies, abstracts, and regulatory documents related to medial knee OA, joint unloading devices, and ISA outcomes. Findings were categorized by biomechanical rational, clinical evidence, and surgical considerations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ISA offers biomechanical effects comparable to a 5° valgus-producing HTO, reducing medial tibiofemoral contact forces by up to 53%. Studies report significant improvements in pain, functional outcomes, and survivorship, including a 97.3% three-year survival rate and a 71% reduction in Western Ontario And McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scores. ISA patients exhibit faster return to weight-bearing, lower revision rates (13.6% vs. 75.3% in HTO) and fewer serious adverse events. ISA preserves native anatomy, avoids bone resection. However, the current evidence is limited to shorter term, industry-sponsored trials.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ISA demonstrates promising, though limited clinical outcomes. Further independent studies are needed to understand the utility of ISA as a viable option for medial knee osteoarthritis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254525000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Management of early knee osteoarthritis in young, active populations remains challenging. The medial compartment sees the majority of load through the knee during ambulation and a significant population presents with unicompartmental disease. Traditional surgical options such as high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and arthroplasty pose limitations related to invasiveness, recovery, and long-term outcomes. The implantable shock absorber (ISA) offers a novel alternative that can reduce the load in the diseased compartment while offering a rapid rehabilitation protocol and future possibility for an osteotomy or arthroplasty revision.

Objectives

This review synthesizes current evidence on ISA as a treatment option for active patients with isolated medial compartment OA.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search identified peer-reviewed studies, abstracts, and regulatory documents related to medial knee OA, joint unloading devices, and ISA outcomes. Findings were categorized by biomechanical rational, clinical evidence, and surgical considerations.

Results

ISA offers biomechanical effects comparable to a 5° valgus-producing HTO, reducing medial tibiofemoral contact forces by up to 53%. Studies report significant improvements in pain, functional outcomes, and survivorship, including a 97.3% three-year survival rate and a 71% reduction in Western Ontario And McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scores. ISA patients exhibit faster return to weight-bearing, lower revision rates (13.6% vs. 75.3% in HTO) and fewer serious adverse events. ISA preserves native anatomy, avoids bone resection. However, the current evidence is limited to shorter term, industry-sponsored trials.

Conclusion

ISA demonstrates promising, though limited clinical outcomes. Further independent studies are needed to understand the utility of ISA as a viable option for medial knee osteoarthritis.
植入式减震器用于膝关节内侧腔室卸荷:范围回顾
在年轻、活跃的人群中,早期膝关节骨关节炎的管理仍然具有挑战性。行走时,内侧隔室通过膝关节承受大部分负荷,相当一部分人表现为单隔室疾病。传统的手术选择,如胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)和关节置换术,在侵入性、恢复和长期预后方面存在局限性。植入式减震器(ISA)提供了一种新颖的选择,可以减少病变腔室的负荷,同时提供快速康复方案和未来截骨或关节置换术翻修的可能性。目的:本综述综合了ISA作为孤立性内侧室骨关节炎患者的治疗选择的现有证据。方法通过全面的文献检索,确定了与膝关节内侧OA、关节卸压装置和ISA结果相关的同行评审研究、摘要和监管文件。结果根据生物力学合理性、临床证据和手术考虑进行分类。结果isa提供了与5°产生外翻的HTO相当的生物力学效果,减少内侧胫股接触力高达53%。研究报告了疼痛、功能结果和生存率的显著改善,包括97.3%的三年生存率和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数疼痛评分降低71%。ISA患者恢复体重更快,翻修率更低(13.6% vs. HTO 75.3%),严重不良事件更少。ISA保留了原有的解剖结构,避免了骨切除。然而,目前的证据仅限于短期的、行业赞助的试验。结论:isa的临床效果有限,但前景看好。需要进一步的独立研究来了解ISA作为内侧膝骨关节炎的可行选择的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书