Older yet more attractive: Multiparous ewes are preferentially courted, and elicit more mountings and ejaculations than nulliparous ewes in group breeding

IF 3.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animal Reproduction Science Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2025.108047
Gustavo Dias , Rodolfo Ungerfeld , Aline Freitas-de-Melo , Adroaldo Zanella
{"title":"Older yet more attractive: Multiparous ewes are preferentially courted, and elicit more mountings and ejaculations than nulliparous ewes in group breeding","authors":"Gustavo Dias ,&nbsp;Rodolfo Ungerfeld ,&nbsp;Aline Freitas-de-Melo ,&nbsp;Adroaldo Zanella","doi":"10.1016/j.anireprosci.2025.108047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High ewe density in group breeding enhances ram selectivity and favors the most attractive ewes. This study aimed to compare the sexual attractiveness of multiparous and nulliparous ewes. We hypothesize that multiparous ewes will be ranked as more attractive. Forty-two ewes, 21 multiparous and 21 nulliparous, Santa Ines × Dorper in estrus were tested. Each ewe was observed for five minutes, and behaviour was recorded from live and video observations. After each 5-minute test, the ewe courted for the longest time was removed and ranked as most attractive (rank 1), and this procedure continued until all six ewes in a group were ranked (1 = most to 6 = least attractive). Ewe ranking, ram behavior, and the odds of mounting acceptance were analyzed using the Friedman test, generalized mixed-effects models, and mixed-effects logistic regression, respectively. Mean attractiveness ranks were higher for multiparous than nulliparous ewes (2 ± 0.17 vs. 5 ± 0.17, P = 0.008). Rams also exhibited longer mean mounting duration (2.46 ± 0.91 s vs. 1.59 ± 0.91 s, P = 0.045) and a higher number of ejaculations (0.90 ± 0.31 vs. 0.14 ± 0.31, P = 0.0015) with multiparous ewes. While odds of accepting mounts were similar between categories (odds ratio = 0.45; 95 % CI: 0.08–2.75; P = 0.369). All first-ranked ewes were multiparous, and last two ranks were nulliparous. These results indicate multiparous estrous ewes as more attractive to rams, suggesting separating breeding groups per parity may improve fertilization rates in nulliparous ewes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7880,"journal":{"name":"Animal Reproduction Science","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 108047"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Reproduction Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378432025002866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High ewe density in group breeding enhances ram selectivity and favors the most attractive ewes. This study aimed to compare the sexual attractiveness of multiparous and nulliparous ewes. We hypothesize that multiparous ewes will be ranked as more attractive. Forty-two ewes, 21 multiparous and 21 nulliparous, Santa Ines × Dorper in estrus were tested. Each ewe was observed for five minutes, and behaviour was recorded from live and video observations. After each 5-minute test, the ewe courted for the longest time was removed and ranked as most attractive (rank 1), and this procedure continued until all six ewes in a group were ranked (1 = most to 6 = least attractive). Ewe ranking, ram behavior, and the odds of mounting acceptance were analyzed using the Friedman test, generalized mixed-effects models, and mixed-effects logistic regression, respectively. Mean attractiveness ranks were higher for multiparous than nulliparous ewes (2 ± 0.17 vs. 5 ± 0.17, P = 0.008). Rams also exhibited longer mean mounting duration (2.46 ± 0.91 s vs. 1.59 ± 0.91 s, P = 0.045) and a higher number of ejaculations (0.90 ± 0.31 vs. 0.14 ± 0.31, P = 0.0015) with multiparous ewes. While odds of accepting mounts were similar between categories (odds ratio = 0.45; 95 % CI: 0.08–2.75; P = 0.369). All first-ranked ewes were multiparous, and last two ranks were nulliparous. These results indicate multiparous estrous ewes as more attractive to rams, suggesting separating breeding groups per parity may improve fertilization rates in nulliparous ewes.
年龄更大,但更有吸引力:在群体繁殖中,产多胎的母羊比没有产过的母羊更容易交配和射精
在群体繁殖中,母羊密度高可以提高公羊的选择性,有利于最有吸引力的母羊。本研究旨在比较多产母羊和无产母羊的性吸引力。我们假设,产多胎的母羊会被认为更有吸引力。选取发情期Santa Ines × 杜珀母羊42只母羊,分别为21只多产和21只无产母羊。研究人员对每只母羊进行了五分钟的观察,并通过现场观察和视频观察记录了它们的行为。在每5分钟的测试后,求偶时间最长的母羊被移除,并被评为最具吸引力(排名1),这一过程一直持续到一组中的所有六只母羊被排名(1 =最具吸引力到6 =最不具吸引力)。母羊排名、公羊行为和被接受的几率分别使用弗里德曼检验、广义混合效应模型和混合效应逻辑回归进行分析。多产母羊的平均吸引力等级高于无产母羊(2 ± 0.17比5 ± 0.17,P = 0.008)。公羊也表现出长意味着越来越多的时间(2.46 ±0.91  年代与1.59 ±0.91  s, P = 0.045)和更多的随笔( 0.90±0.31 vs 0.14  ± 0.31,P = 0.0015)和多产的母羊。而接受坐骑的几率在不同类别之间相似(优势比= 0.45;95 % CI: 0.08-2.75; P = 0.369)。排名第一的母羊均为多胎母羊,排名最后两名的母羊均为无胎母羊。这些结果表明,多胎母羊对公羊更有吸引力,表明每胎分开繁殖组可以提高无胎母羊的受精率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Reproduction Science
Animal Reproduction Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Animal Reproduction Science publishes results from studies relating to reproduction and fertility in animals. This includes both fundamental research and applied studies, including management practices that increase our understanding of the biology and manipulation of reproduction. Manuscripts should go into depth in the mechanisms involved in the research reported, rather than a give a mere description of findings. The focus is on animals that are useful to humans including food- and fibre-producing; companion/recreational; captive; and endangered species including zoo animals, but excluding laboratory animals unless the results of the study provide new information that impacts the basic understanding of the biology or manipulation of reproduction. The journal''s scope includes the study of reproductive physiology and endocrinology, reproductive cycles, natural and artificial control of reproduction, preservation and use of gametes and embryos, pregnancy and parturition, infertility and sterility, diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. The Editorial Board of Animal Reproduction Science has decided not to publish papers in which there is an exclusive examination of the in vitro development of oocytes and embryos; however, there will be consideration of papers that include in vitro studies where the source of the oocytes and/or development of the embryos beyond the blastocyst stage is part of the experimental design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书