Lui Holder-Pearson , J. Geoffrey Chase , Yeong Shiong Chiew , Geoffrey Shaw , Bernard Lambermont , Thomas Desaive
{"title":"Experimental Validation of the ACTIV Multi-Patient Mechanical Ventilation System","authors":"Lui Holder-Pearson , J. Geoffrey Chase , Yeong Shiong Chiew , Geoffrey Shaw , Bernard Lambermont , Thomas Desaive","doi":"10.1016/j.ifacsc.2025.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute respiratory distress and respiratory disease often require patients be treated with mechanical ventilation (MV) and thus place extreme demand on intensive care units (ICUs). This burden can be unsustainably high in some periods, and particularly during pandemics, such as Covid-19. In low resource regions and countries, the result can be inequity, a problem addressable via simple technological innovation. Ventilator sharing over two or more patients has been proposed but strongly discouraged because it could not treat different patient needs and hindered individual patient monitoring. However, all these approaches ventilated patients in-parallel, each breathing at the same time.</div><div>A simple switching valve enables series breathing, one patient after the other. External, low-cost, and reusable sensor arrays enable individual monitoring, while low-cost adjustable pressure reducing valves allow pressure to be fully customised across two patients. This study uses an experimental test lung to experimentally demonstrate and validate the ability of such a system to balance ventilation across 2 simulated patients with very different lung compliances.</div><div>A method is presented to achieve equal tidal volumes in two lungs with differing compliances of 0.10 L cmH <sub>2</sub>O<sup>−1</sup> and 0.05 L cmH <sub>2</sub>O<sup>−1</sup>. This goal requires driving and end-expiratory pressures of at least 20 cmH <sub>2</sub>O, which are clinically relatively high. The approach prioritises safety, ensuring more compliant lung is not over-ventilated during the process, reducing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The system is compatible with different ventilators, and cost-effectively fabricated in low-resource settings. Strategies addressing key safety concerns, such as cross-contamination, sterilisation, and ventilator configuration, are also presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29926,"journal":{"name":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468601825000574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress and respiratory disease often require patients be treated with mechanical ventilation (MV) and thus place extreme demand on intensive care units (ICUs). This burden can be unsustainably high in some periods, and particularly during pandemics, such as Covid-19. In low resource regions and countries, the result can be inequity, a problem addressable via simple technological innovation. Ventilator sharing over two or more patients has been proposed but strongly discouraged because it could not treat different patient needs and hindered individual patient monitoring. However, all these approaches ventilated patients in-parallel, each breathing at the same time.
A simple switching valve enables series breathing, one patient after the other. External, low-cost, and reusable sensor arrays enable individual monitoring, while low-cost adjustable pressure reducing valves allow pressure to be fully customised across two patients. This study uses an experimental test lung to experimentally demonstrate and validate the ability of such a system to balance ventilation across 2 simulated patients with very different lung compliances.
A method is presented to achieve equal tidal volumes in two lungs with differing compliances of 0.10 L cmH 2O−1 and 0.05 L cmH 2O−1. This goal requires driving and end-expiratory pressures of at least 20 cmH 2O, which are clinically relatively high. The approach prioritises safety, ensuring more compliant lung is not over-ventilated during the process, reducing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The system is compatible with different ventilators, and cost-effectively fabricated in low-resource settings. Strategies addressing key safety concerns, such as cross-contamination, sterilisation, and ventilator configuration, are also presented.
急性呼吸窘迫和呼吸系统疾病通常需要患者进行机械通气(MV)治疗,因此对重症监护病房(icu)提出了极高的要求。在某些时期,特别是在Covid-19等大流行期间,这种负担可能高得不可持续。在资源匮乏的地区和国家,结果可能是不平等,这个问题可以通过简单的技术创新来解决。两名或两名以上患者共用呼吸机已被提议,但强烈反对,因为它不能满足不同患者的需求,并阻碍了患者的个体监测。然而,所有这些方法都是平行的,每次呼吸都是同时进行的。一个简单的开关阀可以实现病人一个接一个的连续呼吸。外部、低成本和可重复使用的传感器阵列可以实现个人监测,而低成本的可调减压阀可以完全定制两个患者的压力。本研究通过实验测试肺,实验证明并验证了该系统在两个肺顺应性差异很大的模拟患者中平衡通气的能力。提出了一种方法,以实现相等的潮汐体积在两个肺不同的顺应性0.10 L cmh2o−1和0.05 L cmh2o−1。这一目标要求驱动和呼气末压力至少为20 cmh2o,这在临床上是相对较高的。该方法优先考虑安全性,确保更适应的肺在通气过程中不会过度通气,降低呼吸机诱导肺损伤(VILI)的风险。该系统与不同的呼吸机兼容,并且在低资源环境下具有成本效益。还提出了解决关键安全问题的策略,例如交叉污染,灭菌和呼吸机配置。