Responses of African food systems to climate change: A systematic review of concepts, methods, and evidence

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104577
Mark Appiah-Twumasi , Cornelis Gardebroek , Rico Ihle , Isaac G.K. Ansah
{"title":"Responses of African food systems to climate change: A systematic review of concepts, methods, and evidence","authors":"Mark Appiah-Twumasi ,&nbsp;Cornelis Gardebroek ,&nbsp;Rico Ihle ,&nbsp;Isaac G.K. Ansah","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>African food systems are highly vulnerable to external shocks, especially climate change, yet remain central to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Research on the intersection of food systems and climate change in Africa is fragmented and lacks coherence in conceptual frameworks and measurement approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study systematically reviews the peer-reviewed literature in life sciences, biomedicine and economics to assess how African food systems are conceptualized in the context of climate change, evaluate the methods used to study climate impacts, and synthesize empirical findings related to food security, nutrition, social welfare, and environmental sustainability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically review 56 peer-reviewed studies published between 2007 and 2024. Studies were selected using PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using thematic synthesis grounded in food systems and systems theory. We categorize conceptual approaches and assess methodological and empirical patterns across the selected literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>Two conceptual models dominate. Complete models integrate environmental, social, and institutional linkages to capture systemic feedbacks and governance structures, while partial models focus on localized adaptation processes and actor interactions. The choice of the approach depends on the research objectives, data availability, and analytical scale. Most studies use qualitative or cross-sectional methods, limiting quantification of resilience or actor-level trade-offs—such as tensions between producers and consumers or between food security and environmental sustainability. Armed conflict or informal resource extraction are rarely integrated into climate–food system models despite their growing importance. Future research is recommended to employ hybrid, data-driven frameworks that link actor-specific dynamics with system-level feedbacks, operationalize resilience metrics, and assess the coherence of climate and food policies across all geographical and analytical scales.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The African Union's “Decade of Action” (2021−2030) calls for science-policy efforts to address persistent development challenges through a food-systems lens. This review contributes to scientific progress and policy formulation by providing an actionable conceptual framework, synthesizing existing evidence, identifying research gaps, and proposing a future research agenda focused on resilience measurement, policy alignment, and integrated modeling of climate, conflict, and food-system interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104577"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25003178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

African food systems are highly vulnerable to external shocks, especially climate change, yet remain central to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Research on the intersection of food systems and climate change in Africa is fragmented and lacks coherence in conceptual frameworks and measurement approaches.

Objective

This study systematically reviews the peer-reviewed literature in life sciences, biomedicine and economics to assess how African food systems are conceptualized in the context of climate change, evaluate the methods used to study climate impacts, and synthesize empirical findings related to food security, nutrition, social welfare, and environmental sustainability.

Methods

We systematically review 56 peer-reviewed studies published between 2007 and 2024. Studies were selected using PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using thematic synthesis grounded in food systems and systems theory. We categorize conceptual approaches and assess methodological and empirical patterns across the selected literature.

Results and conclusions

Two conceptual models dominate. Complete models integrate environmental, social, and institutional linkages to capture systemic feedbacks and governance structures, while partial models focus on localized adaptation processes and actor interactions. The choice of the approach depends on the research objectives, data availability, and analytical scale. Most studies use qualitative or cross-sectional methods, limiting quantification of resilience or actor-level trade-offs—such as tensions between producers and consumers or between food security and environmental sustainability. Armed conflict or informal resource extraction are rarely integrated into climate–food system models despite their growing importance. Future research is recommended to employ hybrid, data-driven frameworks that link actor-specific dynamics with system-level feedbacks, operationalize resilience metrics, and assess the coherence of climate and food policies across all geographical and analytical scales.

Significance

The African Union's “Decade of Action” (2021−2030) calls for science-policy efforts to address persistent development challenges through a food-systems lens. This review contributes to scientific progress and policy formulation by providing an actionable conceptual framework, synthesizing existing evidence, identifying research gaps, and proposing a future research agenda focused on resilience measurement, policy alignment, and integrated modeling of climate, conflict, and food-system interactions.

Abstract Image

非洲粮食系统对气候变化的反应:对概念、方法和证据的系统回顾
非洲粮食系统极易受到外部冲击,特别是气候变化的影响,但仍然是实现可持续发展目标的核心。关于非洲粮食系统与气候变化相互关系的研究是零散的,在概念框架和测量方法上缺乏一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书