Microbial load and composition of intrauterine device string correlates with symptomatic removals in parous women.

IF 2.5 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Laura K Hamann, Rachel L Washburn, Michael Makii, Elisa Brown, Moss Hampton, Natalia Schlabritz-Lutsevich, Gary Ventolini, Kendra P Rumbaugh, Craig Tipton, Whitni K Redman
{"title":"Microbial load and composition of intrauterine device string correlates with symptomatic removals in parous women.","authors":"Laura K Hamann, Rachel L Washburn, Michael Makii, Elisa Brown, Moss Hampton, Natalia Schlabritz-Lutsevich, Gary Ventolini, Kendra P Rumbaugh, Craig Tipton, Whitni K Redman","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00413-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: A contraceptive intrauterine device (IUD) is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved method of contraception that is effective and generally well tolerated by patients. However, reports show that IUDs might be associated with inflammation, leading to symptoms like abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Pelvic inflammation potentially could be linked to IUD pathogenic biofilm colonization. However, the role of non-pathological microbial communities in this context is not well understood. The aim of the present observational study was to describe the microbiome of the IUD string located in the vagina and cervix in patients with and without IUD related complications. METHODS: Patients being seen for the removal of their IUD were identified for this study and were grouped according to removal for ‘asymptomatic’ or ‘symptomatic’ reasons. Asymptomatic removals included IUD expiration and desire to conceive while symptomatic removals stemmed from patient complaints, including abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, and vaginitis. The IUD strings were sent for microbiome profiling by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene sequencing to characterize bacterial composition and universal 16S quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to estimate bacterial bioburden. Microbial composition was compared to determine if symptomatic IUD removal was associated with altered bacterial load, diversity, or composition, with an emphasis on Lactobacillus and non-Lactobacillus abundance. RESULTS: Asymptomatic removals (group A, n = 8) had higher parity (p = 0.012) while relative abundance of Lactobacilli did not differ between groups (p = 0.57). Group A demonstrated a higher abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri compared to symptomatic removals (group S, n = 5), which showed increased overall bacterial load (p = 0.011) and a greater relative abundance of non-Lactobacillus species (p = 0.054), including potentially pathogenic genera such as Fusobacterium and Haemophilus. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed differences in bacterial populations associated with symptomatic IUD removal with a higher overall bacterial burden and abundance of non-Lactobacillus genera. Though the current study is not powered to make conclusions on whether different types of IUDs have differential microbiota or how IUD type relates to complications, these results suggest that the microbiome may contribute. Future research should investigate bacterial composition through the duration of IUD use as well as the variation of the bacterial composition on the different components of the IUD device and explore the potential of targeted intervention with probiotics or antibiotics to prevent or reduce complications associated with IUD contraception. </p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12781424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00413-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A contraceptive intrauterine device (IUD) is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved method of contraception that is effective and generally well tolerated by patients. However, reports show that IUDs might be associated with inflammation, leading to symptoms like abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Pelvic inflammation potentially could be linked to IUD pathogenic biofilm colonization. However, the role of non-pathological microbial communities in this context is not well understood. The aim of the present observational study was to describe the microbiome of the IUD string located in the vagina and cervix in patients with and without IUD related complications. METHODS: Patients being seen for the removal of their IUD were identified for this study and were grouped according to removal for ‘asymptomatic’ or ‘symptomatic’ reasons. Asymptomatic removals included IUD expiration and desire to conceive while symptomatic removals stemmed from patient complaints, including abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, and vaginitis. The IUD strings were sent for microbiome profiling by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene sequencing to characterize bacterial composition and universal 16S quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to estimate bacterial bioburden. Microbial composition was compared to determine if symptomatic IUD removal was associated with altered bacterial load, diversity, or composition, with an emphasis on Lactobacillus and non-Lactobacillus abundance. RESULTS: Asymptomatic removals (group A, n = 8) had higher parity (p = 0.012) while relative abundance of Lactobacilli did not differ between groups (p = 0.57). Group A demonstrated a higher abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri compared to symptomatic removals (group S, n = 5), which showed increased overall bacterial load (p = 0.011) and a greater relative abundance of non-Lactobacillus species (p = 0.054), including potentially pathogenic genera such as Fusobacterium and Haemophilus. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed differences in bacterial populations associated with symptomatic IUD removal with a higher overall bacterial burden and abundance of non-Lactobacillus genera. Though the current study is not powered to make conclusions on whether different types of IUDs have differential microbiota or how IUD type relates to complications, these results suggest that the microbiome may contribute. Future research should investigate bacterial composition through the duration of IUD use as well as the variation of the bacterial composition on the different components of the IUD device and explore the potential of targeted intervention with probiotics or antibiotics to prevent or reduce complications associated with IUD contraception.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

微生物负荷和宫内节育器串的组成与分娩妇女的症状清除相关。
背景:避孕宫内节育器(IUD)是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的一种有效且患者普遍耐受良好的避孕方法。然而,报告显示宫内节育器可能与炎症有关,导致异常出血和盆腔疼痛等症状。盆腔炎可能与宫内节育器致病性生物膜定植有关。然而,在这种情况下,非病理性微生物群落的作用尚未得到很好的理解。本观察性研究的目的是描述有或没有宫内节育器相关并发症的患者阴道和子宫颈内的宫内节育器串的微生物组。方法:在本研究中确定了取出宫内节育器的患者,并根据“无症状”或“有症状”的原因进行分组。无症状摘除包括宫内节育器过期和渴望怀孕,而有症状摘除则源于患者主诉,包括异常出血、盆腔疼痛和阴道炎。通过16S核糖体核糖核酸(rRNA)基因测序分析细菌组成,并采用通用16S定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)估计细菌生物负荷。比较微生物组成,以确定是否有症状的宫内节育器去除与细菌负荷、多样性或组成的改变有关,重点是乳酸菌和非乳酸菌的丰度。结果:无症状切除(A组,n = 8)有较高的胎次(p = 0.012),而乳酸菌的相对丰度在组间无差异(p = 0.57)。与症状清除组相比(S组,n = 5), A组显示出更高的罗伊氏乳杆菌丰度,S组显示出总体细菌负荷增加(p = 0.011),非乳杆菌种类的相对丰度更高(p = 0.054),包括潜在致病性属,如梭杆菌和嗜血杆菌。结论:该研究揭示了与症状性宫内节育器取出相关的细菌种群差异,总体细菌负担较高,非乳杆菌属丰度较高。虽然目前的研究还不能得出结论,不同类型的宫内节育器是否有不同的微生物群,或者宫内节育器类型与并发症的关系,但这些结果表明微生物群可能有所贡献。未来的研究应通过使用宫内节育器的时间来调查细菌组成,以及宫内节育器不同部件上细菌组成的变化,并探索益生菌或抗生素靶向干预的潜力,以预防或减少宫内节育器避孕相关并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书