Fosfomycin-based combinations against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: Correlating in vitro synergy with clinical outcomes
Melike Törüyenler Coşkunpınar , Güle Çınar , Duygu Öcal , İsmail Balık
{"title":"Fosfomycin-based combinations against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: Correlating in vitro synergy with clinical outcomes","authors":"Melike Törüyenler Coşkunpınar , Güle Çınar , Duygu Öcal , İsmail Balık","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carbapenemase-producing <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (CP-Kp) poses a significant global health threat due to its limited treatment options and increasing resistance. Fosfomycin (FOF) has regained interest, particularly in combination therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro synergy of FOF with meropenem (MEM) and polymyxin in CP-Kp bloodstream infections (BSI) and to investigate clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty-two patients with CP-Kp BSI who received FOF-based combination therapy (FOF-C) for ≥72 h were evaluated retrospectively for clinical outcomes. Minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) were determined on stored isolates: FOF by agar dilution (AD) and broth microdilution, MEM and COL by broth microdilution. In vitro synergy testing of FOF with MEM and COL was performed using the checkerboard method. Data were analysed using logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 50 isolates, the FOF AD MIC<sub>50/90</sub> were 64/>128 µg/mL. Positive in vitro interactions (synergistic or additive) were observed in 43.5% of isolates for both FOF + MEM and FOF + COL, with no antagonism. The clinical and microbiological response rates were 61.5% and 80.5%, 14- and 30-d mortality rates were 21.2% and 40.4%, respectively. Patients receiving at least one agent with in vitro positive interaction had higher clinical response, but the difference wasn’t significant (73.7% vs. 52.2% <em>P</em> = 0.153). In multivariable analysis, increased FOF AD MIC and Pitt bacteraemia score were associated with clinical nonresponse, while higher COL MIC and Pitt bacteraemia score predicted 30-d mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FOF AD MIC value may have potential as a predictive marker for FOF-C treatment response in CP-Kp BSI and could aid in guiding combination therapy decisions. Larger, prospective studies using standardized synergy testing methods are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"67 2","pages":"Article 107687"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857925002420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp) poses a significant global health threat due to its limited treatment options and increasing resistance. Fosfomycin (FOF) has regained interest, particularly in combination therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro synergy of FOF with meropenem (MEM) and polymyxin in CP-Kp bloodstream infections (BSI) and to investigate clinical outcomes.
Methods
Fifty-two patients with CP-Kp BSI who received FOF-based combination therapy (FOF-C) for ≥72 h were evaluated retrospectively for clinical outcomes. Minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) were determined on stored isolates: FOF by agar dilution (AD) and broth microdilution, MEM and COL by broth microdilution. In vitro synergy testing of FOF with MEM and COL was performed using the checkerboard method. Data were analysed using logistic regression.
Results
Among 50 isolates, the FOF AD MIC50/90 were 64/>128 µg/mL. Positive in vitro interactions (synergistic or additive) were observed in 43.5% of isolates for both FOF + MEM and FOF + COL, with no antagonism. The clinical and microbiological response rates were 61.5% and 80.5%, 14- and 30-d mortality rates were 21.2% and 40.4%, respectively. Patients receiving at least one agent with in vitro positive interaction had higher clinical response, but the difference wasn’t significant (73.7% vs. 52.2% P = 0.153). In multivariable analysis, increased FOF AD MIC and Pitt bacteraemia score were associated with clinical nonresponse, while higher COL MIC and Pitt bacteraemia score predicted 30-d mortality.
Conclusions
FOF AD MIC value may have potential as a predictive marker for FOF-C treatment response in CP-Kp BSI and could aid in guiding combination therapy decisions. Larger, prospective studies using standardized synergy testing methods are needed.
背景:产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌(CP-Kp)由于其治疗选择有限和耐药性增加,对全球健康构成重大威胁。磷霉素(FOF)已重新引起人们的兴趣,特别是在联合治疗中。本研究旨在评估FOF与美罗培南(MEM)和多粘菌素在CP-Kp血流感染(BSI)中的体外协同作用,并探讨临床结果。方法:回顾性评价52例接受fof联合治疗(FOF-C)≥72小时的CP-Kp BSI患者的临床结果。对储存的分离株进行mic测定:琼脂稀释法(AD)和肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)测定FOF, BMD测定MEM和COL。采用棋盘法测定FOF与MEM、COL的体外协同作用。数据采用逻辑回归分析。结果:50株分离菌FOF AD MIC50/90为64/ bb0 ~ 128 μg/mL;43.5%的分离株对FOF+MEM和FOF+COL均有正向的体外相互作用(协同或加性),无拮抗作用。临床和微生物应答率分别为61.5%和80.5%,14天和30天死亡率分别为21.2%和40.4%。接受至少一种药物体外正相互作用的患者临床疗效较高,但差异无统计学意义(73.7% vs. 52.2% p=0.153)。在多变量分析中,FOF AD MIC和Pitt菌血症评分(PBS)升高与临床无反应相关,而较高的COL MIC和PBS预测30天死亡率。结论:FOF- AD - MIC值可能作为预测CP-Kp BSI患者FOF- c治疗反应的潜在指标,并有助于指导联合治疗决策。需要使用标准化协同测试方法进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.