Sandeep Deshmukh, Hari Shankar Meshram, Subho Banerjee, Vivek B Kute, Sanshriti Chauhan, Ruchir Dave, Himanshu Patel
{"title":"A Prospective Single-center Study Assessing the Immunogenicity of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.","authors":"Sandeep Deshmukh, Hari Shankar Meshram, Subho Banerjee, Vivek B Kute, Sanshriti Chauhan, Ruchir Dave, Himanshu Patel","doi":"10.4103/sjkdt.sjkdt_606_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a definite paucity of data about the safety and immunogenicity of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine among patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). We aimed to assess the humoral response following this vaccine in a single center of India. In this prospective study, a total of 31 MHD cases were recruited and analyzed. The response was compared with a control group composed of 23 health-care workers. All participants had received two doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca (COVISHIELD) vaccine. The serology testing was done with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein antibody assay using indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay after 1 month of the second dose. A cutoff of 15 arbitrary unit (AU)/mL was considered a positive seropositive response. The median age of the patients was 44 (36-52.5) years. Five cases were pretransplant and three were posttransplant with graft failures. Fourteen (45.1%) cases had a 4-week gap between the two doses whereas 17 (54.9%) had an 8-week gap. The median (interquartile range) antibody levels of the MHD and control groups were 400 (315-400) and 398 (367-400) AU/mL, respectively (P = 0.37). All MHD and control groups developed a positive seroresponse. There was no difference in antibody response concerning age, sex, dialysis vintage, or dosing schedule. However, there was a significant difference in the level of antibody response for the MHD cases on immunosuppressive drugs (P = 0.02). The humoral response in maintenance dialysis patients with Oxford-AstraZeneca was comparable to general patients in our report, and immunosuppressive medications were associated with a decreased seroresponse.</p>","PeriodicalId":21356,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation","volume":"35 1-6","pages":"142-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjkdt.sjkdt_606_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a definite paucity of data about the safety and immunogenicity of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine among patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). We aimed to assess the humoral response following this vaccine in a single center of India. In this prospective study, a total of 31 MHD cases were recruited and analyzed. The response was compared with a control group composed of 23 health-care workers. All participants had received two doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca (COVISHIELD) vaccine. The serology testing was done with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein antibody assay using indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay after 1 month of the second dose. A cutoff of 15 arbitrary unit (AU)/mL was considered a positive seropositive response. The median age of the patients was 44 (36-52.5) years. Five cases were pretransplant and three were posttransplant with graft failures. Fourteen (45.1%) cases had a 4-week gap between the two doses whereas 17 (54.9%) had an 8-week gap. The median (interquartile range) antibody levels of the MHD and control groups were 400 (315-400) and 398 (367-400) AU/mL, respectively (P = 0.37). All MHD and control groups developed a positive seroresponse. There was no difference in antibody response concerning age, sex, dialysis vintage, or dosing schedule. However, there was a significant difference in the level of antibody response for the MHD cases on immunosuppressive drugs (P = 0.02). The humoral response in maintenance dialysis patients with Oxford-AstraZeneca was comparable to general patients in our report, and immunosuppressive medications were associated with a decreased seroresponse.
期刊介绍:
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation (SJKDT, ISSN 1319-2442) is the official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It is published six times a year. SJKDT publishes peer-reviewed original research work and review papers related to kidney diseases, urinary tract, renal replacement therapies, and transplantation. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on cell therapy and islet transplantation, clinical transplantation, experimental transplantation, immunobiology and genomics and xenotransplantation related to the kidney. The journal also publishes short communications, case studies, letters to the editors, an annotated bibliography and a column on news and views.