Gender-segregated trajectories to a university major and career-related motivation

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-07 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102847
Jeffrey M. DeVries, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Richard Arum
{"title":"Gender-segregated trajectories to a university major and career-related motivation","authors":"Jeffrey M. DeVries,&nbsp;Jacquelynne S. Eccles,&nbsp;Richard Arum","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Women enroll in many university majors at a lower rate than men, which relates to inequities in many future career fields. To understand such disparities, we identified heterogeneous trajectories through which students change their majors in terms of the majors' gender ratios. Through the lens of situated expectancy-value theory, we examined changes in task value related to each trajectory. Trajectories were identified across all students from 2017 to 2020 (<em>N</em> = 23,328), a subset of whom (<em>n</em> = 2380) participated in surveys regarding their self-rated career aptitude and desired career attributes. We identified five trajectories of major enrollment in terms of gender ratio: <em>stable-female</em>, <em>stable-male</em>, <em>stable-neutral</em>, <em>male-to-female</em>, and <em>female-to-neutral</em>. Gender disparities were common across both STEM and non-STEM majors. Students on the <em>male-to-female</em> trajectory were much more likely to have a drop in their self-rated science aptitude and an increase in their desire for prosocial opportunities in their subsequent careers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 102847"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025002237","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women enroll in many university majors at a lower rate than men, which relates to inequities in many future career fields. To understand such disparities, we identified heterogeneous trajectories through which students change their majors in terms of the majors' gender ratios. Through the lens of situated expectancy-value theory, we examined changes in task value related to each trajectory. Trajectories were identified across all students from 2017 to 2020 (N = 23,328), a subset of whom (n = 2380) participated in surveys regarding their self-rated career aptitude and desired career attributes. We identified five trajectories of major enrollment in terms of gender ratio: stable-female, stable-male, stable-neutral, male-to-female, and female-to-neutral. Gender disparities were common across both STEM and non-STEM majors. Students on the male-to-female trajectory were much more likely to have a drop in their self-rated science aptitude and an increase in their desire for prosocial opportunities in their subsequent careers.
性别隔离的大学专业轨迹和职业相关动机
女性在许多大学专业的入学率低于男性,这与许多未来职业领域的不平等有关。为了理解这种差异,我们确定了学生在专业性别比例方面改变专业的异质轨迹。通过定位期望值理论的镜头,我们检查了与每个轨迹相关的任务值的变化。从2017年到2020年,我们确定了所有学生(N = 23328)的轨迹,其中一部分学生(N = 2380)参加了关于他们自我评估的职业能力和期望的职业属性的调查。我们在性别比例方面确定了五种专业入学轨迹:稳定的女性,稳定的男性,稳定的中性,男性对女性和女性对中性。性别差异在STEM和非STEM专业中都很普遍。男女同组的学生更有可能在科学能力的自我评价上有所下降,而在随后的职业生涯中,他们对亲社会机会的渴望却有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书