Jeffrey M. DeVries, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Richard Arum
{"title":"Gender-segregated trajectories to a university major and career-related motivation","authors":"Jeffrey M. DeVries, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Richard Arum","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Women enroll in many university majors at a lower rate than men, which relates to inequities in many future career fields. To understand such disparities, we identified heterogeneous trajectories through which students change their majors in terms of the majors' gender ratios. Through the lens of situated expectancy-value theory, we examined changes in task value related to each trajectory. Trajectories were identified across all students from 2017 to 2020 (<em>N</em> = 23,328), a subset of whom (<em>n</em> = 2380) participated in surveys regarding their self-rated career aptitude and desired career attributes. We identified five trajectories of major enrollment in terms of gender ratio: <em>stable-female</em>, <em>stable-male</em>, <em>stable-neutral</em>, <em>male-to-female</em>, and <em>female-to-neutral</em>. Gender disparities were common across both STEM and non-STEM majors. Students on the <em>male-to-female</em> trajectory were much more likely to have a drop in their self-rated science aptitude and an increase in their desire for prosocial opportunities in their subsequent careers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 102847"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025002237","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Women enroll in many university majors at a lower rate than men, which relates to inequities in many future career fields. To understand such disparities, we identified heterogeneous trajectories through which students change their majors in terms of the majors' gender ratios. Through the lens of situated expectancy-value theory, we examined changes in task value related to each trajectory. Trajectories were identified across all students from 2017 to 2020 (N = 23,328), a subset of whom (n = 2380) participated in surveys regarding their self-rated career aptitude and desired career attributes. We identified five trajectories of major enrollment in terms of gender ratio: stable-female, stable-male, stable-neutral, male-to-female, and female-to-neutral. Gender disparities were common across both STEM and non-STEM majors. Students on the male-to-female trajectory were much more likely to have a drop in their self-rated science aptitude and an increase in their desire for prosocial opportunities in their subsequent careers.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).