{"title":"Air side thermal and hydraulic performance assessment of skived, louver, offset honeycomb, and metal foam finned mini-channel heat exchangers","authors":"Bahadır Doğan , M. Mete Ozturk , Levent Turhan","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative performance evaluation of mini-channel compact heat exchangers, focusing on four distinct extended surface configurations of skived plate fin, louver fin, metal foam, and offset honeycomb. The experiments are conducted in an air tunnel, where the <em>Re</em> number of the airflow ranges from 100–1400, and a constant surface temperature is maintained using a water bath. To ensure a fair comparison, all four configurations are tested under identical conditions. The performance of each configuration is assessed in terms of air-side heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, Colburn <em>j</em>-factor, and friction factor. In addition to these conventional performance indicators, the heat exchangers are further evaluated using the heat transfer index with respect to friction power, both with and without accounting for compactness. According to the findings, although the cell-based configurations consistently outperform the plate-fin configurations under all conditions, the metal foam and offset honeycomb each demonstrate superiority in different performance metrics. While the heat transfer coefficient reaches approximately 110 W/(m<sup>2</sup>K) for the metal foam configuration, the offset honeycomb achieves up to 100 W/(m<sup>2</sup>K) within the same flow range. When evaluated based on the heat transfer index considering compactness, the performance order shifts, with offset honeycomb and metal foam providing values of 60.08 kW/(m<sup>3</sup>K) and 56.76 kW/(m<sup>3</sup>K), respectively. Under all tested conditions, the louver configuration, although the most commonly utilized extended surface in conventional applications, falls short of achieving the performance levels demonstrated by the novel designs introduced in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 102242"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a comparative performance evaluation of mini-channel compact heat exchangers, focusing on four distinct extended surface configurations of skived plate fin, louver fin, metal foam, and offset honeycomb. The experiments are conducted in an air tunnel, where the Re number of the airflow ranges from 100–1400, and a constant surface temperature is maintained using a water bath. To ensure a fair comparison, all four configurations are tested under identical conditions. The performance of each configuration is assessed in terms of air-side heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, Colburn j-factor, and friction factor. In addition to these conventional performance indicators, the heat exchangers are further evaluated using the heat transfer index with respect to friction power, both with and without accounting for compactness. According to the findings, although the cell-based configurations consistently outperform the plate-fin configurations under all conditions, the metal foam and offset honeycomb each demonstrate superiority in different performance metrics. While the heat transfer coefficient reaches approximately 110 W/(m2K) for the metal foam configuration, the offset honeycomb achieves up to 100 W/(m2K) within the same flow range. When evaluated based on the heat transfer index considering compactness, the performance order shifts, with offset honeycomb and metal foam providing values of 60.08 kW/(m3K) and 56.76 kW/(m3K), respectively. Under all tested conditions, the louver configuration, although the most commonly utilized extended surface in conventional applications, falls short of achieving the performance levels demonstrated by the novel designs introduced in this study.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology.
The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including:
-Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing)
-Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences)
-Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)