Air side thermal and hydraulic performance assessment of skived, louver, offset honeycomb, and metal foam finned mini-channel heat exchangers

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bahadır Doğan , M. Mete Ozturk , Levent Turhan
{"title":"Air side thermal and hydraulic performance assessment of skived, louver, offset honeycomb, and metal foam finned mini-channel heat exchangers","authors":"Bahadır Doğan ,&nbsp;M. Mete Ozturk ,&nbsp;Levent Turhan","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative performance evaluation of mini-channel compact heat exchangers, focusing on four distinct extended surface configurations of skived plate fin, louver fin, metal foam, and offset honeycomb. The experiments are conducted in an air tunnel, where the <em>Re</em> number of the airflow ranges from 100–1400, and a constant surface temperature is maintained using a water bath. To ensure a fair comparison, all four configurations are tested under identical conditions. The performance of each configuration is assessed in terms of air-side heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, Colburn <em>j</em>-factor, and friction factor. In addition to these conventional performance indicators, the heat exchangers are further evaluated using the heat transfer index with respect to friction power, both with and without accounting for compactness. According to the findings, although the cell-based configurations consistently outperform the plate-fin configurations under all conditions, the metal foam and offset honeycomb each demonstrate superiority in different performance metrics. While the heat transfer coefficient reaches approximately 110 W/(m<sup>2</sup>K) for the metal foam configuration, the offset honeycomb achieves up to 100 W/(m<sup>2</sup>K) within the same flow range. When evaluated based on the heat transfer index considering compactness, the performance order shifts, with offset honeycomb and metal foam providing values of 60.08 kW/(m<sup>3</sup>K) and 56.76 kW/(m<sup>3</sup>K), respectively. Under all tested conditions, the louver configuration, although the most commonly utilized extended surface in conventional applications, falls short of achieving the performance levels demonstrated by the novel designs introduced in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 102242"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative performance evaluation of mini-channel compact heat exchangers, focusing on four distinct extended surface configurations of skived plate fin, louver fin, metal foam, and offset honeycomb. The experiments are conducted in an air tunnel, where the Re number of the airflow ranges from 100–1400, and a constant surface temperature is maintained using a water bath. To ensure a fair comparison, all four configurations are tested under identical conditions. The performance of each configuration is assessed in terms of air-side heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, Colburn j-factor, and friction factor. In addition to these conventional performance indicators, the heat exchangers are further evaluated using the heat transfer index with respect to friction power, both with and without accounting for compactness. According to the findings, although the cell-based configurations consistently outperform the plate-fin configurations under all conditions, the metal foam and offset honeycomb each demonstrate superiority in different performance metrics. While the heat transfer coefficient reaches approximately 110 W/(m2K) for the metal foam configuration, the offset honeycomb achieves up to 100 W/(m2K) within the same flow range. When evaluated based on the heat transfer index considering compactness, the performance order shifts, with offset honeycomb and metal foam providing values of 60.08 kW/(m3K) and 56.76 kW/(m3K), respectively. Under all tested conditions, the louver configuration, although the most commonly utilized extended surface in conventional applications, falls short of achieving the performance levels demonstrated by the novel designs introduced in this study.
楔形,百叶,偏移蜂窝和金属泡沫翅片微型通道热交换器的空气侧热和水力性能评估
本研究对小型通道紧凑型热交换器的性能进行了比较评估,重点研究了四种不同的扩展表面结构:刨花板翅片、百叶翅片、金属泡沫和偏移蜂窝。实验在风洞中进行,气流的雷诺数在100-1400之间,用水浴保持表面温度恒定。为了确保公平的比较,在相同的条件下测试了所有四种配置。根据空气侧传热系数、压降、科尔伯恩j系数和摩擦系数来评估每种配置的性能。除了这些常规的性能指标外,热交换器还使用与摩擦功率有关的传热指标进行进一步评估,包括考虑和不考虑紧凑性。根据研究结果,尽管基于单元的配置在所有条件下都优于板鳍配置,但金属泡沫和偏移蜂窝在不同的性能指标上都表现出优势。金属泡沫结构的传热系数约为110 W/(m2K),而偏移蜂窝在相同流量范围内的传热系数可达100 W/(m2K)。当考虑紧凑性的传热指数时,性能顺序发生变化,偏移蜂窝和金属泡沫的值分别为60.08 kW/(m3K)和56.76 kW/(m3K)。在所有测试条件下,百叶窗配置,虽然在传统应用中最常用的扩展表面,未能达到本研究中介绍的新设计所展示的性能水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech
Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech Materials Science-Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology. The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including: -Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing) -Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences) -Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书