The geography of the party on the ground: Local branches in Italy and Sweden in the late twentieth century

IF 4.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Political Geography Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103467
Duncan McDonnell, Sofia Ammassari
{"title":"The geography of the party on the ground: Local branches in Italy and Sweden in the late twentieth century","authors":"Duncan McDonnell,&nbsp;Sofia Ammassari","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The idea that the presence of Western European political parties at grassroots level rose and fell in the twentieth century is central to some of the most influential theories of party organization. However, due to a mixture of patchy national-level data that has been provided by the parties themselves, and a focus by scholars on members rather than branches, we know little about the geography of party structures on the ground. In this article, we address these issues by using an unobtrusive method – consulting historical phonebooks – to determine exactly where parties invested in local branches in Italy and Sweden in the second half of the twentieth century. We theorize that the extent to which parties were present uniformly across a national territory depended on the degree to which politics was nationalized in that country. Using spatial lag regressions, we find strong support for our argument: in the less nationalized case of Italy, parties’ investments in local branches followed two major geographically-based cleavages – center vs periphery, and urban vs rural – while in the more nationalized Sweden, they were relatively uniform across different types of geographical areas. Overall, our findings illustrate how the extent to which you saw the rise and fall of the party on the ground in the second half of the twentieth century depended on where you were. Our research thus shines new light on the history of the party on the ground, in addition to underscoring the value of “bringing territory in” to the study of party organization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 103467"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825002008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The idea that the presence of Western European political parties at grassroots level rose and fell in the twentieth century is central to some of the most influential theories of party organization. However, due to a mixture of patchy national-level data that has been provided by the parties themselves, and a focus by scholars on members rather than branches, we know little about the geography of party structures on the ground. In this article, we address these issues by using an unobtrusive method – consulting historical phonebooks – to determine exactly where parties invested in local branches in Italy and Sweden in the second half of the twentieth century. We theorize that the extent to which parties were present uniformly across a national territory depended on the degree to which politics was nationalized in that country. Using spatial lag regressions, we find strong support for our argument: in the less nationalized case of Italy, parties’ investments in local branches followed two major geographically-based cleavages – center vs periphery, and urban vs rural – while in the more nationalized Sweden, they were relatively uniform across different types of geographical areas. Overall, our findings illustrate how the extent to which you saw the rise and fall of the party on the ground in the second half of the twentieth century depended on where you were. Our research thus shines new light on the history of the party on the ground, in addition to underscoring the value of “bringing territory in” to the study of party organization.
该党在当地的地理位置:二十世纪后期意大利和瑞典的地方支部
关于西欧基层政党在20世纪兴衰的观点,是一些最有影响力的政党组织理论的核心。然而,由于政党本身提供的国家层面的数据参差不齐,加上学者们关注的是党员而不是分支机构,我们对政党结构的地理位置知之甚少。在本文中,我们通过一种不引人注目的方法——查阅历史电话簿——来解决这些问题,以确定各方在20世纪下半叶在意大利和瑞典投资当地分支机构的确切位置。我们的理论是,政党在全国范围内统一存在的程度取决于该国政治国有化的程度。利用空间滞后回归,我们发现我们的论点得到了强有力的支持:在国有化程度较低的意大利,政党对地方分支机构的投资遵循两个主要的基于地理的分裂——中心与外围,城市与农村——而在国有化程度较高的瑞典,它们在不同类型的地理区域中相对统一。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在20世纪下半叶,你在多大程度上看到了共和党的兴衰,这取决于你在哪里。因此,我们的研究在强调党组织研究“带域”价值的同时,也为基层党史提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书