Louise Bennett-Jones , Christopher D. Hepburn , Brendan Flack , Nigel J. Scott , Gaya Gnanalingam
{"title":"Integration of Indigenous practices into fisheries legislation: Obstacles and opportunities for the maramataka (Māori lunar calendar)","authors":"Louise Bennett-Jones , Christopher D. Hepburn , Brendan Flack , Nigel J. Scott , Gaya Gnanalingam","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are demonstrable ecological and social benefits of applying Indigenous knowledge in the management of natural resources. In New Zealand, establishment of customary fisheries management areas is, in part, to enable communities to apply local knowledge and practices in managing local resources. The management committee for a customary fisheries management area in southern New Zealand wishes to incorporate the maramataka (Māori lunar calendar) into the regulation of the pāua (blackfoot abalone, <em>Haliotis iris</em>) fishery. Like lunar calendars across the Pacific, the maramataka informed preferable times to undertake activities such as fishing for millennia. This knowledge is increasingly applied in a community-based setting, though barriers remain to its incorporation into central management policy. Interviews were conducted to investigate what fisheries management based on the maramataka might look like, and to analyse whether this would be possible through the existing legislative framework. Integration of the maramataka may be possible via a fishery closure and issuance of harvest authorisations, however several obstacles remain. Firstly, closures have only been approved for conservation of degraded fisheries, and not solely for introducing management measures for a healthy fishery. Secondly, distilling customary practices onto paperwork risks distorting the original practice, so a balance must be found between ensuring enforceability of new measures whilst retaining their ethos. Lastly, we argue that integration of Indigenous knowledge must go a step further, to integration of knowledge holders themselves in properly funded, resourced, and authorised managerial positions, rather than the use and enforcement of Indigenous knowledge and practices by non-Indigenous people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 106994"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25004105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are demonstrable ecological and social benefits of applying Indigenous knowledge in the management of natural resources. In New Zealand, establishment of customary fisheries management areas is, in part, to enable communities to apply local knowledge and practices in managing local resources. The management committee for a customary fisheries management area in southern New Zealand wishes to incorporate the maramataka (Māori lunar calendar) into the regulation of the pāua (blackfoot abalone, Haliotis iris) fishery. Like lunar calendars across the Pacific, the maramataka informed preferable times to undertake activities such as fishing for millennia. This knowledge is increasingly applied in a community-based setting, though barriers remain to its incorporation into central management policy. Interviews were conducted to investigate what fisheries management based on the maramataka might look like, and to analyse whether this would be possible through the existing legislative framework. Integration of the maramataka may be possible via a fishery closure and issuance of harvest authorisations, however several obstacles remain. Firstly, closures have only been approved for conservation of degraded fisheries, and not solely for introducing management measures for a healthy fishery. Secondly, distilling customary practices onto paperwork risks distorting the original practice, so a balance must be found between ensuring enforceability of new measures whilst retaining their ethos. Lastly, we argue that integration of Indigenous knowledge must go a step further, to integration of knowledge holders themselves in properly funded, resourced, and authorised managerial positions, rather than the use and enforcement of Indigenous knowledge and practices by non-Indigenous people.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.