Commercial and recreational fisher participation in marine fisheries management decision-making

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Marine Policy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106988
Rachel Bratton , Elizabeth Havice , Eric Wade
{"title":"Commercial and recreational fisher participation in marine fisheries management decision-making","authors":"Rachel Bratton ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Havice ,&nbsp;Eric Wade","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public participation in decision-making is increasingly recognized as a pillar of marine fisheries reform, credited with improving the legitimacy of management systems and contributing to the long-term sustainability of fish stocks. However, participatory approaches have been incorporated into management systems more quickly than research has been conducted into their functionality. Globally, it is uncertain whether common mechanisms for public participation in decision-making facilitate participation that meets stated goals or commitments. Using a case study in North Carolina, USA, we conducted a large-scale survey of commercial and recreational fishers to quantify levels of participation in decision-making and examine factors influencing participation across both groups. Participation was infrequent among both samples, with respondents participating less often than once every few years, on average. Commercial fishers participated more often and were more highly motivated to participate than recreational fishers. Factors influencing participation in decision-making were nuanced, with stakeholder understanding of the management system emerging as the only factor significantly, positively correlated to participation for both samples. Among commercial fishers, membership in a fishing organization also emerged as a significant positive predictor of participation, though fewer than half of commercial fishers belonged to a fishing organization. These findings identify gaps in stakeholder participation in decision-making and provide fisheries managers with baseline information needed to increase participation for two key stakeholder groups. Our evaluation provides managers with a framework to evaluate participation in other contexts, which is needed to assess progress made toward stated goals for stakeholder participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 106988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X2500404X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public participation in decision-making is increasingly recognized as a pillar of marine fisheries reform, credited with improving the legitimacy of management systems and contributing to the long-term sustainability of fish stocks. However, participatory approaches have been incorporated into management systems more quickly than research has been conducted into their functionality. Globally, it is uncertain whether common mechanisms for public participation in decision-making facilitate participation that meets stated goals or commitments. Using a case study in North Carolina, USA, we conducted a large-scale survey of commercial and recreational fishers to quantify levels of participation in decision-making and examine factors influencing participation across both groups. Participation was infrequent among both samples, with respondents participating less often than once every few years, on average. Commercial fishers participated more often and were more highly motivated to participate than recreational fishers. Factors influencing participation in decision-making were nuanced, with stakeholder understanding of the management system emerging as the only factor significantly, positively correlated to participation for both samples. Among commercial fishers, membership in a fishing organization also emerged as a significant positive predictor of participation, though fewer than half of commercial fishers belonged to a fishing organization. These findings identify gaps in stakeholder participation in decision-making and provide fisheries managers with baseline information needed to increase participation for two key stakeholder groups. Our evaluation provides managers with a framework to evaluate participation in other contexts, which is needed to assess progress made toward stated goals for stakeholder participation.
商业和休闲渔民参与海洋渔业管理决策
公众参与决策日益被认为是海洋渔业改革的一个支柱,有助于提高管理制度的合法性和促进鱼类资源的长期可持续性。但是,将参与性办法纳入管理系统的速度比对其功能进行研究的速度要快。在全球范围内,尚不确定公众参与决策的共同机制是否能促进实现既定目标或承诺的参与。以美国北卡罗来纳州为例,我们对商业渔民和休闲渔民进行了大规模调查,以量化决策参与水平,并检查影响这两个群体参与的因素。这两个样本的参与频率都不高,平均每隔几年受访者参与的频率低于一次。与休闲渔民相比,商业渔民参与的频率更高,参与的积极性也更高。影响决策参与的因素是微妙的,利益相关者对管理制度的理解是两个样本中唯一与参与显著正相关的因素。在商业渔民中,参与渔业组织的成员资格也成为参与的显著积极预测因素,尽管只有不到一半的商业渔民属于渔业组织。这些调查结果确定了利益相关者参与决策方面的差距,并为渔业管理者提供了提高两个关键利益相关者群体参与所需的基线信息。我们的评估为管理者提供了一个框架来评估其他情况下的参与,这是评估向利益相关者参与的既定目标所取得的进展所需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书