Social well-being moderates behavioral therapy response for generalized anxiety disorder

Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100160
Jacob D. Armstrong , Nicole R. Baughman , Ricardo A. Wilhelm , Dalia El-Shafie , Hannah Berg , Hung-Wen Yeh , Elisabeth Akeman , Christopher Martell , Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor , Michelle G. Craske , Martin P. Paulus , Robin Aupperle
{"title":"Social well-being moderates behavioral therapy response for generalized anxiety disorder","authors":"Jacob D. Armstrong ,&nbsp;Nicole R. Baughman ,&nbsp;Ricardo A. Wilhelm ,&nbsp;Dalia El-Shafie ,&nbsp;Hannah Berg ,&nbsp;Hung-Wen Yeh ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Akeman ,&nbsp;Christopher Martell ,&nbsp;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor ,&nbsp;Michelle G. Craske ,&nbsp;Martin P. Paulus ,&nbsp;Robin Aupperle","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3><u>Introduction</u></h3><div>Identifying moderators of treatment outcome for depression and anxiety offers promise for personalizing treatment or providing novel intervention targets. Indices of social well-being have emerged as candidate moderators due to their robust impact on mental health and quality of life. Here, we examine whether measures of social support, isolation, and loneliness moderate outcomes to behavioral activation (BA) and exposure-based therapy (EXP) for individuals with GAD.</div></div><div><h3><u>Methods</u></h3><div>This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 69 participants (31 EXP, 38 BA). Participants completed the GAD-7, along with NIH PROMIS (Depression; Social Isolation; and Emotional, Instrumental, and Informational Support) and NIH Toolbox (Friendship; Loneliness) scales. Regularized factor analysis identified two factors: social support and isolation/loneliness.</div></div><div><h3><u>Results</u></h3><div>Social support (<em>p</em> &lt; .001, η² = 0.19) and isolation/loneliness (<em>p</em> &lt; .001, η² = 0.33) improved over time, regardless of treatment condition. Lower baseline social support related to more GAD-7 improvement to BA and less improvement to EXP (<em>p</em> = 0.030, <em>d</em> = 0.17). Greater baseline isolation/loneliness related to more PROMIS Depression improvement to BA and less improvement to EXP (<em>p</em> = 0.025, <em>d</em> = 0.17). Individuals reporting baseline isolation/loneliness ≥ 0.22 standard deviations above the sample mean exhibited no significant depression symptom reduction with EXP.</div></div><div><h3><u>Conclusions</u></h3><div>Measures of social well-being moderate treatment outcome to behavioral therapy for GAD, providing valuable information for personalized treatment. Results suggest, for individuals reporting low social support and/or high isolation and loneliness, exposure-based treatment outcomes may benefit from early or adjunctive intervention strategies targeting social well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Identifying moderators of treatment outcome for depression and anxiety offers promise for personalizing treatment or providing novel intervention targets. Indices of social well-being have emerged as candidate moderators due to their robust impact on mental health and quality of life. Here, we examine whether measures of social support, isolation, and loneliness moderate outcomes to behavioral activation (BA) and exposure-based therapy (EXP) for individuals with GAD.

Methods

This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 69 participants (31 EXP, 38 BA). Participants completed the GAD-7, along with NIH PROMIS (Depression; Social Isolation; and Emotional, Instrumental, and Informational Support) and NIH Toolbox (Friendship; Loneliness) scales. Regularized factor analysis identified two factors: social support and isolation/loneliness.

Results

Social support (p < .001, η² = 0.19) and isolation/loneliness (p < .001, η² = 0.33) improved over time, regardless of treatment condition. Lower baseline social support related to more GAD-7 improvement to BA and less improvement to EXP (p = 0.030, d = 0.17). Greater baseline isolation/loneliness related to more PROMIS Depression improvement to BA and less improvement to EXP (p = 0.025, d = 0.17). Individuals reporting baseline isolation/loneliness ≥ 0.22 standard deviations above the sample mean exhibited no significant depression symptom reduction with EXP.

Conclusions

Measures of social well-being moderate treatment outcome to behavioral therapy for GAD, providing valuable information for personalized treatment. Results suggest, for individuals reporting low social support and/or high isolation and loneliness, exposure-based treatment outcomes may benefit from early or adjunctive intervention strategies targeting social well-being.
社会幸福感调节广泛性焦虑障碍的行为治疗反应
确定抑郁和焦虑治疗结果的调节因子为个性化治疗或提供新的干预目标提供了希望。由于社会福祉指数对心理健康和生活质量的强大影响,它们已成为候选调节因子。在这里,我们研究了社会支持、孤立和孤独感的测量是否对广广性焦虑症患者的行为激活(BA)和暴露治疗(EXP)的结果有调节作用。方法对69例随机临床试验进行二次分析(31例EXP, 38例BA)。参与者完成了GAD-7,以及NIH PROMIS(抑郁、社会孤立、情感、工具和信息支持)和NIH Toolbox(友谊、孤独)量表。正则化因素分析确定了两个因素:社会支持和孤立/孤独。结果社会支持(p <; )。001, η²= 0.19)和隔离/孤独(p <; )。001, η²= 0.33)随时间的推移而改善,无论治疗条件如何。较低的基线社会支持与更多的GAD-7改善BA和较少的改善EXP相关(p = 0.030,d = 0.17)。更大的基线隔离/孤独感与更多的PROMIS抑郁改善BA和较少的改善EXP相关(p = 0.025,d = 0.17)。报告基线隔离/孤独≥ 高于样本平均值0.22个标准差的个体,使用exp后抑郁症状没有显著减轻。结论:社会幸福感测量对行为治疗GAD的治疗效果中等,为个性化治疗提供了有价值的信息。结果表明,对于报告低社会支持和/或高度孤立和孤独的个人,基于暴露的治疗结果可能受益于针对社会福祉的早期或辅助干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书