Special drawing rights and ecological vulnerability: Monetary hierarchy and the translation of values

IF 4.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2025.100304
Nicolas Laurence
{"title":"Special drawing rights and ecological vulnerability: Monetary hierarchy and the translation of values","authors":"Nicolas Laurence","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) have regained prominence as international institutions search for ways to respond to recurring financial crises, rising inequalities, and accelerating climate change. As the only international reserve asset not tied to a national currency, SDRs have been debated as potential instruments for redistributive and ecological purposes, particularly since the unprecedented 650 billion USD allocation of 2021. Yet the terms of these debates reveal the persistent dominance of macro-financial logics over alternative framings. This article develops an analysis of how institutional discourses on SDR reform reflect and reproduce the tension between international monetary hierarchy and ecological vulnerability. It shows that ecological concerns are not absent from official debates but systematically translated into the language of liquidity, debt sustainability, and creditworthiness. Such translation renders ecological values legible while erasing their normative specificity, thereby constraining their transformative potential. By linking international political economy with social ecological economics, the article foregrounds the processes of inclusion, translation, and marginalisation through which plural values are managed in global monetary governance. SDRs thus serve less as instruments of ecological transition than as a diagnostic site for understanding the limits of integrating ecological criteria into a system still structured by financial stability and monetary hierarchy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811625000709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) have regained prominence as international institutions search for ways to respond to recurring financial crises, rising inequalities, and accelerating climate change. As the only international reserve asset not tied to a national currency, SDRs have been debated as potential instruments for redistributive and ecological purposes, particularly since the unprecedented 650 billion USD allocation of 2021. Yet the terms of these debates reveal the persistent dominance of macro-financial logics over alternative framings. This article develops an analysis of how institutional discourses on SDR reform reflect and reproduce the tension between international monetary hierarchy and ecological vulnerability. It shows that ecological concerns are not absent from official debates but systematically translated into the language of liquidity, debt sustainability, and creditworthiness. Such translation renders ecological values legible while erasing their normative specificity, thereby constraining their transformative potential. By linking international political economy with social ecological economics, the article foregrounds the processes of inclusion, translation, and marginalisation through which plural values are managed in global monetary governance. SDRs thus serve less as instruments of ecological transition than as a diagnostic site for understanding the limits of integrating ecological criteria into a system still structured by financial stability and monetary hierarchy.
特别提款权与生态脆弱性:货币等级制度与价值转换
随着国际机构寻求应对反复出现的金融危机、日益加剧的不平等和加速的气候变化的方法,特别提款权(sdr)重新获得了重视。作为唯一不与本国货币挂钩的国际储备资产,特别提款权一直被视为再分配和生态目的的潜在工具,尤其是自2021年史无前例的6500亿美元分配以来。然而,这些辩论的术语揭示了宏观金融逻辑对替代框架的持续主导地位。本文分析了关于特别提款权改革的制度话语如何反映和再现国际货币等级制度与生态脆弱性之间的紧张关系。它表明,生态问题并非缺席官方辩论,而是系统地转化为流动性、债务可持续性和信誉的语言。这样的翻译使生态价值变得清晰可辨,却抹去了它们的规范性特殊性,从而限制了它们的变革潜力。通过将国际政治经济学与社会生态经济学联系起来,文章展望了全球货币治理中多元价值管理的包容、翻译和边缘化过程。因此,特别提款权与其说是作为生态转型的工具,不如说是作为一个诊断站点,用于理解将生态标准整合到仍然由金融稳定和货币等级构成的体系中的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书