Influence of Strut Shape on the As-Built Quality and Mechanical Performance of Additively Manufactured Simple Cubic Lattices

IF 5.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Additive manufacturing letters Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100346
Derui Jiang , Darren Fraser , Sherman Wong , Timothy C. Hughes , Robert Wilson , Anthony B. Murphy , Vu Nguyen
{"title":"Influence of Strut Shape on the As-Built Quality and Mechanical Performance of Additively Manufactured Simple Cubic Lattices","authors":"Derui Jiang ,&nbsp;Darren Fraser ,&nbsp;Sherman Wong ,&nbsp;Timothy C. Hughes ,&nbsp;Robert Wilson ,&nbsp;Anthony B. Murphy ,&nbsp;Vu Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lattice structures made by additive manufacturing (AM) are being widely studied in the field of biomedical applications. Their strength and dimensional accuracy are critical to their performance. This study explores how different strut shapes affect the as-built quality and mechanical performance of Grade 23 titanium (Ti64) simple cubic lattices made by electron beam melting (EBM). Three strut cross-section geometries, square, octagonal, and round, were evaluated. Micro-computed tomography (CT) was used to assess dimensional deviations. Finite-element stress analysis predicted the mechanical response. Compression tests were conducted in two orientations to validate the models. Square struts showed the highest geometric accuracy and the best compressive strength, followed by the octagonal and round struts. These geometric deviations translated into mechanical trends: the square-strut lattices showed ∼10 – 20 % higher stiffness and yielding load compared with the round-strut equivalents, with the octagonal struts performing intermediately. These results suggest that square struts are better suited for load-bearing implants. The findings provide guidance for designing more reliable and effective lattice-based medical devices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369025000817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lattice structures made by additive manufacturing (AM) are being widely studied in the field of biomedical applications. Their strength and dimensional accuracy are critical to their performance. This study explores how different strut shapes affect the as-built quality and mechanical performance of Grade 23 titanium (Ti64) simple cubic lattices made by electron beam melting (EBM). Three strut cross-section geometries, square, octagonal, and round, were evaluated. Micro-computed tomography (CT) was used to assess dimensional deviations. Finite-element stress analysis predicted the mechanical response. Compression tests were conducted in two orientations to validate the models. Square struts showed the highest geometric accuracy and the best compressive strength, followed by the octagonal and round struts. These geometric deviations translated into mechanical trends: the square-strut lattices showed ∼10 – 20 % higher stiffness and yielding load compared with the round-strut equivalents, with the octagonal struts performing intermediately. These results suggest that square struts are better suited for load-bearing implants. The findings provide guidance for designing more reliable and effective lattice-based medical devices.
支撑形状对增材制造简单立方格的成形质量和力学性能的影响
增材制造(AM)制造的点阵结构在生物医学应用领域得到了广泛的研究。它们的强度和尺寸精度对它们的性能至关重要。本研究探讨了电子束熔炼(EBM)制备的23级钛(Ti64)简单立方晶格的不同支撑形状对竣工质量和力学性能的影响。评估了三种支柱截面几何形状,方形、八角形和圆形。显微计算机断层扫描(CT)用于评估尺寸偏差。有限元应力分析预测了力学响应。在两个方向上进行了压缩试验来验证模型。方形支撑的几何精度最高,抗压强度最好,其次是八角形支撑和圆形支撑。这些几何偏差转化为力学趋势:与圆形支撑相比,方形支撑的刚度和屈服载荷高出10 - 20%,而八角形支撑的表现居中。这些结果表明,方柱更适合于承重种植体。研究结果为设计更可靠、更有效的栅格医疗设备提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing letters
Additive manufacturing letters Materials Science (General), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书