{"title":"Perceiving emotion in human and AI voices: sensitivity to acoustic cues in Korean speech","authors":"Dayeon Yoon, Grace Eunhae Oh, Riley Kent","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emotional expressions in speech are often recognized rapidly, highlighting the central role of prosodic cues. However, less is known about how accurately listeners perceive emotion in AI-generated voices, particularly in relatively low-resource languages such as Korean. This study examined recognition of four emotions – <em>Happy, Sad, Angry,</em> and <em>Anxious</em> – in human- and AI-generated Korean speech. Thirty-six Korean listeners judged both the voice type (human vs. AI) and the emotional content of 64 utterances (32 human, 32 AI-generated), with lexical content controlled and stimuli matched by speaker. Human voices yielded higher recognition accuracy and faster response times than the AI voices. Among the emotions, <em>Happy</em> was recognized most accurately and <em>Anxious</em> least accurately, with the difficulty for <em>Anxious</em> especially pronounced in AI speech. Random forest analyses further revealed differences in cue reliance: recognition of human <em>Anxious</em> speech drew on a combination of pitch and intensity cues, whereas recognition of the AI <em>Anxious</em> speech was driven primarily by intensity variability, reflecting reliance on more salient and exaggerated acoustic features. These findings suggest that distinctions between human and AI-generated speech become most evident with complex emotions, as listeners are more sensitive to the subtle prosodic cues provided by human voices but often missing from synthetic ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 104083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125002086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emotional expressions in speech are often recognized rapidly, highlighting the central role of prosodic cues. However, less is known about how accurately listeners perceive emotion in AI-generated voices, particularly in relatively low-resource languages such as Korean. This study examined recognition of four emotions – Happy, Sad, Angry, and Anxious – in human- and AI-generated Korean speech. Thirty-six Korean listeners judged both the voice type (human vs. AI) and the emotional content of 64 utterances (32 human, 32 AI-generated), with lexical content controlled and stimuli matched by speaker. Human voices yielded higher recognition accuracy and faster response times than the AI voices. Among the emotions, Happy was recognized most accurately and Anxious least accurately, with the difficulty for Anxious especially pronounced in AI speech. Random forest analyses further revealed differences in cue reliance: recognition of human Anxious speech drew on a combination of pitch and intensity cues, whereas recognition of the AI Anxious speech was driven primarily by intensity variability, reflecting reliance on more salient and exaggerated acoustic features. These findings suggest that distinctions between human and AI-generated speech become most evident with complex emotions, as listeners are more sensitive to the subtle prosodic cues provided by human voices but often missing from synthetic ones.
期刊介绍:
Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.