Perceiving emotion in human and AI voices: sensitivity to acoustic cues in Korean speech

IF 1.6 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Lingua Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104083
Dayeon Yoon, Grace Eunhae Oh, Riley Kent
{"title":"Perceiving emotion in human and AI voices: sensitivity to acoustic cues in Korean speech","authors":"Dayeon Yoon,&nbsp;Grace Eunhae Oh,&nbsp;Riley Kent","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emotional expressions in speech are often recognized rapidly, highlighting the central role of prosodic cues. However, less is known about how accurately listeners perceive emotion in AI-generated voices, particularly in relatively low-resource languages such as Korean. This study examined recognition of four emotions – <em>Happy, Sad, Angry,</em> and <em>Anxious</em> – in human- and AI-generated Korean speech. Thirty-six Korean listeners judged both the voice type (human vs. AI) and the emotional content of 64 utterances (32 human, 32 AI-generated), with lexical content controlled and stimuli matched by speaker. Human voices yielded higher recognition accuracy and faster response times than the AI voices. Among the emotions, <em>Happy</em> was recognized most accurately and <em>Anxious</em> least accurately, with the difficulty for <em>Anxious</em> especially pronounced in AI speech. Random forest analyses further revealed differences in cue reliance: recognition of human <em>Anxious</em> speech drew on a combination of pitch and intensity cues, whereas recognition of the AI <em>Anxious</em> speech was driven primarily by intensity variability, reflecting reliance on more salient and exaggerated acoustic features. These findings suggest that distinctions between human and AI-generated speech become most evident with complex emotions, as listeners are more sensitive to the subtle prosodic cues provided by human voices but often missing from synthetic ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 104083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125002086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotional expressions in speech are often recognized rapidly, highlighting the central role of prosodic cues. However, less is known about how accurately listeners perceive emotion in AI-generated voices, particularly in relatively low-resource languages such as Korean. This study examined recognition of four emotions – Happy, Sad, Angry, and Anxious – in human- and AI-generated Korean speech. Thirty-six Korean listeners judged both the voice type (human vs. AI) and the emotional content of 64 utterances (32 human, 32 AI-generated), with lexical content controlled and stimuli matched by speaker. Human voices yielded higher recognition accuracy and faster response times than the AI voices. Among the emotions, Happy was recognized most accurately and Anxious least accurately, with the difficulty for Anxious especially pronounced in AI speech. Random forest analyses further revealed differences in cue reliance: recognition of human Anxious speech drew on a combination of pitch and intensity cues, whereas recognition of the AI Anxious speech was driven primarily by intensity variability, reflecting reliance on more salient and exaggerated acoustic features. These findings suggest that distinctions between human and AI-generated speech become most evident with complex emotions, as listeners are more sensitive to the subtle prosodic cues provided by human voices but often missing from synthetic ones.
人类和人工智能语音的情感感知:对韩国语语音线索的敏感性
言语中的情绪表达通常被迅速识别,这突出了韵律线索的核心作用。然而,人们对听者在人工智能生成的声音中感知情感的准确性知之甚少,尤其是在韩语等资源相对较少的语言中。这项研究考察了人类和人工智能生成的韩语语音对快乐、悲伤、愤怒和焦虑四种情绪的识别。36名韩国听众在词汇内容控制和刺激物匹配的情况下,对64个话语(人类32个,人工智能32个)的声音类型(人类vs人工智能)和情感内容进行了判断。与人工智能的声音相比,人类声音的识别精度更高,响应时间也更快。在这些情绪中,“快乐”的识别准确率最高,“焦虑”的识别准确率最低,在人工智能语音中,“焦虑”的识别难度尤其明显。随机森林分析进一步揭示了线索依赖的差异:对人类焦虑语音的识别利用了音调和强度线索的组合,而对人工智能焦虑语音的识别主要由强度变化驱动,反映了对更显著和夸张的声学特征的依赖。这些发现表明,人类和人工智能生成的语音之间的区别在复杂的情绪中表现得最为明显,因为听众对人类声音提供的微妙韵律线索更为敏感,而人工声音往往会忽略这些线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lingua
Lingua Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书