The influence of cognitive resource availability on evaluative conditioning consolidation

IF 2.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Pierre Lyon, Thierry Kosinski, Stephane Rusinek
{"title":"The influence of cognitive resource availability on evaluative conditioning consolidation","authors":"Pierre Lyon,&nbsp;Thierry Kosinski,&nbsp;Stephane Rusinek","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2025.100565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent evidence suggests that engaging visuospatial cognitive resources during the memory consolidation window can reduce the frequency of involuntary memories, without affecting voluntary recall. This study aimed to investigate the potential mechanisms underlying this effect. Through evaluative conditioning (EC) paradigm, we investigated whether such an intervention disrupts the consolidation of emotional valence acquired. Seventy-three participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (visuospatial, verbal, control) and completed a visual EC procedure in which neutral faces (CS) were paired with emotionally valenced images (US). Between CS-US pairings, participants completed one of the three tasks. Valence ratings were collected immediately after conditioning (short-term memory, STM) and again 24 h later (long-term memory, LTM), followed by a recognition task. Results showed robust EC effects in STM across all conditions. In LTM, EC effects persisted in control and verbal conditions but were eliminated in the visuospatial condition. Recognition performance did not differ across conditions, suggesting that associative memory was preserved. These findings support the hypothesis that mobilizing visuospatial resources during the consolidation window selectively disrupts the emotional aspect of memory without impairing associative memory content. Implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"36 2","pages":"Article 100565"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979125000459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that engaging visuospatial cognitive resources during the memory consolidation window can reduce the frequency of involuntary memories, without affecting voluntary recall. This study aimed to investigate the potential mechanisms underlying this effect. Through evaluative conditioning (EC) paradigm, we investigated whether such an intervention disrupts the consolidation of emotional valence acquired. Seventy-three participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (visuospatial, verbal, control) and completed a visual EC procedure in which neutral faces (CS) were paired with emotionally valenced images (US). Between CS-US pairings, participants completed one of the three tasks. Valence ratings were collected immediately after conditioning (short-term memory, STM) and again 24 h later (long-term memory, LTM), followed by a recognition task. Results showed robust EC effects in STM across all conditions. In LTM, EC effects persisted in control and verbal conditions but were eliminated in the visuospatial condition. Recognition performance did not differ across conditions, suggesting that associative memory was preserved. These findings support the hypothesis that mobilizing visuospatial resources during the consolidation window selectively disrupts the emotional aspect of memory without impairing associative memory content. Implications are discussed.
认知资源可得性对评价条件巩固的影响
最近的证据表明,在记忆巩固窗口期间使用视觉空间认知资源可以减少非自愿记忆的频率,而不会影响自愿回忆。本研究旨在探讨这种效应的潜在机制。通过评价条件反射(EC)范式,我们研究了这种干预是否会破坏获得性情绪效价的巩固。73名参与者被随机分配到三种条件(视觉空间,语言,控制)中的一种,并完成了视觉EC程序,其中中性面孔(CS)与情感价值图像(US)配对。在CS-US配对之间,参与者完成三个任务中的一个。在条件反射后立即收集效价评分(短期记忆),24小时后再次收集效价评分(长期记忆),然后进行识别任务。结果显示,在所有条件下,STM都具有强大的EC效应。在LTM中,EC效应在对照和语言条件下持续存在,但在视觉空间条件下被消除。识别表现在不同条件下没有差异,这表明联想记忆得到了保留。这些发现支持了一种假设,即在巩固期调动视觉空间资源会选择性地破坏记忆的情感方面,但不会损害联想记忆的内容。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书