Restricting impoliteness: (Re)asserting morality in third-party mediation of Chinese interpersonal conflict

IF 2.2 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Journal of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2025.11.004
Xiaoming Shang , Linlin Zhan , Chaoqun Xie
{"title":"Restricting impoliteness: (Re)asserting morality in third-party mediation of Chinese interpersonal conflict","authors":"Xiaoming Shang ,&nbsp;Linlin Zhan ,&nbsp;Chaoqun Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although recent scholarship on impoliteness has experienced a ‘moral turn’, limited attention has been paid to the pivotal role of morality in third-party mediation. Drawing on data from the Chinese television program, <em>Qiantang Lao Niangjiu</em> 钱塘老娘舅 (<em>The Maternal Uncle in Qiantang</em>), this study examines how moral frameworks operate to constrain impoliteness in interpersonal conflicts. The analysis reveals that the absent audiences of television mediation programs function both as moral supervisors and as recipients of moral education, whose perceived existence discourages interactants from engaging in impoliteness. Moreover, third-party mediators frequently employ two interrelated strategies—invoking latent and non-latent forms of morality—to regulate conflictual discourse. These strategies work by reinforcing behavioral norms through moral appeals and eliciting emotional resonance through shared values. These findings underscore the distinctive influence of television as a mediated communicative environment and the irreplaceable role of morality in restricting impoliteness. More broadly, this study advances our understanding of the dynamic interplay among impoliteness, mediation, and morality in multi-party interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"251 ","pages":"Pages 47-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625002620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although recent scholarship on impoliteness has experienced a ‘moral turn’, limited attention has been paid to the pivotal role of morality in third-party mediation. Drawing on data from the Chinese television program, Qiantang Lao Niangjiu 钱塘老娘舅 (The Maternal Uncle in Qiantang), this study examines how moral frameworks operate to constrain impoliteness in interpersonal conflicts. The analysis reveals that the absent audiences of television mediation programs function both as moral supervisors and as recipients of moral education, whose perceived existence discourages interactants from engaging in impoliteness. Moreover, third-party mediators frequently employ two interrelated strategies—invoking latent and non-latent forms of morality—to regulate conflictual discourse. These strategies work by reinforcing behavioral norms through moral appeals and eliciting emotional resonance through shared values. These findings underscore the distinctive influence of television as a mediated communicative environment and the irreplaceable role of morality in restricting impoliteness. More broadly, this study advances our understanding of the dynamic interplay among impoliteness, mediation, and morality in multi-party interaction.
限制不礼貌:(再)中国人际冲突第三方调解中的道德主张
尽管最近关于不礼貌的学术研究经历了“道德转向”,但人们对道德在第三方调解中的关键作用的关注有限。本研究利用中国电视节目《钱塘老娘娘学》的数据,探讨了道德框架如何在人际冲突中约束不礼貌行为。分析表明,电视调解节目中缺席的观众既是道德监督者,也是道德教育的接受者,他们的感知存在阻碍了互动者的不礼貌行为。此外,第三方调解人经常采用两种相互关联的策略——调用潜在的和非潜在的道德形式——来调节冲突话语。这些策略通过道德诉求来强化行为规范,通过共同价值观来引发情感共鸣。这些发现强调了电视作为媒介传播环境的独特影响,以及道德在限制不礼貌方面不可替代的作用。更广泛地说,本研究促进了我们对多方互动中不礼貌、调解和道德之间动态相互作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书