{"title":"Restricting impoliteness: (Re)asserting morality in third-party mediation of Chinese interpersonal conflict","authors":"Xiaoming Shang , Linlin Zhan , Chaoqun Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although recent scholarship on impoliteness has experienced a ‘moral turn’, limited attention has been paid to the pivotal role of morality in third-party mediation. Drawing on data from the Chinese television program, <em>Qiantang Lao Niangjiu</em> 钱塘老娘舅 (<em>The Maternal Uncle in Qiantang</em>), this study examines how moral frameworks operate to constrain impoliteness in interpersonal conflicts. The analysis reveals that the absent audiences of television mediation programs function both as moral supervisors and as recipients of moral education, whose perceived existence discourages interactants from engaging in impoliteness. Moreover, third-party mediators frequently employ two interrelated strategies—invoking latent and non-latent forms of morality—to regulate conflictual discourse. These strategies work by reinforcing behavioral norms through moral appeals and eliciting emotional resonance through shared values. These findings underscore the distinctive influence of television as a mediated communicative environment and the irreplaceable role of morality in restricting impoliteness. More broadly, this study advances our understanding of the dynamic interplay among impoliteness, mediation, and morality in multi-party interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"251 ","pages":"Pages 47-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625002620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although recent scholarship on impoliteness has experienced a ‘moral turn’, limited attention has been paid to the pivotal role of morality in third-party mediation. Drawing on data from the Chinese television program, Qiantang Lao Niangjiu 钱塘老娘舅 (The Maternal Uncle in Qiantang), this study examines how moral frameworks operate to constrain impoliteness in interpersonal conflicts. The analysis reveals that the absent audiences of television mediation programs function both as moral supervisors and as recipients of moral education, whose perceived existence discourages interactants from engaging in impoliteness. Moreover, third-party mediators frequently employ two interrelated strategies—invoking latent and non-latent forms of morality—to regulate conflictual discourse. These strategies work by reinforcing behavioral norms through moral appeals and eliciting emotional resonance through shared values. These findings underscore the distinctive influence of television as a mediated communicative environment and the irreplaceable role of morality in restricting impoliteness. More broadly, this study advances our understanding of the dynamic interplay among impoliteness, mediation, and morality in multi-party interaction.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.