Critical metrics for practical application-oriented rechargeable zinc-air batteries

IF 6.5 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.coelec.2025.101784
Zhongxi Zhao , Yongfu Liu , Jianwen Yu , Jiangfeng Huang , Junshuo Lian , Yaoming Leng , Peng Tan
{"title":"Critical metrics for practical application-oriented rechargeable zinc-air batteries","authors":"Zhongxi Zhao ,&nbsp;Yongfu Liu ,&nbsp;Jianwen Yu ,&nbsp;Jiangfeng Huang ,&nbsp;Junshuo Lian ,&nbsp;Yaoming Leng ,&nbsp;Peng Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.coelec.2025.101784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of rechargeable zinc-air batteries (RZABs) is hindered by sluggish oxygen reaction kinetics at air electrodes and poor reversibility of zinc electrodes. This work analyzes the fundamental issues limiting the practical implementation of RZABs and proposes a practical application-oriented performance evaluation framework. For air electrodes, in-situ gas monitoring techniques are critically needed to accurately distinguish the electrochemical reaction pathways during the charging process of transition metal catalysts and the competitive mechanisms between carbon corrosion and oxygen evolution reactions. With respect to zinc electrodes, conventional low depth of discharge (DOD) testing conditions mask irreversible capacity loss under practical high-DOD (&gt;20 %) operation, necessitating the establishment of a “limited zinc-high DOD” system to reliably assess electrode performance. Furthermore, full-cell design requires optimization of key parameters. The standardized evaluation framework proposed herein not only provides critical guidance for the industrialization of RZABs but also can be extended to other metal-air battery systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11028,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Electrochemistry","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101784"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Electrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451910325001437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of rechargeable zinc-air batteries (RZABs) is hindered by sluggish oxygen reaction kinetics at air electrodes and poor reversibility of zinc electrodes. This work analyzes the fundamental issues limiting the practical implementation of RZABs and proposes a practical application-oriented performance evaluation framework. For air electrodes, in-situ gas monitoring techniques are critically needed to accurately distinguish the electrochemical reaction pathways during the charging process of transition metal catalysts and the competitive mechanisms between carbon corrosion and oxygen evolution reactions. With respect to zinc electrodes, conventional low depth of discharge (DOD) testing conditions mask irreversible capacity loss under practical high-DOD (>20 %) operation, necessitating the establishment of a “limited zinc-high DOD” system to reliably assess electrode performance. Furthermore, full-cell design requires optimization of key parameters. The standardized evaluation framework proposed herein not only provides critical guidance for the industrialization of RZABs but also can be extended to other metal-air battery systems.
面向实际应用的可充电锌空气电池的关键指标
空气电极的氧反应动力学迟缓和锌电极的可逆性差阻碍了可充电锌-空气电池的应用。本文分析了限制RZABs实际实施的基本问题,并提出了一个面向实际应用的性能评估框架。对于空气电极,迫切需要现场气体监测技术来准确区分过渡金属催化剂充电过程中的电化学反应途径以及碳腐蚀和析氧反应之间的竞争机制。对于锌电极,传统的低放电深度(DOD)测试条件掩盖了实际高放电深度(> 20%)下的不可逆容量损失,需要建立“限锌-高放电深度”系统来可靠地评估电极性能。此外,全电池设计需要对关键参数进行优化。本文提出的标准化评价框架不仅对RZABs的产业化具有重要指导意义,而且可以推广到其他金属-空气电池体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
272
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: The development of the Current Opinion journals stemmed from the acknowledgment of the growing challenge for specialists to stay abreast of the expanding volume of information within their field. In Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, they help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: 1.The views of experts on current advances in electrochemistry in a clear and readable form. 2.Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications. In the realm of electrochemistry, the subject is divided into 12 themed sections, with each section undergoing an annual review cycle: • Bioelectrochemistry • Electrocatalysis • Electrochemical Materials and Engineering • Energy Storage: Batteries and Supercapacitors • Energy Transformation • Environmental Electrochemistry • Fundamental & Theoretical Electrochemistry • Innovative Methods in Electrochemistry • Organic & Molecular Electrochemistry • Physical & Nano-Electrochemistry • Sensors & Bio-sensors •
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书