Deep learning-based identification of carbonized seeds: A case study on Panicum miliaceum (Broomcorn Millet) and Setaria italica (Foxtail Millet)

IF 1.6 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Kaixin Huang , Zhaomeng Li , Dorothy Sack , Honghao Niu
{"title":"Deep learning-based identification of carbonized seeds: A case study on Panicum miliaceum (Broomcorn Millet) and Setaria italica (Foxtail Millet)","authors":"Kaixin Huang ,&nbsp;Zhaomeng Li ,&nbsp;Dorothy Sack ,&nbsp;Honghao Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbonized seeds recovered from archaeological sites are commonly identified through manual inspection, a time-consuming and low-throughput process. In particular, many fragmented carbonized seeds cannot be accurately identified by the naked eye. Among these, carbonized millet seeds are especially challenging due to their morphological similarity when charred. This study is the first in archaeobotany to apply and evaluate deep learning techniques for the automatic identification and species-level classification of carbonized millet seeds. A dataset comprising 3,000 images was constructed using modern <em>Panicum miliaceum</em> (broomcorn millet) and <em>Setaria italica</em> (foxtail millet) seeds in three different seed-condition image datasets: intact, fragmented, and carbonized. Three deep learning models—ResNet50d, YOLOv5s, and ViT-Tiny—were assessed systematically. The ResNet50d model performed best, and did so using carbonized seeds as a tranining set, achieving 95 % accuracy for distinguishing carbonized broomcorn millet and foxtail millet after a mere 3-hour training period, demonstrating its suitability for identifying the carbonized millet seeds. Notably, training with only 300 images per carbonized seed type (600 images in total) yielded stable F1-scores exceeding 90%, significantly reducing training costs. Comparative analyses across different seed-condition image datasets and image qualities revealed that carbonized seeds provided the most discriminating features. Removing image backgrounds further improved model accuracy. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed both the effectiveness and interpretability of the ResNet50d model. This study highlights the transformative potential of deep learning for automating carbonized seed identification at the species level, offering a practical and efficient approach for the analysis of archaeobotanical remains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 105537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2500570X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbonized seeds recovered from archaeological sites are commonly identified through manual inspection, a time-consuming and low-throughput process. In particular, many fragmented carbonized seeds cannot be accurately identified by the naked eye. Among these, carbonized millet seeds are especially challenging due to their morphological similarity when charred. This study is the first in archaeobotany to apply and evaluate deep learning techniques for the automatic identification and species-level classification of carbonized millet seeds. A dataset comprising 3,000 images was constructed using modern Panicum miliaceum (broomcorn millet) and Setaria italica (foxtail millet) seeds in three different seed-condition image datasets: intact, fragmented, and carbonized. Three deep learning models—ResNet50d, YOLOv5s, and ViT-Tiny—were assessed systematically. The ResNet50d model performed best, and did so using carbonized seeds as a tranining set, achieving 95 % accuracy for distinguishing carbonized broomcorn millet and foxtail millet after a mere 3-hour training period, demonstrating its suitability for identifying the carbonized millet seeds. Notably, training with only 300 images per carbonized seed type (600 images in total) yielded stable F1-scores exceeding 90%, significantly reducing training costs. Comparative analyses across different seed-condition image datasets and image qualities revealed that carbonized seeds provided the most discriminating features. Removing image backgrounds further improved model accuracy. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed both the effectiveness and interpretability of the ResNet50d model. This study highlights the transformative potential of deep learning for automating carbonized seed identification at the species level, offering a practical and efficient approach for the analysis of archaeobotanical remains.
基于深度学习的炭化种子识别——以粟粉(Panicum miliaceum)和粟粉(Setaria italica)为例
从考古遗址中回收的碳化种子通常通过人工检查来识别,这是一个耗时且低通量的过程。特别是许多碎片化的碳化种子,肉眼无法准确识别。其中,碳化谷子由于其烧焦时的形态相似性,尤其具有挑战性。本研究首次在考古植物学中应用深度学习技术对碳化谷子种子进行自动鉴定和种级分类。利用现代粟粟(Panicum miliaceum)和粟粟(Setaria italica)种子在完整、破碎和碳化三种不同种子状态下的图像数据集构建了包含3000幅图像的数据集。对resnet50d、YOLOv5s和viti - tin3种深度学习模型进行了系统评估。以碳化种子为训练集的ResNet50d模型表现最好,仅经过3小时的训练,就能识别出碳化的黍和谷子,准确率达到95%,证明了其识别碳化谷子种子的适用性。值得注意的是,每个碳化种子类型只有300张图像(总共600张图像)的训练产生了超过90%的稳定f1分数,显著降低了训练成本。通过对不同种子状态图像数据集和图像质量的比较分析发现,碳化种子提供了最具区别性的特征。去除图像背景进一步提高了模型的精度。Grad-CAM可视化证实了ResNet50d模型的有效性和可解释性。这项研究强调了深度学习在物种水平上自动化碳化种子鉴定的变革潜力,为考古植物遗骸的分析提供了一种实用而有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书