Carpal Tunnel Release Postoperative Pain Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.08.016
Saksham Pruthi BS , Justin Rehder BS , Matthew Toedt BS , Raymond Okeke MD , Brian Mailey MD
{"title":"Carpal Tunnel Release Postoperative Pain Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Saksham Pruthi BS ,&nbsp;Justin Rehder BS ,&nbsp;Matthew Toedt BS ,&nbsp;Raymond Okeke MD ,&nbsp;Brian Mailey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The management of postoperative pain after carpal tunnel release (CTR) has evolved over the years. This article reviews various approaches to pain management in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An electronic search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS for studies on CTR pain management using either preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative tools. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the narrative review. Articles included in the study evaluated patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, underwent CTR, and had preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative intervention evaluated as a primary end point. Duration and quantity of opioids, and patient-reported pain scales, such as the visual analog scale, were calculated and compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period between 2015 and 2022, 10 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Of these, studies were analyzed as either preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative means of managing pain. When these techniques were compared with opioid usage, no notable differences were found in pain ratings between patients who were given opioids for pain management compared with those provided with these nonopioid pain management options.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review highlights the effectiveness of various preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative interventions for pain management after CTR. Although opioids are the current standard for pain management after CTR, our study highlights interventions that are as effective, if not more so, as opioids at lowering pain scores with this procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The success of the studied alternatives in reducing pain outcomes for CTR can help mitigate the number of opioids prescribed to patients for the procedure. Given the current opioid epidemic plaguing the nation, understanding the efficacy of all other nonaddictive alternatives for pain management with CTR is imperative.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The management of postoperative pain after carpal tunnel release (CTR) has evolved over the years. This article reviews various approaches to pain management in the literature.

Methods

An electronic search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS for studies on CTR pain management using either preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative tools. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the narrative review. Articles included in the study evaluated patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, underwent CTR, and had preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative intervention evaluated as a primary end point. Duration and quantity of opioids, and patient-reported pain scales, such as the visual analog scale, were calculated and compared.

Results

During the study period between 2015 and 2022, 10 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Of these, studies were analyzed as either preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative means of managing pain. When these techniques were compared with opioid usage, no notable differences were found in pain ratings between patients who were given opioids for pain management compared with those provided with these nonopioid pain management options.

Conclusions

This review highlights the effectiveness of various preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative interventions for pain management after CTR. Although opioids are the current standard for pain management after CTR, our study highlights interventions that are as effective, if not more so, as opioids at lowering pain scores with this procedure.

Clinical relevance

The success of the studied alternatives in reducing pain outcomes for CTR can help mitigate the number of opioids prescribed to patients for the procedure. Given the current opioid epidemic plaguing the nation, understanding the efficacy of all other nonaddictive alternatives for pain management with CTR is imperative.
腕管释放术后疼痛管理:随机对照试验的系统回顾
目的多年来,腕管释放(CTR)术后疼痛的处理方法不断发展。这篇文章回顾了文献中疼痛管理的各种方法。方法通过PubMed、谷歌Scholar和SCOPUS进行电子检索,检索术前、围手术期和术后工具对CTR疼痛管理的研究。叙述性综述只纳入随机对照试验。纳入研究的文章评估了诊断为腕管综合征的患者,接受了CTR,并将术前、围手术期或术后干预作为主要终点进行评估。计算并比较阿片类药物的持续时间和数量,以及患者报告的疼痛量表,如视觉模拟量表。结果在2015 - 2022年的研究期间,有10项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。其中,研究被分析为术前、围手术期或术后治疗疼痛的方法。当将这些技术与阿片类药物的使用进行比较时,给予阿片类药物进行疼痛管理的患者与提供这些非阿片类药物疼痛管理选项的患者之间的疼痛评分没有显着差异。结论:本综述强调了CTR术后各种术前、围手术期和术后干预措施对疼痛管理的有效性。虽然阿片类药物是目前CTR后疼痛管理的标准,但我们的研究强调,在降低疼痛评分方面,与阿片类药物一样有效,如果不是更有效的话。临床相关性所研究的替代方案在减少CTR疼痛结果方面的成功可以帮助减少手术中给患者开的阿片类药物的数量。鉴于目前阿片类药物的流行困扰着国家,了解所有其他非成瘾性替代药物对CTR疼痛管理的功效是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书