Making failure desired during learning – A quasi-experimental study

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102094
Tanmay Sinha
{"title":"Making failure desired during learning – A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Tanmay Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One hundred and nineteen ninth-grade students engaged in one of two preparatory interventions – growth mindset or utility value – aimed at increasing the desirability of failure in learning during a quasi-experimental study. An additional fifty-one students participated in a control condition that offered no such preparation. Everyone then underwent a standard productive failure learning task where they ideated to solve an open-ended math problem prior to receiving a formal lecture on the targeted concept. Following mixed-methods analysis, my empirical results for the growth mindset and utility value conditions showed improvements in students’ beliefs about failure and their math expectancies, and similar persistence behaviors during problem-solving (compared to the control condition). Posttest performance following the lecture did not differ across the three conditions. With this work, I bring together complementary lines of research on low-cost and scalable motivational interventions in learning, typically applied to improve engagement with learning content, to contemporary learning sciences pedagogies like productive failure, in the novel service of making failure desired for students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102094"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125003414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One hundred and nineteen ninth-grade students engaged in one of two preparatory interventions – growth mindset or utility value – aimed at increasing the desirability of failure in learning during a quasi-experimental study. An additional fifty-one students participated in a control condition that offered no such preparation. Everyone then underwent a standard productive failure learning task where they ideated to solve an open-ended math problem prior to receiving a formal lecture on the targeted concept. Following mixed-methods analysis, my empirical results for the growth mindset and utility value conditions showed improvements in students’ beliefs about failure and their math expectancies, and similar persistence behaviors during problem-solving (compared to the control condition). Posttest performance following the lecture did not differ across the three conditions. With this work, I bring together complementary lines of research on low-cost and scalable motivational interventions in learning, typically applied to improve engagement with learning content, to contemporary learning sciences pedagogies like productive failure, in the novel service of making failure desired for students.
在学习过程中渴望失败-一项准实验研究
在一项准实验研究中,199名九年级学生参与了两种预备干预——成长心态或效用价值——中的一种,目的是增加对学习失败的渴望。另外51名学生参加了不提供这种准备的控制条件。然后,每个人都经历了一个标准的生产性失败学习任务,在接受关于目标概念的正式讲座之前,他们想要解决一个开放式的数学问题。在混合方法分析之后,我对成长心态和效用价值条件的实证结果显示,学生对失败的信念和他们的数学期望有所改善,在解决问题过程中也有类似的坚持行为(与控制条件相比)。讲座后的测试表现在三种情况下没有差异。通过这项工作,我将学习中的低成本和可扩展的动机干预研究(通常用于提高对学习内容的参与)与当代学习科学教学法(如生产性失败)结合起来,以新颖的服务使学生期望失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书