Automated Scoring of Question Complexity with Transformer Language Models

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102090
Tuval Raz , Simone A. Luchini , Roger E. Beaty , Yoed N. Kenett
{"title":"Automated Scoring of Question Complexity with Transformer Language Models","authors":"Tuval Raz ,&nbsp;Simone A. Luchini ,&nbsp;Roger E. Beaty ,&nbsp;Yoed N. Kenett","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Question-asking, an essential yet understudied activity, holds significant implications for learning, creativity, and cognitive development. Research shows that asking complex, open-ended questions is better for learning than closed ones. Previous research has explored open-ended question complexity through Bloom’s taxonomy, but the measurement of complexity remains challenging. Recent advancements in natural language processing have enabled automated scoring of psychological tasks aligned to human-ratings. However, automatic assessment of open-ended questions remains understudied. We address this gap by fine-tuning transformer language models to predict human ratings of open-ended question complexity and comparing them to existing baseline measures (i.e., word count and semantic distance). Using previously collected human-rated responses and Bloom ratings from a creative question-asking task, we trained an encoder model (RoBERTa) and a Large Language Model (Llama-2-7B). Our results reveal that RoBERTa correlated strongly with human ratings of complexity (r = .73), exceeding baseline measures and offering an efficient, lightweight solution suitable for broad adoption. Our fine-tuned LLaMA 2 model achieved stronger performance (r = .84), establishing a new benchmark for predictive accuracy. Thus, we demonstrate how language models can be utilized to automatically score the complexity of open-ended questions. Importantly, LLaMA 2 demonstrates higher accuracy, while RoBERTa provides a replicable, accessible, and cost-effective option for everyday educational and psychological applications. Our work paves the way for automatic assessment of open-ended questions, which are critical across a wide range of cognitive domains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102090"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125003384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question-asking, an essential yet understudied activity, holds significant implications for learning, creativity, and cognitive development. Research shows that asking complex, open-ended questions is better for learning than closed ones. Previous research has explored open-ended question complexity through Bloom’s taxonomy, but the measurement of complexity remains challenging. Recent advancements in natural language processing have enabled automated scoring of psychological tasks aligned to human-ratings. However, automatic assessment of open-ended questions remains understudied. We address this gap by fine-tuning transformer language models to predict human ratings of open-ended question complexity and comparing them to existing baseline measures (i.e., word count and semantic distance). Using previously collected human-rated responses and Bloom ratings from a creative question-asking task, we trained an encoder model (RoBERTa) and a Large Language Model (Llama-2-7B). Our results reveal that RoBERTa correlated strongly with human ratings of complexity (r = .73), exceeding baseline measures and offering an efficient, lightweight solution suitable for broad adoption. Our fine-tuned LLaMA 2 model achieved stronger performance (r = .84), establishing a new benchmark for predictive accuracy. Thus, we demonstrate how language models can be utilized to automatically score the complexity of open-ended questions. Importantly, LLaMA 2 demonstrates higher accuracy, while RoBERTa provides a replicable, accessible, and cost-effective option for everyday educational and psychological applications. Our work paves the way for automatic assessment of open-ended questions, which are critical across a wide range of cognitive domains.
使用转换语言模型的问题复杂性自动评分
提问是一项重要但尚未得到充分研究的活动,对学习、创造力和认知发展具有重要意义。研究表明,问复杂的、开放式的问题比封闭性的问题更有利于学习。以前的研究已经通过Bloom的分类法探索了开放式问题的复杂性,但复杂性的测量仍然具有挑战性。自然语言处理的最新进展使心理任务的自动评分与人类评分一致。然而,开放式问题的自动评估仍未得到充分研究。我们通过微调转换语言模型来预测人类对开放式问题复杂性的评分,并将其与现有的基线测量(即字数和语义距离)进行比较,从而解决了这一差距。利用之前收集的人类评分的回答和Bloom评分,我们训练了一个编码器模型(RoBERTa)和一个大型语言模型(Llama-2-7B)。我们的结果表明,RoBERTa与人类对复杂性的评价有很强的相关性(r = 0.73),超过了基线测量,并提供了一个有效的、轻量级的解决方案,适合广泛采用。我们的微调LLaMA 2模型获得了更强的性能(r = 0.84),为预测精度建立了新的基准。因此,我们演示了如何使用语言模型来自动对开放式问题的复杂性进行评分。重要的是,LLaMA 2显示出更高的准确性,而RoBERTa为日常教育和心理应用提供了可复制,可访问和成本效益高的选择。我们的工作为开放式问题的自动评估铺平了道路,这在广泛的认知领域至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书