Brianna G. Bowden , Brett Klamer , Robin Alexander , Mariah Eisner , Garey Noritz
{"title":"A comparative analysis of bone mineral density in cerebral palsy and spinal muscular atrophy","authors":"Brianna G. Bowden , Brett Klamer , Robin Alexander , Mariah Eisner , Garey Noritz","doi":"10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with immobility are at risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) and fragility fractures. This study investigates whether BMD differs between these two groups given their distinct pathological mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from non-ambulatory patients diagnosed with CP (GMFCS IV-V) and SMA (type I–II), aged five years and older, who were seen at a metabolic bone clinic between January 2012 and July 2023. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessed BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and lateral distal femur (LDF), region 3 (R3). Z-scores were calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 274 children with CP and 16 with SMA. Unadjusted LS Z-scores were low and comparable in both groups (CP: −2.3, SMA: −2.6; p = 0.7). After adjusting for height, LS Z-scores were in the normal range (CP: −0.9, SMA: −1.6; p = 0.3). However, the SMA group had significantly lower BMD in R3 of the LDF compared to the CP group (CP: −2.9, SMA: −3.9; p = 0.047).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both groups had normal height adjusted LS BMD and low R3 LDF BMD, with the SMA group significantly lower. We theorize that it may be due to the differences in muscle tonicity on the bone. We recommend including the distal femur bone density in routine bone health assessments and that BMD should be adjusted for height when possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9043,"journal":{"name":"Bone Reports","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187225000683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with immobility are at risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) and fragility fractures. This study investigates whether BMD differs between these two groups given their distinct pathological mechanisms.
Methods
Data were collected from non-ambulatory patients diagnosed with CP (GMFCS IV-V) and SMA (type I–II), aged five years and older, who were seen at a metabolic bone clinic between January 2012 and July 2023. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessed BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and lateral distal femur (LDF), region 3 (R3). Z-scores were calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Results
This study included 274 children with CP and 16 with SMA. Unadjusted LS Z-scores were low and comparable in both groups (CP: −2.3, SMA: −2.6; p = 0.7). After adjusting for height, LS Z-scores were in the normal range (CP: −0.9, SMA: −1.6; p = 0.3). However, the SMA group had significantly lower BMD in R3 of the LDF compared to the CP group (CP: −2.9, SMA: −3.9; p = 0.047).
Conclusion
Both groups had normal height adjusted LS BMD and low R3 LDF BMD, with the SMA group significantly lower. We theorize that it may be due to the differences in muscle tonicity on the bone. We recommend including the distal femur bone density in routine bone health assessments and that BMD should be adjusted for height when possible.
Bone ReportsMedicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
Bone Reports is an interdisciplinary forum for the rapid publication of Original Research Articles and Case Reports across basic, translational and clinical aspects of bone and mineral metabolism. The journal publishes papers that are scientifically sound, with the peer review process focused principally on verifying sound methodologies, and correct data analysis and interpretation. We welcome studies either replicating or failing to replicate a previous study, and null findings. We fulfil a critical and current need to enhance research by publishing reproducibility studies and null findings.