Misconceptions and advances in sustainable biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea in grapevines. A review

IF 3.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Crop Protection Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107515
José Luis Padilla-Agudelo , Elena Palencia Mulero , Gianluigi Cardinali , Jesús Manuel Cantoral , Gustavo Cordero-Bueso , Ileana Vigentini
{"title":"Misconceptions and advances in sustainable biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea in grapevines. A review","authors":"José Luis Padilla-Agudelo ,&nbsp;Elena Palencia Mulero ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Cardinali ,&nbsp;Jesús Manuel Cantoral ,&nbsp;Gustavo Cordero-Bueso ,&nbsp;Ileana Vigentini","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gray mold, caused by the necrotrophic fungus <em>Botrytis cinerea</em>, is among the most destructive diseases of grapevine, with yield losses that can exceed 40–70 % depending on cultivar, climate and post-harvest handling. Growing fungicide resistance and policy-driven reductions in the use of synthetic pesticides further tighten control options, creating an urgent need for eco-friendly alternatives. Biological control agents (BCAs), including antagonistic yeasts, bacteria and filamentous fungi, address this need; however, their field performance is often inconsistent and misconceptions persist about pathogen ecology, optimal application timing and regulatory requirements.</div><div>This review consolidates recent progress in sustainable biocontrol of gray mold and analyses how four biocontrol-enhancing attributes: (i) antagonist diversity, (ii) solo <em>versus</em> consortium applications, (iii) protective formulations, and (iv) risk-aligned spray timing guided by disease-forecast models. The key findings are as follows: 1) new insights into multitrophic interactions now guide targeted strain selection; 2) precision-application technologies align BCA delivery with pathogen risk windows, reducing product losses; 3) innovative formulations and well-designed microbial consortia extend persistence under field stress; 4) epidemiological modelling reveals climate-driven shifts in gray-mold pressure and their implications for BCA success; and 5) adoption barriers can be lowered through harmonized regulation and grower education. Combining these attributes results in mean reductions in bunch-rot severity, outlining a credible pathway toward reliable, pesticide-sparing management of <em>B. cinerea</em> and supporting the transition to more sustainable viticulture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425004077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gray mold, caused by the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, is among the most destructive diseases of grapevine, with yield losses that can exceed 40–70 % depending on cultivar, climate and post-harvest handling. Growing fungicide resistance and policy-driven reductions in the use of synthetic pesticides further tighten control options, creating an urgent need for eco-friendly alternatives. Biological control agents (BCAs), including antagonistic yeasts, bacteria and filamentous fungi, address this need; however, their field performance is often inconsistent and misconceptions persist about pathogen ecology, optimal application timing and regulatory requirements.
This review consolidates recent progress in sustainable biocontrol of gray mold and analyses how four biocontrol-enhancing attributes: (i) antagonist diversity, (ii) solo versus consortium applications, (iii) protective formulations, and (iv) risk-aligned spray timing guided by disease-forecast models. The key findings are as follows: 1) new insights into multitrophic interactions now guide targeted strain selection; 2) precision-application technologies align BCA delivery with pathogen risk windows, reducing product losses; 3) innovative formulations and well-designed microbial consortia extend persistence under field stress; 4) epidemiological modelling reveals climate-driven shifts in gray-mold pressure and their implications for BCA success; and 5) adoption barriers can be lowered through harmonized regulation and grower education. Combining these attributes results in mean reductions in bunch-rot severity, outlining a credible pathway toward reliable, pesticide-sparing management of B. cinerea and supporting the transition to more sustainable viticulture.
葡萄葡萄灰霉病可持续生物防治的误区与进展。回顾
灰霉病由坏死性真菌灰霉病(Botrytis cinerea)引起,是葡萄最具破坏性的病害之一,根据品种、气候和收获后处理的不同,产量损失可超过40 - 70%。杀菌剂耐药性的增长和政策驱动下合成农药使用的减少进一步收紧了控制选择,迫切需要生态友好的替代品。生物防治剂(bca),包括拮抗酵母菌、细菌和丝状真菌,满足了这一需求;然而,它们的现场表现往往不一致,并且对病原体生态学、最佳应用时间和监管要求仍然存在误解。本文综述了灰霉病可持续生物防治的最新进展,并分析了四种生物防治增强属性:(i)拮抗剂多样性,(ii)单独应用与联合应用,(iii)保护性配方,以及(iv)疾病预测模型指导下与风险一致的喷雾时机。主要发现如下:1)对多营养相互作用的新认识为有针对性的菌株选择提供了指导;2)精准应用技术使BCA递送与病原体风险窗口对齐,减少产品损失;3)创新配方和精心设计的微生物群落延长了田间胁迫下的持久性;4)流行病学模型揭示了气候驱动的灰霉菌压力变化及其对BCA成功的影响;5)通过协调监管和种植者教育可以降低采用障碍。结合这些特性,束腐病的严重程度平均降低,勾勒出一条可靠的、农药节约管理的可靠途径,并支持向更可持续的葡萄栽培过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书