Decision-making under uncertainty for LT-ATES systems in complex subsurface settings: application to a low-transmissivity aquifer

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Advances in Water Resources Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.105193
Luka Tas , Jef Caers , Thomas Hermans
{"title":"Decision-making under uncertainty for LT-ATES systems in complex subsurface settings: application to a low-transmissivity aquifer","authors":"Luka Tas ,&nbsp;Jef Caers ,&nbsp;Thomas Hermans","doi":"10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.105193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage systems (LT-ATES) store excess thermal energy in the subsurface and recover it when needed to heat and cool buildings sustainably. Complex subsurface settings are increasingly targeted for storage. Existing design guidelines cannot be readily applied because they were developed for homogeneous sandy aquifers. In complex settings, subsurface uncertainty translates into uncertainty about system feasibility or efficiency. This paper introduces a method to establish a decision tree for ATES based on uncertainty analysis. It combines Monte Carlo simulations of groundwater flow and heat transport with sensitivity analysis, joint probability distribution estimation and kernel density estimation. For illustration the method is applied to a low-transmissivity aquifer where hydraulic and thermal feasibility are the main prediction targets. Sensitivity analyses based on clustering reveal the impact of model parameters and engineering actions on both prediction targets. In the specific case study, we find for example that storage conditions with transmissivity below 20 m²/d lead to inefficient systems. Desirable storage conditions have transmissivity above 40 m²/d, while intermediate values require thorough risk analysis. Thermal breakthrough risk is higher when longitudinal dispersivity is above 3 m. Further, our approach results in some minimum requirements in terms of subsurface properties that have to be reached for which an investment is justified. On top, the decision tree proposes target engineering actions to decrease investment risk while optimizing return. As such, the proposed method effectively guides early investment decisions for LT-ATES in complex subsurface settings without requiring field data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7614,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Water Resources","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 105193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Water Resources","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309170825003070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage systems (LT-ATES) store excess thermal energy in the subsurface and recover it when needed to heat and cool buildings sustainably. Complex subsurface settings are increasingly targeted for storage. Existing design guidelines cannot be readily applied because they were developed for homogeneous sandy aquifers. In complex settings, subsurface uncertainty translates into uncertainty about system feasibility or efficiency. This paper introduces a method to establish a decision tree for ATES based on uncertainty analysis. It combines Monte Carlo simulations of groundwater flow and heat transport with sensitivity analysis, joint probability distribution estimation and kernel density estimation. For illustration the method is applied to a low-transmissivity aquifer where hydraulic and thermal feasibility are the main prediction targets. Sensitivity analyses based on clustering reveal the impact of model parameters and engineering actions on both prediction targets. In the specific case study, we find for example that storage conditions with transmissivity below 20 m²/d lead to inefficient systems. Desirable storage conditions have transmissivity above 40 m²/d, while intermediate values require thorough risk analysis. Thermal breakthrough risk is higher when longitudinal dispersivity is above 3 m. Further, our approach results in some minimum requirements in terms of subsurface properties that have to be reached for which an investment is justified. On top, the decision tree proposes target engineering actions to decrease investment risk while optimizing return. As such, the proposed method effectively guides early investment decisions for LT-ATES in complex subsurface settings without requiring field data.
复杂地下环境中LT-ATES系统的不确定性决策:在低透射率含水层中的应用
低温含水层热能储存系统(LT-ATES)将多余的热能储存在地下,并在需要时回收,以可持续地加热和冷却建筑物。复杂的地下环境越来越多地成为存储的目标。现有的设计准则不能轻易适用,因为它们是针对均质砂质含水层制定的。在复杂的环境中,地下的不确定性转化为系统可行性或效率的不确定性。介绍了一种基于不确定性分析的ATES决策树的建立方法。它将蒙特卡罗模拟地下水流动和热输运与灵敏度分析、联合概率分布估计和核密度估计相结合。为了说明该方法应用于低透射率含水层,其中水力和热可行性是主要预测目标。基于聚类的敏感性分析揭示了模型参数和工程行为对两个预测目标的影响。在具体的案例研究中,我们发现,例如,传输率低于20 m²/d的存储条件会导致系统效率低下。理想的储存条件下,透过率应高于40 m²/d,而中间值则需要进行彻底的风险分析。当纵向分散度大于3 m时,热突破风险较高。此外,我们的方法在地下属性方面产生了一些最低要求,必须达到这些要求才能证明投资是合理的。决策树提出目标工程行动,以降低投资风险,同时优化收益。因此,所提出的方法可以有效地指导LT-ATES在复杂地下环境中的早期投资决策,而无需现场数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Water Resources
Advances in Water Resources 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
171
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Water Resources provides a forum for the presentation of fundamental scientific advances in the understanding of water resources systems. The scope of Advances in Water Resources includes any combination of theoretical, computational, and experimental approaches used to advance fundamental understanding of surface or subsurface water resources systems or the interaction of these systems with the atmosphere, geosphere, biosphere, and human societies. Manuscripts involving case studies that do not attempt to reach broader conclusions, research on engineering design, applied hydraulics, or water quality and treatment, as well as applications of existing knowledge that do not advance fundamental understanding of hydrological processes, are not appropriate for Advances in Water Resources. Examples of appropriate topical areas that will be considered include the following: • Surface and subsurface hydrology • Hydrometeorology • Environmental fluid dynamics • Ecohydrology and ecohydrodynamics • Multiphase transport phenomena in porous media • Fluid flow and species transport and reaction processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书