Forest biodiversity indicators correlate with perceived forest qualities but not with psychological well-being in urban forests

IF 8.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129219
Aku Korhonen, Jenni Simkin, Ann Ojala, Marjo Neuvonen, Mathilda Kauppila, Leena Hamberg
{"title":"Forest biodiversity indicators correlate with perceived forest qualities but not with psychological well-being in urban forests","authors":"Aku Korhonen,&nbsp;Jenni Simkin,&nbsp;Ann Ojala,&nbsp;Marjo Neuvonen,&nbsp;Mathilda Kauppila,&nbsp;Leena Hamberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Provision of recreational opportunities and biodiversity are among the most significant values associated with urban forests in Nordic cities. However, catering to both demands with a limited forest area can result in conflicts, which need to be accounted for in urban forest management and land-use planning. In this study, we examined associations between forest biodiversity and on-site experiences of city residents (n = 153) in spruce-dominated urban forests (n = 15) in five Finnish cities. Biodiversity values were assessed from four complementary perspectives including (1) tree species admixture, (2) abundance of dead wood, (3) heterogeneity of ground vegetation, and (4) late-successional ectomycorrhizal fungal richness in the soil. People's experiences were investigated in terms of perceived forest quality and change in felt restoration and energy level before and after the forest visit. We found several correlations between people's perceptions of forest quality and measured biodiversity indicators. The correlations indicated mostly synergistic relationships between forest biodiversity and human preferences. Yet, differences in biodiversity indicators were not reflected in felt restoration or energy level changes. Our results suggest that promoting forest structural features that benefit biodiversity in boreal spruce-dominated forests is mostly in line with urban residents' preferences regarding forest qualities, but that management within forests should enable easy passage through them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 129219"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725005539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Provision of recreational opportunities and biodiversity are among the most significant values associated with urban forests in Nordic cities. However, catering to both demands with a limited forest area can result in conflicts, which need to be accounted for in urban forest management and land-use planning. In this study, we examined associations between forest biodiversity and on-site experiences of city residents (n = 153) in spruce-dominated urban forests (n = 15) in five Finnish cities. Biodiversity values were assessed from four complementary perspectives including (1) tree species admixture, (2) abundance of dead wood, (3) heterogeneity of ground vegetation, and (4) late-successional ectomycorrhizal fungal richness in the soil. People's experiences were investigated in terms of perceived forest quality and change in felt restoration and energy level before and after the forest visit. We found several correlations between people's perceptions of forest quality and measured biodiversity indicators. The correlations indicated mostly synergistic relationships between forest biodiversity and human preferences. Yet, differences in biodiversity indicators were not reflected in felt restoration or energy level changes. Our results suggest that promoting forest structural features that benefit biodiversity in boreal spruce-dominated forests is mostly in line with urban residents' preferences regarding forest qualities, but that management within forests should enable easy passage through them.
森林生物多样性指标与感知森林质量相关,但与城市森林的心理健康无关
提供娱乐机会和生物多样性是北欧城市森林最重要的价值。但是,以有限的森林面积来满足这两种需求可能导致冲突,这需要在城市森林管理和土地使用规划中加以考虑。在这项研究中,我们研究了芬兰5个城市云杉为主的城市森林(n = 15)中森林生物多样性与城市居民(n = 153)的现场体验之间的关系。生物多样性价值从四个互补的角度进行评估,包括(1)树种混合度,(2)枯木丰度,(3)地面植被异质性,(4)土壤中晚演替外生菌根真菌丰富度。调查了人们在森林参观前后对森林质量的感知以及感觉恢复和能量水平的变化。我们发现人们对森林质量的看法与测量的生物多样性指标之间存在一些相关性。相关性表明森林生物多样性与人类偏好之间存在协同关系。然而,生物多样性指标的差异并未反映在感觉恢复或能量水平变化中。我们的研究结果表明,在北方云杉为主的森林中,促进有利于生物多样性的森林结构特征与城市居民对森林质量的偏好基本一致,但森林内的管理应使森林易于通行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书