Evaluation of antibiotic consumption in Intensive Care Units of a teaching hospital based on defined daily dose metrics and WHO Access, Watch, Reserve classification framework.

IF 1.2
Journal of postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_628_25
B Thapa, S Datta, D K Sharma
{"title":"Evaluation of antibiotic consumption in Intensive Care Units of a teaching hospital based on defined daily dose metrics and WHO Access, Watch, Reserve classification framework.","authors":"B Thapa, S Datta, D K Sharma","doi":"10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_628_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a global public health crisis. The WHO Global Action Plan and India's National Action Plan on AMR underscore the rational use of antibiotics in healthcare settings as a critical strategy for mitigating AMR. Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are high-risk environments for development of AMR. This study analyzes baseline antibiotic utilization data in ICUs by applying the defined daily dose (DDD) metrics in the context of the 'Access', 'Watch', 'Reserve' (AWaRe) classification framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted over a 12-month period. Data from patients prescribed antibacterials for systemic use during their stay in the medicine, surgery, and neurosurgery ICUs were included. Antibiotic utilization was analyzed using daily dose metrics and the WHO AWaRe framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 359 eligible ICU patients were analyzed. The DU75% segment included 'Watch' category antibiotics, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and 'Access' category antibiotics, metronidazole and doxycycline. 'Watch' category antibiotics were used most frequently, with a cumulative DDD/100 patient days of 71.8. This was followed by the 'Access' category with a cumulative DDD/100 patient days of 48. The use of 'Watch' category antibiotics in the NSICU was significantly higher than in other ICUs ( P < 0.005, χ2 = 7.8). Antibiotics were used mostly for prophylaxis (59%), followed by empirical (28.4%) and definitive therapy (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates excessive use of 'Watch' antibiotics and a relative underuse of 'Access' agents in ICUs, emphasizing the scope for implementing robust stewardship measures including culture-guided de-escalation, formulary restriction of broad-spectrum agents, and implementing stringent surgical prophylaxis protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":94105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"163-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12753038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_628_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a global public health crisis. The WHO Global Action Plan and India's National Action Plan on AMR underscore the rational use of antibiotics in healthcare settings as a critical strategy for mitigating AMR. Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are high-risk environments for development of AMR. This study analyzes baseline antibiotic utilization data in ICUs by applying the defined daily dose (DDD) metrics in the context of the 'Access', 'Watch', 'Reserve' (AWaRe) classification framework.

Materials and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over a 12-month period. Data from patients prescribed antibacterials for systemic use during their stay in the medicine, surgery, and neurosurgery ICUs were included. Antibiotic utilization was analyzed using daily dose metrics and the WHO AWaRe framework.

Results: Data from 359 eligible ICU patients were analyzed. The DU75% segment included 'Watch' category antibiotics, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and 'Access' category antibiotics, metronidazole and doxycycline. 'Watch' category antibiotics were used most frequently, with a cumulative DDD/100 patient days of 71.8. This was followed by the 'Access' category with a cumulative DDD/100 patient days of 48. The use of 'Watch' category antibiotics in the NSICU was significantly higher than in other ICUs ( P < 0.005, χ2 = 7.8). Antibiotics were used mostly for prophylaxis (59%), followed by empirical (28.4%) and definitive therapy (13%).

Conclusions: The study demonstrates excessive use of 'Watch' antibiotics and a relative underuse of 'Access' agents in ICUs, emphasizing the scope for implementing robust stewardship measures including culture-guided de-escalation, formulary restriction of broad-spectrum agents, and implementing stringent surgical prophylaxis protocols.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于限定日剂量指标和世卫组织获取、观察、储备分类框架的某教学医院重症监护病房抗生素消耗评估
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个全球性的公共卫生危机。世卫组织《抗微生物药物耐药性全球行动计划》和印度《抗微生物药物耐药性国家行动计划》强调,在卫生保健环境中合理使用抗生素是减轻抗微生物药物耐药性的一项关键战略。重症监护病房(icu)是抗生素耐药性发展的高风险环境。本研究通过在“获取”、“观察”、“储备”(AWaRe)分类框架下应用定义日剂量(DDD)指标,分析了icu的基线抗生素使用数据。材料和方法:本前瞻性观察研究为期12个月。患者在内科、外科和神经外科icu住院期间全身性使用抗菌药物的数据被纳入。使用日剂量指标和世卫组织AWaRe框架分析抗生素使用情况。结果:对359例符合条件的ICU患者进行数据分析。DU75%部分包括“观察”类抗生素、头孢曲松、美罗培南和“获取”类抗生素、甲硝唑和强力霉素。“观察”类抗生素使用频率最高,累计DDD/100患者日为71.8。紧随其后的是“无障碍”类别,累计DDD/100患者日为48。NSICU“Watch”类抗生素使用率显著高于其他icu (P < 0.005, χ2 = 7.8)。抗生素主要用于预防(59%),其次是经验性(28.4%)和决定性治疗(13%)。结论:该研究表明icu中“观察”抗生素的过度使用和“获取”药物的相对不足,强调了实施强有力的管理措施的范围,包括以培养为指导的降药、广谱药物的处方限制以及实施严格的手术预防方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书