Effective self-directed learning and performance perception: Insights from the United Kingdom National Undergraduate neuroanatomy competition

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111778
Ameerah Gardee , Eranga Goonewardena , Sytske Lub , Hassan Ismahel , Attika Chaudhary , Laulwa Nasser Al-Salloum , Devansh Mitesh Shah , Sanskar Ranglani , Samih Hassan , Mohammad Ashraf , Scott Border
{"title":"Effective self-directed learning and performance perception: Insights from the United Kingdom National Undergraduate neuroanatomy competition","authors":"Ameerah Gardee ,&nbsp;Eranga Goonewardena ,&nbsp;Sytske Lub ,&nbsp;Hassan Ismahel ,&nbsp;Attika Chaudhary ,&nbsp;Laulwa Nasser Al-Salloum ,&nbsp;Devansh Mitesh Shah ,&nbsp;Sanskar Ranglani ,&nbsp;Samih Hassan ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ashraf ,&nbsp;Scott Border","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neuroanatomy is a cornerstone of medical education, yet is perceived by many as daunting. Student-led events, such as the National Undergraduate Neuroanatomy Competition (NUNC), newly re-established in Scotland, provides a platform to address this challenge by fostering academic interest and enhancing learning through extracurricular achievement and specialty talks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods study analysed data from the 11th NUNC, involving 93 registered medical students. Post-event surveys collated participants’ experiences with institutional neuroanatomy education, preferred learning resources, and self-assessment of their performance in NUNC’s written and practical exams. Quantitative responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data provided insights into learning preferences and challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 58 survey respondents, most reported dissatisfaction with the depth and accessibility of institutional neuroanatomy teaching. Online resources (74.1 %) and textbooks (53.4 %) were most frequently used for self-directed learning, in addition to resources provided by students’ institutions. Participants rated both the single-best-answer and spotter exams as difficult, and demonstrated accurate self-assessment of their performance, with modest but significant correlations between perceived and actual scores in both assessments (p = 0.0002).</div><div>These findings highlight a potential dichotomy between reliance on institutional teaching and students’ preferred resources, emphasising the value of supplementary, accessible, and clinically contextualised materials in the learning of future clinicians. Accuracy in self-assessment suggests that NUNC encourages reflective learning and confidence in neuroanatomy knowledge. This has positive implications for the future clinical practice of these participants as it is increasingly common for non-specialist clinicians to be first point-of-contact for neurological presentations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NUNC provides an impactful platform for addressing gaps in neuroanatomy/clinical neuroscience education, promoting self-directed learning, and inspiring confidence among students interested in careers in neuroanatomy-related fields such as neurosurgery, neurology and other neuroanatomy related fields. Future efforts should focus on integrating a broader range of learning modalities into medical curricula to improve the learning experience and establish reliable foundations for future clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 111778"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825007519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neuroanatomy is a cornerstone of medical education, yet is perceived by many as daunting. Student-led events, such as the National Undergraduate Neuroanatomy Competition (NUNC), newly re-established in Scotland, provides a platform to address this challenge by fostering academic interest and enhancing learning through extracurricular achievement and specialty talks.

Methods

This mixed-methods study analysed data from the 11th NUNC, involving 93 registered medical students. Post-event surveys collated participants’ experiences with institutional neuroanatomy education, preferred learning resources, and self-assessment of their performance in NUNC’s written and practical exams. Quantitative responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data provided insights into learning preferences and challenges.

Results

Of 58 survey respondents, most reported dissatisfaction with the depth and accessibility of institutional neuroanatomy teaching. Online resources (74.1 %) and textbooks (53.4 %) were most frequently used for self-directed learning, in addition to resources provided by students’ institutions. Participants rated both the single-best-answer and spotter exams as difficult, and demonstrated accurate self-assessment of their performance, with modest but significant correlations between perceived and actual scores in both assessments (p = 0.0002).
These findings highlight a potential dichotomy between reliance on institutional teaching and students’ preferred resources, emphasising the value of supplementary, accessible, and clinically contextualised materials in the learning of future clinicians. Accuracy in self-assessment suggests that NUNC encourages reflective learning and confidence in neuroanatomy knowledge. This has positive implications for the future clinical practice of these participants as it is increasingly common for non-specialist clinicians to be first point-of-contact for neurological presentations.

Conclusion

NUNC provides an impactful platform for addressing gaps in neuroanatomy/clinical neuroscience education, promoting self-directed learning, and inspiring confidence among students interested in careers in neuroanatomy-related fields such as neurosurgery, neurology and other neuroanatomy related fields. Future efforts should focus on integrating a broader range of learning modalities into medical curricula to improve the learning experience and establish reliable foundations for future clinical practice.
有效的自主学习和绩效感知:来自英国全国大学生神经解剖学竞赛的见解。
背景:神经解剖学是医学教育的基石,但被许多人认为是令人生畏的。学生主导的活动,如在苏格兰新成立的全国大学生神经解剖学竞赛(NUNC),通过培养学术兴趣和通过课外成就和专业讲座加强学习,为解决这一挑战提供了一个平台。方法:本混合方法研究分析了第11届NUNC的数据,涉及93名注册医学生。活动后调查整理了参与者在机构神经解剖学教育中的经历、首选的学习资源以及他们在NUNC笔试和实践考试中的自我评估。定量回答使用描述性和推断性统计进行分析,而定性数据提供了对学习偏好和挑战的见解。结果:在58名调查对象中,大多数人对机构神经解剖学教学的深度和可及性表示不满。在线资源(74.1%)和教科书(53.4%)是自主学习最常用的资源,此外还有学生所在机构提供的资源。参与者认为单一最佳答案和现场测试都很困难,并对自己的表现进行了准确的自我评估,两种评估中的感知得分和实际得分之间存在适度但显著的相关性(p = 0.0002)。这些发现突出了对机构教学的依赖和学生首选资源之间的潜在二分法,强调了补充的、可获得的和临床背景材料在未来临床医生学习中的价值。自我评估的准确性表明NUNC鼓励反思性学习和对神经解剖学知识的信心。这对这些参与者的未来临床实践具有积极意义,因为非专业临床医生成为神经学表现的第一接触点越来越普遍。结论:NUNC为解决神经解剖学/临床神经科学教育的空白提供了一个有影响力的平台,促进了自主学习,并激发了对神经解剖学相关领域(如神经外科、神经病学和其他神经解剖学相关领域)感兴趣的学生的信心。今后的努力应侧重于将更广泛的学习方式纳入医学课程,以改善学习经验,为今后的临床实践奠定可靠的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书