A systematic review of commencing full-dose antihypertensives in newly diagnosed hypertension.

IF 2.3 4区 医学
Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2025.2594268
Babu Karavadra, Alexander D Elia, Alena Shantsila, Gregory Y H Lip, Eduard Shantsila
{"title":"A systematic review of commencing full-dose antihypertensives in newly diagnosed hypertension.","authors":"Babu Karavadra, Alexander D Elia, Alena Shantsila, Gregory Y H Lip, Eduard Shantsila","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2025.2594268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is the UK's most common treatable cause of mortality and morbidity, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), renal disease and dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review has explored the efficacy and safety of commencing full-dose antihypertensive treatment in individuals with essential hypertension.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Method16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion, with some RCTs assessing more than one treatment. The review assessed commonly used antihypertensive drugs (perindopril 8 mg, ramipril 10 mg, amlodipine 10 mg, losartan 100 mg, irbesartan 300 mg, candesartan 16 mg and candesartan 32 mg) compared to low starting doses or placebo RCTs. Eligible studies included 12 RCTs that compared full vs low doses and 19 RCTs that compared full starting doses vs placebo. The primary outcome was the difference in blood pressure reduction compared to controls (reported or calculated). ResultsUsing full doses compared to low doses led to better BP reduction (overall, 3.9/2.2 mmHg lower achieved BP) without an increase in adverse effects. This notion is supported by the changes achieved with full-dose treatment initiation compared to placebo (average over all studies: 11.4 [4.4]/6.5 [2.9] mmHg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review indicates that initiating full-dose antihypertensives for essential hypertension may be beneficial and safe. The available data are limited, and further RCTs are required to assess this in specific patient groups to assess safety and efficac.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":" ","pages":"2594268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2025.2594268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is the UK's most common treatable cause of mortality and morbidity, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), renal disease and dementia.

Objective: This systematic review has explored the efficacy and safety of commencing full-dose antihypertensive treatment in individuals with essential hypertension.

Method: Method16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion, with some RCTs assessing more than one treatment. The review assessed commonly used antihypertensive drugs (perindopril 8 mg, ramipril 10 mg, amlodipine 10 mg, losartan 100 mg, irbesartan 300 mg, candesartan 16 mg and candesartan 32 mg) compared to low starting doses or placebo RCTs. Eligible studies included 12 RCTs that compared full vs low doses and 19 RCTs that compared full starting doses vs placebo. The primary outcome was the difference in blood pressure reduction compared to controls (reported or calculated). ResultsUsing full doses compared to low doses led to better BP reduction (overall, 3.9/2.2 mmHg lower achieved BP) without an increase in adverse effects. This notion is supported by the changes achieved with full-dose treatment initiation compared to placebo (average over all studies: 11.4 [4.4]/6.5 [2.9] mmHg).

Conclusions: This review indicates that initiating full-dose antihypertensives for essential hypertension may be beneficial and safe. The available data are limited, and further RCTs are required to assess this in specific patient groups to assess safety and efficac.

新诊断高血压开始全剂量抗高血压药物的系统回顾。
本系统综述探讨了原发性高血压患者开始全剂量降压治疗的有效性和安全性。16项随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入条件,其中一些RCT评估了不止一种治疗。该综述评估了常用的降压药(培哚普利8毫克,雷米普利10毫克,氨氯地平10毫克,氯沙坦100毫克,厄贝沙坦300毫克,坎地沙坦16毫克,坎地沙坦32毫克)与低起始剂量或安慰剂随机对照试验的比较。符合条件的研究包括12项比较全剂量与低剂量的随机对照试验,19项比较全起始剂量与安慰剂的随机对照试验。主要结局是与对照组相比血压降低的差异(报告或计算)。与低剂量相比,使用全剂量可以更好地降低血压(总体而言,降低3.9/2.2 mmHg达到血压),而不会增加不良反应。与安慰剂相比,全剂量治疗开始时取得的变化支持了这一观点(所有研究的平均值:11.4 [4.4]/6.5 [2.9]mmHg)。综述表明,开始全剂量抗高血压药物治疗原发性高血压可能是有益和安全的。现有数据有限,需要进一步的随机对照试验对特定患者群体进行评估,以评估安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书