Digital Transformation as a Moderator of Institutional Quality, Economic Development, and Social Factors in Renewable Energy Adoption: Evidence From Major Economies (1999–2023)

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Saqib Munir
{"title":"Digital Transformation as a Moderator of Institutional Quality, Economic Development, and Social Factors in Renewable Energy Adoption: Evidence From Major Economies (1999–2023)","authors":"Saqib Munir","doi":"10.1002/pa.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A limited understanding of the role of digital transformation as a moderator in the interaction of institutional quality, economic development, and renewable energy adoption in major economies has significantly held back the progress of sustainable energy transitions. This research focuses on the direct and moderated effects of institutional quality, economic development, urbanization, energy imports dependency, and environmental policy stringency on renewable energy adoption, theoretically grounded in the extension of institutional theory and the resource-based view. The study utilizes Pooled Mean Group Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) and Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) techniques on a balanced panel of 15 major economies (1999–2023), with data drawn from the World Development Indicators and Worldwide Governance Indicators. The results reveal that institutional quality is a major factor in the increase of renewable energy adoption (<i>β</i> = 12.678, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and the relationship between them is moderated positively by digital transformation (<i>β</i> = 0.150, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In addition, economic development (<i>β</i> = 2.434, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and urbanization (<i>β</i> = 1.473, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) are also responsible for the increase in adoption; however, the short-run urban effects are negative. Moreover, energy imports dependency (<i>β</i> = 0.077, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and environmental policy stringency (<i>β</i> = 0.617, <i>p</i> = 0.006) are the factors that lead to a further advancement of the transitions, while digital tools are the enablers of these effects. The results depict that digital infrastructure enables the effectiveness of governance and economic capacity. Such findings can be applied to theoretical frameworks that explain the role of digital transformation as a strategic enabler and enable purposeful policy focus. The scope of generalizability is hindered by data limitations including the heterogeneity of the region. Future research could contemplate analyzing the subnational processes or AI possibilities in energy systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A limited understanding of the role of digital transformation as a moderator in the interaction of institutional quality, economic development, and renewable energy adoption in major economies has significantly held back the progress of sustainable energy transitions. This research focuses on the direct and moderated effects of institutional quality, economic development, urbanization, energy imports dependency, and environmental policy stringency on renewable energy adoption, theoretically grounded in the extension of institutional theory and the resource-based view. The study utilizes Pooled Mean Group Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) and Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) techniques on a balanced panel of 15 major economies (1999–2023), with data drawn from the World Development Indicators and Worldwide Governance Indicators. The results reveal that institutional quality is a major factor in the increase of renewable energy adoption (β = 12.678, p < 0.001), and the relationship between them is moderated positively by digital transformation (β = 0.150, p < 0.001). In addition, economic development (β = 2.434, p = 0.005) and urbanization (β = 1.473, p < 0.001) are also responsible for the increase in adoption; however, the short-run urban effects are negative. Moreover, energy imports dependency (β = 0.077, p < 0.001) and environmental policy stringency (β = 0.617, p = 0.006) are the factors that lead to a further advancement of the transitions, while digital tools are the enablers of these effects. The results depict that digital infrastructure enables the effectiveness of governance and economic capacity. Such findings can be applied to theoretical frameworks that explain the role of digital transformation as a strategic enabler and enable purposeful policy focus. The scope of generalizability is hindered by data limitations including the heterogeneity of the region. Future research could contemplate analyzing the subnational processes or AI possibilities in energy systems.

数字化转型对可再生能源采用的制度质量、经济发展和社会因素的调节作用:来自主要经济体的证据(1999-2023)
在主要经济体中,数字化转型在制度质量、经济发展和可再生能源采用之间的相互作用中起着调节作用,但对其作用的理解有限,这严重阻碍了可持续能源转型的进展。本文以制度质量、经济发展、城市化、能源进口依赖和环境政策严格程度对可再生能源采用的直接和调节效应为理论基础,从制度理论的延伸和资源基础观点出发。本研究采用混合平均群自回归分布滞后(PMG-ARDL)和完全修正普通最小二乘(FMOLS)技术,对15个主要经济体(1999-2023)的均衡面板进行了分析,数据来自《世界发展指标》和《全球治理指标》。结果表明,制度质量是可再生能源采用增加的主要因素(β = 12.678, p < 0.001),两者之间的关系受到数字化转型的正向调节(β = 0.150, p < 0.001)。此外,经济发展(β = 2.434, p = 0.005)和城市化(β = 1.473, p < 0.001)也对采用率的增加负责;然而,对城市的短期影响是负面的。此外,能源进口依赖(β = 0.077, p < 0.001)和环境政策严格(β = 0.617, p = 0.006)是导致转型进一步推进的因素,而数字工具是这些影响的推手。结果表明,数字基础设施能够提高治理效率和经济能力。这些发现可以应用于理论框架,解释数字转型作为战略推动者的作用,并实现有目的的政策重点。概括性的范围受到数据限制的阻碍,包括该地区的异质性。未来的研究可以考虑分析次国家进程或能源系统中人工智能的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书