Skill recognition as social investment. Employer perceptions of the value of alternative credentials in the childcare sector

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Annatina Aerne, Giuliano Bonoli
{"title":"Skill recognition as social investment. Employer perceptions of the value of alternative credentials in the childcare sector","authors":"Annatina Aerne,&nbsp;Giuliano Bonoli","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In advanced knowledge economies, access to quality employment depends crucially on skills. The social investment perspective has recognised this and promotes skill development as a means of dealing with social problems. However, possessing skills may not be enough. Individuals who have been educated abroad or have acquired skills through experience face the risk of labour market marginalisation. To address this issue, most European countries have developed alternative skill certification systems (recognition of experience or foreign qualifications). Using queuing and signalling theory, we study employers' perception of alternative skill certification. Empirically, we focus on childcare in Switzerland. First, we use a vignette experiment to examine how employers evaluate alternative credentials. Second, based on qualitative interviews, we explore what drives employers' assessment. We find that while possessing alternative credentials significantly increases such candidates' hiring prospects, they are not considered equal to those holding standard degrees because employers do not believe they have acquired certain specific skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In advanced knowledge economies, access to quality employment depends crucially on skills. The social investment perspective has recognised this and promotes skill development as a means of dealing with social problems. However, possessing skills may not be enough. Individuals who have been educated abroad or have acquired skills through experience face the risk of labour market marginalisation. To address this issue, most European countries have developed alternative skill certification systems (recognition of experience or foreign qualifications). Using queuing and signalling theory, we study employers' perception of alternative skill certification. Empirically, we focus on childcare in Switzerland. First, we use a vignette experiment to examine how employers evaluate alternative credentials. Second, based on qualitative interviews, we explore what drives employers' assessment. We find that while possessing alternative credentials significantly increases such candidates' hiring prospects, they are not considered equal to those holding standard degrees because employers do not believe they have acquired certain specific skills.

Abstract Image

技能认可作为社会投资。雇主对托儿行业替代证书价值的看法
在先进的知识经济中,获得高质量就业至关重要地取决于技能。社会投资的观点已经认识到这一点,并推动技能发展作为处理社会问题的一种手段。然而,拥有技能可能还不够。在国外接受教育或通过经验获得技能的个人面临劳动力市场边缘化的风险。为了解决这个问题,大多数欧洲国家已经开发了替代技能认证系统(承认经验或外国资格)。利用排队和信号理论,我们研究了雇主对替代技能认证的看法。根据经验,我们关注瑞士的儿童保育。首先,我们使用一个小插曲实验来检查雇主如何评估替代证书。其次,基于定性访谈,我们探讨了驱动雇主评估的因素。我们发现,虽然拥有其他学历显著增加了这些候选人的就业前景,但他们并不被认为与持有标准学位的人平等,因为雇主不相信他们已经获得了某些特定的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书