Rapid integration of speaker accent during morphosyntactic processing

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Brain and Language Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105673
Rebecca Holt , Carmen Kung , Elaine Schmidt , Katherine Demuth
{"title":"Rapid integration of speaker accent during morphosyntactic processing","authors":"Rebecca Holt ,&nbsp;Carmen Kung ,&nbsp;Elaine Schmidt ,&nbsp;Katherine Demuth","doi":"10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Listeners take multiple sources of information into account when processing spoken language. This includes the speaker’s accent, which affects the on-line processing of many aspects of language, including morphosyntax. This study investigated listeners’ neural responses to subject-verb agreement errors in native vs. Mandarin-accented English. The error types differed in typicality: Errors of omission, but not errors of commission, are frequently produced by Mandarin-accented English speakers. Different error types elicited different neural responses in native vs. foreign-accented speech. Errors of <em>omission</em> elicited a P600 in native speech and no response in foreign-accented speech, while errors of <em>commission</em> elicited an N400 in native speech and a sustained negativity, beginning before the overt violation, in foreign-accented speech. This illustrates the influence of speaker accent on morphosyntactic processing and suggests that, while listeners are sensitive to error typicality, factors such as the perceptual salience of the violation may also affect neural responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55330,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Language","volume":"273 ","pages":"Article 105673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X25001427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Listeners take multiple sources of information into account when processing spoken language. This includes the speaker’s accent, which affects the on-line processing of many aspects of language, including morphosyntax. This study investigated listeners’ neural responses to subject-verb agreement errors in native vs. Mandarin-accented English. The error types differed in typicality: Errors of omission, but not errors of commission, are frequently produced by Mandarin-accented English speakers. Different error types elicited different neural responses in native vs. foreign-accented speech. Errors of omission elicited a P600 in native speech and no response in foreign-accented speech, while errors of commission elicited an N400 in native speech and a sustained negativity, beginning before the overt violation, in foreign-accented speech. This illustrates the influence of speaker accent on morphosyntactic processing and suggests that, while listeners are sensitive to error typicality, factors such as the perceptual salience of the violation may also affect neural responses.
形态句法加工过程中说话人口音的快速整合
听者在处理口语时考虑到多种信息来源。这包括说话者的口音,它会影响语言的许多方面的在线加工,包括词法。本研究调查了听者在母语英语和普通话口音英语中对主动一致错误的神经反应。错误类型在典型性上有所不同:以普通话为口音的英语使用者经常犯省略错误,而不是委托错误。不同的错误类型在母语和外语口音中引起不同的神经反应。在本族语中,省略的错误引起了P600,在外国口音中没有反应,而在外国口音中,委托的错误引起了本族语中的N400,并在公开违反之前开始持续的否定。这说明了说话者重音对形态句法加工的影响,并表明,虽然听者对错误典型性很敏感,但违反的感知显著性等因素也可能影响神经反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain and Language
Brain and Language 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
20.5 weeks
期刊介绍: An interdisciplinary journal, Brain and Language publishes articles that elucidate the complex relationships among language, brain, and behavior. The journal covers the large variety of modern techniques in cognitive neuroscience, including functional and structural brain imaging, electrophysiology, cellular and molecular neurobiology, genetics, lesion-based approaches, and computational modeling. All articles must relate to human language and be relevant to the understanding of its neurobiological and neurocognitive bases. Published articles in the journal are expected to have significant theoretical novelty and/or practical implications, and use perspectives and methods from psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience along with brain data and brain measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书