12 Years of ablative fractional CO2 laser Practice: Logistics, lessons and evolving model of care

Q3 Medicine
Natalia Ziolkowski , Fiona M. Wood , Suzanne Rea , Inge Spronk , Dale W. Edgar , Helen Douglas
{"title":"12 Years of ablative fractional CO2 laser Practice: Logistics, lessons and evolving model of care","authors":"Natalia Ziolkowski ,&nbsp;Fiona M. Wood ,&nbsp;Suzanne Rea ,&nbsp;Inge Spronk ,&nbsp;Dale W. Edgar ,&nbsp;Helen Douglas","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2025.100435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub> lasers (AFCO<sub>2</sub>L) have been shown to improve burn hypertrophic scars significantly. In this paper we describe the journey of setting up the laser service for burns patients, considerations in patient selection, treatment algorithms, and lessons learned.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study is a retrospective cohort study including all patients who received AFCO<sub>2</sub>L at the Western Australian (WA) Statewide Adult Burn Unit since the start of the program in 2013–2024. Descriptive statistics present the number, timing and settings of AFCO<sub>2</sub>L events, as well as patient, injury, and treatment characteristics. Further, the profile of patients who underwent laser treatment was compared to those who did not, during the study period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Since the introduction of the AFCO2L, a total of 4005 laser sessions involving 837 burns patients has been completed in WA. The majority were performed as an outpatient (66 %), with the proportion and total numbers increasing with time to 2021. Compared to those not receiving laser for their scars, AFCO2L was more likely applied to younger (p &lt; 0.0001), female (p &lt; 0.0001) patients with higher %TBSA burns (p &lt; 0.0001) involving multiple anatomic areas (p = 0.001), more often requiring surgery (p &lt; 0.0001) and longer times to heal (p &lt; 0.0001). In 2013, 100 % of all lasers were provided as an inpatient, under general anesthetic with an average age of scar &gt; 5000 days. By 2023/4, only 18 % required an inpatient stay and the average age of scar was 111 days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The SABU team evolved AFCO<sub>2</sub>L therapy into the model of care over time to achieve earlier, more equitable delivery of laser treatments to 80 % of patients as outpatients, supported by extensive multidisciplinary team involvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912225000434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ablative fractional CO2 lasers (AFCO2L) have been shown to improve burn hypertrophic scars significantly. In this paper we describe the journey of setting up the laser service for burns patients, considerations in patient selection, treatment algorithms, and lessons learned.

Methods

This study is a retrospective cohort study including all patients who received AFCO2L at the Western Australian (WA) Statewide Adult Burn Unit since the start of the program in 2013–2024. Descriptive statistics present the number, timing and settings of AFCO2L events, as well as patient, injury, and treatment characteristics. Further, the profile of patients who underwent laser treatment was compared to those who did not, during the study period.

Results

Since the introduction of the AFCO2L, a total of 4005 laser sessions involving 837 burns patients has been completed in WA. The majority were performed as an outpatient (66 %), with the proportion and total numbers increasing with time to 2021. Compared to those not receiving laser for their scars, AFCO2L was more likely applied to younger (p < 0.0001), female (p < 0.0001) patients with higher %TBSA burns (p < 0.0001) involving multiple anatomic areas (p = 0.001), more often requiring surgery (p < 0.0001) and longer times to heal (p < 0.0001). In 2013, 100 % of all lasers were provided as an inpatient, under general anesthetic with an average age of scar > 5000 days. By 2023/4, only 18 % required an inpatient stay and the average age of scar was 111 days.

Conclusions

The SABU team evolved AFCO2L therapy into the model of care over time to achieve earlier, more equitable delivery of laser treatments to 80 % of patients as outpatients, supported by extensive multidisciplinary team involvement.
12年烧蚀分数CO2激光实践:后勤,经验教训和不断发展的护理模式
烧蚀分数CO2激光(AFCO2L)已被证明可以显著改善烧伤增生性疤痕。在本文中,我们描述了为烧伤患者建立激光服务的历程,患者选择的考虑因素,治疗算法和经验教训。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,包括自2013-2024年该项目开始以来在西澳大利亚州(WA)全州成人烧伤科接受AFCO2L治疗的所有患者。描述性统计显示AFCO2L事件的数量、时间和设置,以及患者、损伤和治疗特征。此外,在研究期间,接受激光治疗的患者与未接受激光治疗的患者进行了比较。结果自引进AFCO2L以来,西澳共完成4005次激光治疗,涉及837例烧伤患者。大多数是作为门诊进行的(66%),比例和总数随着时间的推移而增加,直到2021年。与那些没有接受激光治疗疤痕的患者相比,AFCO2L更可能应用于年轻(p < 0.0001),女性(p < 0.0001)患者,TBSA烧伤比例较高(p < 0.0001),涉及多个解剖区域(p = 0.001),更经常需要手术(p < 0.0001),愈合时间更长(p < 0.0001)。2013年,100%的激光都是作为住院患者提供的,在全身麻醉下,平均疤痕年龄为5000天。到2023/4年,只有18%的人需要住院治疗,疤痕的平均年龄为111天。随着时间的推移,SABU团队将AFCO2L治疗发展成为一种护理模式,在广泛的多学科团队参与的支持下,为80%的门诊患者提供更早、更公平的激光治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书