Not so fast? A comparative study of pre-service teachers’ lesson design using corpora and generative artificial intelligence

IF 2.1
Applied Corpus Linguistics Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100168
Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska
{"title":"Not so fast? A comparative study of pre-service teachers’ lesson design using corpora and generative artificial intelligence","authors":"Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of corpora and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teacher education presents both opportunities and challenges. While corpus-based approaches have long been promoted for data-driven learning (DDL), their adoption remains limited due to complexity issues and time-demands. In contrast, GenAI tools offer immediate, user-friendly access to linguistic data, yet raise concerns about authenticity and reliability. This study compares pre-service teachers’ use of corpora and GenAI in pedagogically oriented language analysis, lesson planning, and materials development. Conducted within a graduate-level course, the study examines student teachers’ approaches to corpus-based and AI-based lesson design, focusing on their ability to retrieve and analyse linguistic data, plan lessons, create learning materials, and reflect on the effectiveness of these tools. Findings indicate the considerable potential of both corpora and GenAI for supporting data-informed, inductive approaches to language learning and teaching. Yet, the results also reveal that while pre-service teachers demonstrated operational proficiency in using both tools, they struggled to extract meaningful linguistic insights and integrate their findings into cohesive pedagogical frameworks. The study highlights the need for targeted training to develop teachers’ analytical and pedagogical skills in working with both types of resources. Ultimately, it argues that rather than replacing corpora, GenAI should complement data-driven learning, reinforcing the importance of linguistic accuracy and pedagogical soundness in technology-enhanced language teaching.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799125000504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of corpora and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teacher education presents both opportunities and challenges. While corpus-based approaches have long been promoted for data-driven learning (DDL), their adoption remains limited due to complexity issues and time-demands. In contrast, GenAI tools offer immediate, user-friendly access to linguistic data, yet raise concerns about authenticity and reliability. This study compares pre-service teachers’ use of corpora and GenAI in pedagogically oriented language analysis, lesson planning, and materials development. Conducted within a graduate-level course, the study examines student teachers’ approaches to corpus-based and AI-based lesson design, focusing on their ability to retrieve and analyse linguistic data, plan lessons, create learning materials, and reflect on the effectiveness of these tools. Findings indicate the considerable potential of both corpora and GenAI for supporting data-informed, inductive approaches to language learning and teaching. Yet, the results also reveal that while pre-service teachers demonstrated operational proficiency in using both tools, they struggled to extract meaningful linguistic insights and integrate their findings into cohesive pedagogical frameworks. The study highlights the need for targeted training to develop teachers’ analytical and pedagogical skills in working with both types of resources. Ultimately, it argues that rather than replacing corpora, GenAI should complement data-driven learning, reinforcing the importance of linguistic accuracy and pedagogical soundness in technology-enhanced language teaching.
没那么快?基于语料库和生成式人工智能的职前教师课程设计比较研究
语料库与生成式人工智能(GenAI)在语文教师教育中的融合,带来了机遇与挑战。虽然基于语料库的方法长期以来一直被推广用于数据驱动学习(DDL),但由于复杂性问题和时间要求,它们的采用仍然受到限制。相比之下,GenAI工具提供了对语言数据的即时、用户友好的访问,但引起了对真实性和可靠性的担忧。本研究比较职前教师在以教学为导向的语言分析、课程规划和材料开发中使用语料库和GenAI的情况。该研究在研究生水平的课程中进行,考察了学生教师基于语料库和基于人工智能的课程设计方法,重点关注他们检索和分析语言数据、计划课程、创建学习材料以及反思这些工具的有效性的能力。研究结果表明,语料库和GenAI在支持基于数据的、归纳的语言学习和教学方法方面具有相当大的潜力。然而,研究结果还显示,尽管职前教师在使用这两种工具方面表现出了熟练的操作能力,但他们很难提取有意义的语言见解,并将他们的发现整合到有凝聚力的教学框架中。该研究强调需要进行有针对性的培训,以培养教师在使用这两种资源方面的分析和教学技能。最后,它认为GenAI不应该取代语料库,而应该补充数据驱动的学习,在技术增强的语言教学中强调语言准确性和教学合理性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书