Assessing the influence of variables on vehicle speed determination through reverse projection analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Science & Justice Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101369
Walter E Bruehs , Dorothy Stout
{"title":"Assessing the influence of variables on vehicle speed determination through reverse projection analysis","authors":"Walter E Bruehs ,&nbsp;Dorothy Stout","doi":"10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reverse projection photogrammetry has long been established as a forensic tool for estimating height and, more recently, vehicle speed from video. Previous work has demonstrated its feasibility under controlled daytime conditions using digital video recorders (DVRs). This study extends that foundation by systematically evaluating how additional variables specifically headlight bloom as a marker, and frame rate variability in network video recorders (NVRs) and cloud-based consumer systems might affect the accuracy of speed determination. Vehicle speeds were independently documented using Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) and in-dash speedometer recordings, providing complementary ground truth: LIDAR offered precise point-in-time measures, while the speedometer delivered a continuous average across the test interval. Together, these methods established a baseline for comparison against photogrammetric calculations.</div><div>Structured experiments were conducted at a closed test track, with multiple DVR, NVR, and cloud devices recording daytime and nighttime runs at varying speeds. Speed was estimated by measuring vehicle position (or headlight bloom at night) via reverse projection photogrammetry and calculating elapsed time using frame counts or, when necessary, frame analysis tools. Results showed that higher and more stable frame rates reduced uncertainty, while consumer cloud systems and some NVRs introduced dropped or inconsistent frames, producing errors outside the expected margin. Conversely, headlight bloom proved to be a reliable nighttime surrogate for vehicle position.</div><div>These findings demonstrate that reverse projection photogrammetry provides a reliable means of estimating vehicle speed when recorder timing is properly accounted for and understood. By quantifying sources of uncertainty across diverse recording systems and lighting conditions, this research strengthens the evidentiary basis for using video-derived speed estimates in forensic analysis and supports their defensible application in casework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49565,"journal":{"name":"Science & Justice","volume":"66 1","pages":"Article 101369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355030625001534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reverse projection photogrammetry has long been established as a forensic tool for estimating height and, more recently, vehicle speed from video. Previous work has demonstrated its feasibility under controlled daytime conditions using digital video recorders (DVRs). This study extends that foundation by systematically evaluating how additional variables specifically headlight bloom as a marker, and frame rate variability in network video recorders (NVRs) and cloud-based consumer systems might affect the accuracy of speed determination. Vehicle speeds were independently documented using Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) and in-dash speedometer recordings, providing complementary ground truth: LIDAR offered precise point-in-time measures, while the speedometer delivered a continuous average across the test interval. Together, these methods established a baseline for comparison against photogrammetric calculations.
Structured experiments were conducted at a closed test track, with multiple DVR, NVR, and cloud devices recording daytime and nighttime runs at varying speeds. Speed was estimated by measuring vehicle position (or headlight bloom at night) via reverse projection photogrammetry and calculating elapsed time using frame counts or, when necessary, frame analysis tools. Results showed that higher and more stable frame rates reduced uncertainty, while consumer cloud systems and some NVRs introduced dropped or inconsistent frames, producing errors outside the expected margin. Conversely, headlight bloom proved to be a reliable nighttime surrogate for vehicle position.
These findings demonstrate that reverse projection photogrammetry provides a reliable means of estimating vehicle speed when recorder timing is properly accounted for and understood. By quantifying sources of uncertainty across diverse recording systems and lighting conditions, this research strengthens the evidentiary basis for using video-derived speed estimates in forensic analysis and supports their defensible application in casework.
通过逆向投影分析评估变量对车速确定的影响
反向投影摄影测量法长期以来一直是一种法医工具,用于估计高度,最近,从视频中估计车辆速度。之前的工作已经证明了它在白天受控条件下使用数字视频录像机(dvr)的可行性。本研究通过系统地评估附加变量(特别是作为标记的前灯绽放)以及网络视频录像机(nvr)和基于云的消费者系统中的帧速率可变性如何影响速度确定的准确性来扩展该基础。使用光探测和测距(LIDAR)和仪表盘内的速度计记录独立记录车辆速度,提供互补的地面事实:LIDAR提供精确的时间点测量,而速度计提供整个测试间隔内的连续平均值。总之,这些方法建立了与摄影测量计算比较的基线。结构化实验在封闭的测试轨道上进行,使用多个DVR、NVR和云设备记录白天和夜间不同速度的运行情况。通过反向投影摄影测量测量车辆位置(或夜间前灯绽放)来估计速度,并使用帧计数或必要时使用帧分析工具计算经过的时间。结果表明,更高和更稳定的帧率减少了不确定性,而消费者云系统和一些nvr引入了丢失或不一致的帧,产生超出预期范围的错误。相反,前灯绽放被证明是一个可靠的夜间替代车辆的位置。这些发现表明,反向投影摄影测量提供了一个可靠的手段,估计车辆的速度,当记录器定时适当地考虑和理解。通过量化不同记录系统和照明条件下的不确定性来源,本研究加强了在法医分析中使用视频导出的速度估计的证据基础,并支持其在案件工作中的辩护应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Justice
Science & Justice 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
98
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Science & Justice provides a forum to promote communication and publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that spark debates within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. The journal provides a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. Science & Justice is published six times a year, and will be of interest primarily to practising forensic scientists and their colleagues in related fields. It is chiefly concerned with the publication of formal scientific papers, in keeping with its international learned status, but will not accept any article describing experimentation on animals which does not meet strict ethical standards. Promote communication and informed debate within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. To promote the publication of learned and original research findings from all areas of the forensic sciences and by so doing to advance the profession. To promote the publication of case based material by way of case reviews. To promote the publication of conference proceedings which are of interest to the forensic science community. To provide a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. To appeal to all those with an interest in the forensic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书