Impact of interprofessional education in underserved settings on pharmacy student empathy

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Erin Anderson, Joshua Wollen, Bernadette Asias-Dinh, Jodie Gee, David Wallace, Catherine Hatfield, Matthew A. Wanat, Natalie Rosario
{"title":"Impact of interprofessional education in underserved settings on pharmacy student empathy","authors":"Erin Anderson,&nbsp;Joshua Wollen,&nbsp;Bernadette Asias-Dinh,&nbsp;Jodie Gee,&nbsp;David Wallace,&nbsp;Catherine Hatfield,&nbsp;Matthew A. Wanat,&nbsp;Natalie Rosario","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess how the P2 interprofessional education (IPE) in underserved populations impact student empathy scores compared to an alternative empathy-based video for P1 students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The validated Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale Revised (KCES-R) was administered to P1 students (<em>n</em> = 47) without IPE experience and P2 students (<em>n</em> = 21) who completed IPE during the 2023–2024 academic year. P1 student empathy was assessed before and after watching an empathy-based video as the control. P2 students completed KCES-R before and after their IPE. Both groups also took the KCES-R 30 days after their intervention of IPE or control video. The primary outcome of the difference in mean change of KCES-R empathy scores between groups was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. Secondary outcomes of mean change in KCES-R score by IPE site, change among P1s and P2s separately, and change among both groups combined were analyzed by a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline empathy scores were high in both P1s and P2s. Overall, empathy scores increased after IPE and the empathy-based video. There was no meaningful differences in change in KCES-R empathy scores between the P1 and P2 students when comparing interventions, or when comparing IPE sites.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both P1 and P2 students at this institution had high baseline empathy scores. <strong>I</strong>n students with high baseline empathy scores, a 4–6.5-h IPE experience may not be long enough to impact a change in student's empathy scores and sustain that change compared to our control group who watched an empathy-based video.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"18 3","pages":"Article 102539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725002606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess how the P2 interprofessional education (IPE) in underserved populations impact student empathy scores compared to an alternative empathy-based video for P1 students.

Methods

The validated Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale Revised (KCES-R) was administered to P1 students (n = 47) without IPE experience and P2 students (n = 21) who completed IPE during the 2023–2024 academic year. P1 student empathy was assessed before and after watching an empathy-based video as the control. P2 students completed KCES-R before and after their IPE. Both groups also took the KCES-R 30 days after their intervention of IPE or control video. The primary outcome of the difference in mean change of KCES-R empathy scores between groups was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary outcomes of mean change in KCES-R score by IPE site, change among P1s and P2s separately, and change among both groups combined were analyzed by a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.

Results

Baseline empathy scores were high in both P1s and P2s. Overall, empathy scores increased after IPE and the empathy-based video. There was no meaningful differences in change in KCES-R empathy scores between the P1 and P2 students when comparing interventions, or when comparing IPE sites.

Conclusion

Both P1 and P2 students at this institution had high baseline empathy scores. In students with high baseline empathy scores, a 4–6.5-h IPE experience may not be long enough to impact a change in student's empathy scores and sustain that change compared to our control group who watched an empathy-based video.
服务不足环境下跨专业教育对药学学生共情的影响
目的评估P2跨专业教育(IPE)对服务不足人群学生共情得分的影响,并与P1学生的另一种基于共情的视频进行比较。方法采用经验证的Kiersma-Chen共情量表(KCES-R)对2023-2024学年未完成IPE课程的P1 (n = 47)和完成IPE课程的P2 (n = 21)进行问卷调查。P1学生在观看以共情为基础的视频之前和之后作为对照进行共情评估。P2学生在IPE之前和之后完成了KCES-R课程。两组均在IPE或对照视频干预后30天服用KCES-R。KCES-R共情得分均数变化差异的主要结局采用Mann-Whitney U检验。次要结局采用Wilcoxon sign Rank检验,分析IPE站点KCES-R评分的平均变化、p15和p15单独变化、两组合并变化。结果p15和p25的基线共情得分均较高。总体而言,在IPE和基于同理心的视频之后,同理心得分有所提高。在比较干预措施或比较IPE地点时,P1和P2学生的KCES-R共情得分的变化没有显著差异。结论该机构P1和P2学生均具有较高的基线共情得分。在基线共情得分较高的学生中,与观看基于共情的视频的对照组相比,4 - 6.5小时的IPE体验可能不足以影响学生共情得分的变化并维持这种变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书