High interest but low adoption: Navigating organizations’ journey towards generative artificial intelligence implementation

IF 27 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Xiaoqing Wang , Wanle Zhong , Keman Huang , Bin Liang
{"title":"High interest but low adoption: Navigating organizations’ journey towards generative artificial intelligence implementation","authors":"Xiaoqing Wang ,&nbsp;Wanle Zhong ,&nbsp;Keman Huang ,&nbsp;Bin Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.103009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (aka, LLMs) provides high potential to transform organizational operations, yet a pronounced <em>high interest but low adoption</em> gap persists. Hence, moving beyond individual-level studies to examine organization-wide implementation, we draw on Rogers’ innovation decision process and Engeström’s activity theory, and conduct in-depth interviews with 27 front-line experts, including LLM providers, adopters, and advisors. Our analysis uncovers ten key contradictions and corresponding practice-driven solutions that emerge across five implementation stages (agenda-setting, matching, redefining and restructuring, clarifying, and routinizing). These insights illuminate not only the multi-stage, socio-technical complexity of LLM deployment but also shifting priorities among activity subsystems and the collaborative mechanisms essential for success. Building on these findings, we offer actionable recommendations for practitioners: a tiered rollout strategy; the technical capability building including decision-support and trial platforms, agile modular architectures and multi-layer update pipelines; as well as an accountable governance framework that integrates internal controls with external accountability. By synthesizing theoretical and practical perspectives, our study intends to guide researchers and business leaders navigate the challenges of organizational LLM implementation and realize their transformative potential at scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103009"},"PeriodicalIF":27.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401225001410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (aka, LLMs) provides high potential to transform organizational operations, yet a pronounced high interest but low adoption gap persists. Hence, moving beyond individual-level studies to examine organization-wide implementation, we draw on Rogers’ innovation decision process and Engeström’s activity theory, and conduct in-depth interviews with 27 front-line experts, including LLM providers, adopters, and advisors. Our analysis uncovers ten key contradictions and corresponding practice-driven solutions that emerge across five implementation stages (agenda-setting, matching, redefining and restructuring, clarifying, and routinizing). These insights illuminate not only the multi-stage, socio-technical complexity of LLM deployment but also shifting priorities among activity subsystems and the collaborative mechanisms essential for success. Building on these findings, we offer actionable recommendations for practitioners: a tiered rollout strategy; the technical capability building including decision-support and trial platforms, agile modular architectures and multi-layer update pipelines; as well as an accountable governance framework that integrates internal controls with external accountability. By synthesizing theoretical and practical perspectives, our study intends to guide researchers and business leaders navigate the challenges of organizational LLM implementation and realize their transformative potential at scale.
高兴趣但低采用:引导组织走向生成式人工智能实现的旅程
生成式人工智能(又名法学硕士)的快速发展为改变组织运营提供了巨大的潜力,然而,人们对它的兴趣很高,但采用程度却很低。因此,我们超越了个人层面的研究,考察了组织范围内的实施情况,借鉴了罗杰斯的创新决策过程和Engeström的活动理论,并对27位一线专家进行了深入采访,包括法学硕士提供者、采用者和顾问。我们的分析揭示了在五个实施阶段(议程设置、匹配、重新定义和重组、澄清和常规化)中出现的十个关键矛盾和相应的实践驱动解决方案。这些见解不仅说明了LLM部署的多阶段、社会技术复杂性,而且还说明了活动子系统之间的优先级转移和成功所必需的协作机制。基于这些发现,我们为从业者提供了可操作的建议:分层推出策略;技术能力建设包括决策支持和试验平台、敏捷模块化架构和多层更新管道;以及一个负责任的治理框架,将内部控制与外部问责制相结合。通过综合理论和实践观点,我们的研究旨在指导研究人员和商业领袖应对组织法学硕士实施的挑战,并在规模上实现其变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书