Verb-centric or balanced?: An NLP-based assessment of word class contributions to L2 writing proficiency

IF 7.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100997
Hyunwoo Kim , Haerim Hwang
{"title":"Verb-centric or balanced?: An NLP-based assessment of word class contributions to L2 writing proficiency","authors":"Hyunwoo Kim ,&nbsp;Haerim Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the significant role of verbs in second language (L2) development, few studies have explicitly tested the comparative role of verbs in predicting L2 writing proficiency compared to other lexical categories, such as adjectives, adverbs, and nouns. Motivated by the theoretical and linguistic prominence of verbs, this study examines whether verbs serve as stronger predictors of L2 writing proficiency than other word classes. Our category-based analysis of lexical diversity and sophistication features in argumentative essays showed that verbs play a distinct and prominent role in L2 writing, outperforming other lexical categories as predictors of L2 proficiency. Specifically, higher-proficiency argumentative essays were found to exhibit a greater variety of verbs that are infrequent, academically oriented, less familiar, and acquired later in language development. At theoretical level, our findings align with the perspectives emphasizing the crucial role of verbs in language development. Pedagogically, our findings highlight the need for category-based vocabulary instruction in L2 writing classes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 100997"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000844","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the significant role of verbs in second language (L2) development, few studies have explicitly tested the comparative role of verbs in predicting L2 writing proficiency compared to other lexical categories, such as adjectives, adverbs, and nouns. Motivated by the theoretical and linguistic prominence of verbs, this study examines whether verbs serve as stronger predictors of L2 writing proficiency than other word classes. Our category-based analysis of lexical diversity and sophistication features in argumentative essays showed that verbs play a distinct and prominent role in L2 writing, outperforming other lexical categories as predictors of L2 proficiency. Specifically, higher-proficiency argumentative essays were found to exhibit a greater variety of verbs that are infrequent, academically oriented, less familiar, and acquired later in language development. At theoretical level, our findings align with the perspectives emphasizing the crucial role of verbs in language development. Pedagogically, our findings highlight the need for category-based vocabulary instruction in L2 writing classes.
动词中心还是平衡?基于nlp的词类对第二语言写作能力贡献的评估
尽管动词在第二语言(L2)发展中发挥着重要作用,但很少有研究明确测试动词与其他词汇类别(如形容词、副词和名词)相比,在预测第二语言写作水平方面的比较作用。由于动词在理论和语言学上的突出地位,本研究考察了动词是否比其他词类更能预测二语写作水平。我们对议论文中词汇多样性和复杂性特征的分类分析表明,动词在二语写作中发挥着独特而突出的作用,作为二语熟练程度的预测指标,动词的表现优于其他词汇类别。具体来说,研究发现,熟练程度越高的议论文中出现的动词种类越多,这些动词不常见,以学术为导向,不太熟悉,并且是在语言发展的后期习得的。在理论层面上,我们的发现与强调动词在语言发展中的关键作用的观点一致。在教学方面,我们的研究结果强调了在第二语言写作课中进行基于类别的词汇教学的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书