Animal models of Huntington's disease. Pros and cons

IF 3.8 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Polina Stepanova , Merja H. Voutilainen , Ove Eriksson , Dan Lindholm
{"title":"Animal models of Huntington's disease. Pros and cons","authors":"Polina Stepanova ,&nbsp;Merja H. Voutilainen ,&nbsp;Ove Eriksson ,&nbsp;Dan Lindholm","doi":"10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Modelling of human neurological diseases uses a plethora of ever-more sophisticated methods and approaches. For Huntington's disease (HD), which affects specific neuronal types and circuits in the brain, this has meant the use of both neurotoxic compounds and various animal models of different complexity, ranging from rodents to non-primate ones. Genetic models are classified based on the use of specific constructs including gene including gene fragments, full-length, knock-out and knock-in models. In this review, we will discuss the available animal models for HD, highlighting their pros and cons in studying the neuropathology, behavioural alterations, and biological mechanisms that prevail in HD and during the disease progression. We also highlight present knowledge gaps and difficulties to fully recapitulate the human disease. At the end we will further elaborate on current outstanding questions in HD research that warrant further studies using both animal models and patient data. This may help to guide future research and increase the translational relevance of the models to solve key questions and pave the way for better treatment options and design of drugs to alleviate the course of HD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72454,"journal":{"name":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354625002078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modelling of human neurological diseases uses a plethora of ever-more sophisticated methods and approaches. For Huntington's disease (HD), which affects specific neuronal types and circuits in the brain, this has meant the use of both neurotoxic compounds and various animal models of different complexity, ranging from rodents to non-primate ones. Genetic models are classified based on the use of specific constructs including gene including gene fragments, full-length, knock-out and knock-in models. In this review, we will discuss the available animal models for HD, highlighting their pros and cons in studying the neuropathology, behavioural alterations, and biological mechanisms that prevail in HD and during the disease progression. We also highlight present knowledge gaps and difficulties to fully recapitulate the human disease. At the end we will further elaborate on current outstanding questions in HD research that warrant further studies using both animal models and patient data. This may help to guide future research and increase the translational relevance of the models to solve key questions and pave the way for better treatment options and design of drugs to alleviate the course of HD.

Abstract Image

亨廷顿舞蹈病的动物模型。利与弊
人类神经系统疾病的建模使用了大量越来越复杂的方法和途径。亨廷顿舞蹈症(HD)影响大脑中特定的神经元类型和回路,这意味着要使用神经毒性化合物和各种不同复杂程度的动物模型,从啮齿动物到非灵长类动物。遗传模型的分类基于使用特定的结构,包括基因,包括基因片段,全长,敲除和敲入模型。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论现有的HD动物模型,强调它们在研究HD和疾病进展过程中普遍存在的神经病理学、行为改变和生物学机制方面的优缺点。我们还强调目前在全面概括人类疾病方面的知识差距和困难。最后,我们将进一步阐述当前HD研究中悬而未决的问题,这些问题需要进一步使用动物模型和患者数据进行研究。这可能有助于指导未来的研究,增加模型的翻译相关性,以解决关键问题,并为更好的治疗方案和药物设计铺平道路,以缓解HD的病程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
97 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书