Building organizational and project readiness for AI: A dialectical approach

IF 7.6 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Daniel Erian Armanios , Christopher L. Tucci
{"title":"Building organizational and project readiness for AI: A dialectical approach","authors":"Daniel Erian Armanios ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Tucci","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To date, most organizational and project management studies have focused on how to deploy artificial intelligence (AI) tools to improve outcomes. However, this wrongly assumes the preexisting project and organizational context is already prepared to incorporate such AI tooling productively. To address this issue, this essay proposes a provocation that we call CIPHER, a first-of-a-kind framework to increase organizational readiness for deploying AI in project work. CIPHER identifies six key tensions that occur with the use of AI: <u>C</u>ognitive, <u>I</u>nformational, <u>P</u>rojection, <u>H</u>aptic, <u>E</u>xchange, and <u>R</u>esource. These tensions occur either when humans directly interface with algorithms or indirectly where humans interface with an algorithmically driven robotic, immersive reality, and/or multi-agent system. For each tension, we identify a key project lever to navigate these tensions: intergenerational teaming, problem scoping, delivery-validation scaffolding, task separability, multi-agent governance, and model parsimony &amp; transfer learning. Our aim is that through CIPHER, project leaders can harness the promise of AI while also more carefully managing its perils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 8","pages":"Article 102792"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786325001176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, most organizational and project management studies have focused on how to deploy artificial intelligence (AI) tools to improve outcomes. However, this wrongly assumes the preexisting project and organizational context is already prepared to incorporate such AI tooling productively. To address this issue, this essay proposes a provocation that we call CIPHER, a first-of-a-kind framework to increase organizational readiness for deploying AI in project work. CIPHER identifies six key tensions that occur with the use of AI: Cognitive, Informational, Projection, Haptic, Exchange, and Resource. These tensions occur either when humans directly interface with algorithms or indirectly where humans interface with an algorithmically driven robotic, immersive reality, and/or multi-agent system. For each tension, we identify a key project lever to navigate these tensions: intergenerational teaming, problem scoping, delivery-validation scaffolding, task separability, multi-agent governance, and model parsimony & transfer learning. Our aim is that through CIPHER, project leaders can harness the promise of AI while also more carefully managing its perils.
为人工智能构建组织和项目准备:辩证的方法
迄今为止,大多数组织和项目管理研究都集中在如何部署人工智能(AI)工具来改善结果上。然而,这错误地假设了先前存在的项目和组织环境已经准备好有效地合并这种人工智能工具。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一个我们称之为CIPHER的挑衅,这是一个首创的框架,可以提高组织在项目工作中部署人工智能的准备程度。CIPHER确定了人工智能使用中出现的六个关键紧张关系:认知、信息、投射、触觉、交流和资源。当人类直接与算法交互时,或者当人类与算法驱动的机器人、沉浸式现实和/或多代理系统交互时,这些紧张关系就会发生。对于每种紧张关系,我们确定了一个关键的项目杠杆来处理这些紧张关系:代际团队合作、问题范围界定、交付验证脚手架、任务可分离性、多代理治理、模型简约和迁移学习。我们的目标是,通过CIPHER,项目负责人可以利用人工智能的前景,同时更仔细地管理其风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书