Building-related symptoms in school environment: Predictability using machine learning approach

Indoor Environments Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100140
Azimil Gani Alam , Alena Bartonova , Britt Ann Kåstad Høiskar , Mirjam F. Fredriksen , Jivitesh Sharma , Hans Martin Mathisen , Zhirong Yang , Kai Gustavsen , Tore Fredriksen , Dinastry Pramadita Zakiudin , Guangyu Cao
{"title":"Building-related symptoms in school environment: Predictability using machine learning approach","authors":"Azimil Gani Alam ,&nbsp;Alena Bartonova ,&nbsp;Britt Ann Kåstad Høiskar ,&nbsp;Mirjam F. Fredriksen ,&nbsp;Jivitesh Sharma ,&nbsp;Hans Martin Mathisen ,&nbsp;Zhirong Yang ,&nbsp;Kai Gustavsen ,&nbsp;Tore Fredriksen ,&nbsp;Dinastry Pramadita Zakiudin ,&nbsp;Guangyu Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building-related symptoms (BRS) are commonly experienced by students in schools and are potentially affecting academic performance and health. Even though indoor environment quality (IEQ) measurements indicated fair conditions, students still perceived discomfort that led to symptoms, highlighting the necessity of collecting user-feedback about IEQ-complaints. This study aimed to predict and understand the prevalence of BRS (<em>headache, tiredness, cough, dry eyes-hands</em>) experienced by students in classrooms using machine-learning (ML) approach based on measurement data, building factors, and prevalence of IEQ-complaints. We collected measurement data (from indoor and outdoor climate), building factors, and user-feedback by students via online-platform across three sampled classrooms each campaign during three consecutive school semesters. Significant input variables for ML were pre-selected using statistical tests. ML models were evaluated based on accuracy metrics and SHAP analysis for input interpretation. Models using measurement data alone performed poorly (testing R² &lt;50 %) to predict prevalence of BRS, whereas adding building factors and prevalence of IEQ-complaints increased accuracy (R² up to 95 %) of prediction of BRS with lower RMSE. In addition, interpretation from SHAP analysis showed IEQ-complaints especially related with indoor air quality (e.g., <em>heavy air</em>, <em>dust &amp; dirt</em>, and <em>dry air</em>) as significant contributors for predicting prevalence of BRS. We conclude that the framework of combining objective measurements with occupant-reported complaints can be reliable, interpretable predictions of symptom prevalence. This study is limited by single-school setting, health confounders, and symptoms verification. Future research may contribute to exploring wider set of input variables, applicability, and variation of complaints preference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362025000694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building-related symptoms (BRS) are commonly experienced by students in schools and are potentially affecting academic performance and health. Even though indoor environment quality (IEQ) measurements indicated fair conditions, students still perceived discomfort that led to symptoms, highlighting the necessity of collecting user-feedback about IEQ-complaints. This study aimed to predict and understand the prevalence of BRS (headache, tiredness, cough, dry eyes-hands) experienced by students in classrooms using machine-learning (ML) approach based on measurement data, building factors, and prevalence of IEQ-complaints. We collected measurement data (from indoor and outdoor climate), building factors, and user-feedback by students via online-platform across three sampled classrooms each campaign during three consecutive school semesters. Significant input variables for ML were pre-selected using statistical tests. ML models were evaluated based on accuracy metrics and SHAP analysis for input interpretation. Models using measurement data alone performed poorly (testing R² <50 %) to predict prevalence of BRS, whereas adding building factors and prevalence of IEQ-complaints increased accuracy (R² up to 95 %) of prediction of BRS with lower RMSE. In addition, interpretation from SHAP analysis showed IEQ-complaints especially related with indoor air quality (e.g., heavy air, dust & dirt, and dry air) as significant contributors for predicting prevalence of BRS. We conclude that the framework of combining objective measurements with occupant-reported complaints can be reliable, interpretable predictions of symptom prevalence. This study is limited by single-school setting, health confounders, and symptoms verification. Future research may contribute to exploring wider set of input variables, applicability, and variation of complaints preference.
学校环境中与建筑相关的症状:使用机器学习方法的可预测性
与建筑有关的症状(BRS)是学校学生普遍经历的,并且可能影响学习成绩和健康。尽管室内环境质量(IEQ)测量表明条件良好,但学生仍然感到不适,导致症状,突出了收集用户对IEQ投诉的反馈的必要性。本研究旨在基于测量数据、建筑因素和ieq投诉的患病率,使用机器学习(ML)方法预测和了解学生在课堂上经历的BRS(头痛、疲倦、咳嗽、眼手干涩)的患病率。我们收集了测量数据(来自室内和室外气候)、建筑因素和学生通过在线平台在连续三个学期的三个抽样教室中进行的用户反馈。使用统计检验预先选择ML的重要输入变量。基于输入解释的准确性指标和SHAP分析对ML模型进行评估。仅使用测量数据的模型在预测BRS患病率方面表现不佳(测试R²<;50 %),而添加建筑因素和ieq投诉患病率提高了预测BRS的准确性(R²高达95 %),RMSE较低。此外,来自SHAP分析的解释表明,ieq投诉特别是与室内空气质量(例如,重空气,灰尘和污垢以及干燥空气)有关,是预测BRS患病率的重要因素。我们的结论是,结合客观测量与乘员报告的投诉的框架可以是可靠的,可解释的症状患病率的预测。本研究受到单一学校环境、健康混杂因素和症状验证的限制。未来的研究可能有助于探索更广泛的输入变量、适用性和投诉偏好的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书