Meina He , Yunqiang Wang , Yali Zhao , Li Wang , Ziliang Zhang , Yi Song , Pingping Zhang , Zimin Li
{"title":"Event- and annual-scale precipitation extremes enhance groundwater recharge at the ecological restoration catchment of hilly and gully region","authors":"Meina He , Yunqiang Wang , Yali Zhao , Li Wang , Ziliang Zhang , Yi Song , Pingping Zhang , Zimin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Precipitation extremes and ecological restoration projects significantly influenced hydrological processes by mitigating or aggravating groundwater depletion within the Earth's critical zone. However, scientific evidence remains limited due to the strong dependence of deep recharge on both unsaturated zone thickness and precipitation event magnitude. Here, we analyzed seven-year field datasets encompassing precipitation, soil water content (SWC), surface water (reservoir water), and groundwater from an ecological restoration catchment on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Precipitation extremes triggered deep hydraulic connectivity between the unsaturated and saturated zones mainly through preferential flow pathways, as evidenced by depleted of δ<sup>18</sup>O, increased of SWC profiles, and rising water table. Temporal-spatial patterns of SWC (0–4000 cm profile) revealed preferential flow pathways on a sunny slope with recharge efficiency regulated by precipitation patterns and topography. In the gully, water tables showed a positive correlation with precipitation amount, duration, and initial SWC. These hydrological drivers induced significant differences in water table changes among precipitation years. In contrast, the slope (0–500 cm profile) maintained persistent water deficits with limited recharge response, despite precipitation inputs (except for a 167.7-mm event). Furthermore, precipitation variability coupled with plant root uptake altered the vertical soil water gradient, with the 200–300 cm layer functioning as a hydraulic buffer. However, prolonged drought triggered an accelerated water table recession at 60.8 mm/year, while creating carry-over soil water deficits that extended beyond dry years, sustaining 15.4 mm/year depletion even in the following normal year. When considering the saturated zone contribution, total recharge rates demonstrated the positive hydrological feedback of ecological restoration projects to annual precipitation, accounting for 45 % of precipitation (327.8 mm/year) during a wet year. Therefore, it can be inferred that event- and annual-scale precipitation extremes enhance groundwater recharge at the ecological restoration catchment. These findings provide critical scientific support for maintaining groundwater sustainability in such systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 107868"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425003581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Precipitation extremes and ecological restoration projects significantly influenced hydrological processes by mitigating or aggravating groundwater depletion within the Earth's critical zone. However, scientific evidence remains limited due to the strong dependence of deep recharge on both unsaturated zone thickness and precipitation event magnitude. Here, we analyzed seven-year field datasets encompassing precipitation, soil water content (SWC), surface water (reservoir water), and groundwater from an ecological restoration catchment on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Precipitation extremes triggered deep hydraulic connectivity between the unsaturated and saturated zones mainly through preferential flow pathways, as evidenced by depleted of δ18O, increased of SWC profiles, and rising water table. Temporal-spatial patterns of SWC (0–4000 cm profile) revealed preferential flow pathways on a sunny slope with recharge efficiency regulated by precipitation patterns and topography. In the gully, water tables showed a positive correlation with precipitation amount, duration, and initial SWC. These hydrological drivers induced significant differences in water table changes among precipitation years. In contrast, the slope (0–500 cm profile) maintained persistent water deficits with limited recharge response, despite precipitation inputs (except for a 167.7-mm event). Furthermore, precipitation variability coupled with plant root uptake altered the vertical soil water gradient, with the 200–300 cm layer functioning as a hydraulic buffer. However, prolonged drought triggered an accelerated water table recession at 60.8 mm/year, while creating carry-over soil water deficits that extended beyond dry years, sustaining 15.4 mm/year depletion even in the following normal year. When considering the saturated zone contribution, total recharge rates demonstrated the positive hydrological feedback of ecological restoration projects to annual precipitation, accounting for 45 % of precipitation (327.8 mm/year) during a wet year. Therefore, it can be inferred that event- and annual-scale precipitation extremes enhance groundwater recharge at the ecological restoration catchment. These findings provide critical scientific support for maintaining groundwater sustainability in such systems.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.