Arpita Sharma , Rishi Prasad , Anh T. Nguyen , Gerrit Hoogenboom , Brenda V. Ortiz , Audrey V. Gamble , Michelle R. Worosz , Leah Duzy
{"title":"Modeling nitrogen dynamics across contrasting yield zones to close yield gaps in a commercial maize system","authors":"Arpita Sharma , Rishi Prasad , Anh T. Nguyen , Gerrit Hoogenboom , Brenda V. Ortiz , Audrey V. Gamble , Michelle R. Worosz , Leah Duzy","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in maize systems demands a mechanistic understanding of how nitrogen (N) dynamics interact with climate variability, irrigation regimes, and within-field spatial heterogeneity. Yet, N fate pathways such as leaching, volatilization, and denitrification remain difficult to quantify across diverse zones of productivity under real-farm conditions.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to simulate the fate and flow of applied nitrogen across management zones with contrasting yield stability and water-holding capacity, using a process-based model under long-term weather and irrigation scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize model was calibrated and evaluated using independent field datasets from two growing seasons across two management zones (MZs) delineated by yield stability. The calibrated model was assessed for LAI, soil moisture, yield, soil N, and N uptake. After model evaluation, simulations were conducted over 40 years (1984–2022) of weather data, categorized into drought, normal, and wet years using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), and under three irrigation scenarios: rainfed, 50 %, and 30 % management allowable depletions (MAD).</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Upon calibration, DSSAT CSM CERES Maize showed good agreement between observed and simulated values for crop growth, development, and soil water and N dynamics (NRMSE <15 %), supporting the use of the model for management zone-based N accounting. In 2022 high yield management zone (MZ1) exhibited higher N uptake (305 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) and greater N losses via leaching (16.1 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) and volatilization (33 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), while low yield management zone (MZ2) showed elevated residual nitrate at harvest (60 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) and higher denitrification (6.2 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), indicating lower NUE. The long-term simulations indicated that leaching peaked under wet years (up to 33.8 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), whereas drought years induced maximum volatilization (65.5 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). MZ2 required 45 % more irrigation to match MZ1 yields, reflecting soil-based water limitations. Moderate MAD irrigation regimes (50 %) reduced total N losses without yield penalties.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study demonstrates that integrating spatial field variability with long-term climate and irrigation scenarios is critical for diagnosing N inefficiencies and optimizing N use. Mechanistic modeling provides a scalable decision-support tool to design adaptive nutrients and water management strategies tailored to heterogeneous production systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104598"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25003385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in maize systems demands a mechanistic understanding of how nitrogen (N) dynamics interact with climate variability, irrigation regimes, and within-field spatial heterogeneity. Yet, N fate pathways such as leaching, volatilization, and denitrification remain difficult to quantify across diverse zones of productivity under real-farm conditions.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to simulate the fate and flow of applied nitrogen across management zones with contrasting yield stability and water-holding capacity, using a process-based model under long-term weather and irrigation scenarios.
METHODS
The DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize model was calibrated and evaluated using independent field datasets from two growing seasons across two management zones (MZs) delineated by yield stability. The calibrated model was assessed for LAI, soil moisture, yield, soil N, and N uptake. After model evaluation, simulations were conducted over 40 years (1984–2022) of weather data, categorized into drought, normal, and wet years using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), and under three irrigation scenarios: rainfed, 50 %, and 30 % management allowable depletions (MAD).
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Upon calibration, DSSAT CSM CERES Maize showed good agreement between observed and simulated values for crop growth, development, and soil water and N dynamics (NRMSE <15 %), supporting the use of the model for management zone-based N accounting. In 2022 high yield management zone (MZ1) exhibited higher N uptake (305 kg N ha−1) and greater N losses via leaching (16.1 kg N ha−1) and volatilization (33 kg N ha−1), while low yield management zone (MZ2) showed elevated residual nitrate at harvest (60 kg N ha−1) and higher denitrification (6.2 kg N ha−1), indicating lower NUE. The long-term simulations indicated that leaching peaked under wet years (up to 33.8 kg N ha−1), whereas drought years induced maximum volatilization (65.5 kg ha−1). MZ2 required 45 % more irrigation to match MZ1 yields, reflecting soil-based water limitations. Moderate MAD irrigation regimes (50 %) reduced total N losses without yield penalties.
SIGNIFICANCE
This study demonstrates that integrating spatial field variability with long-term climate and irrigation scenarios is critical for diagnosing N inefficiencies and optimizing N use. Mechanistic modeling provides a scalable decision-support tool to design adaptive nutrients and water management strategies tailored to heterogeneous production systems.
提高玉米系统氮素利用效率(NUE)需要对氮素动态如何与气候变率、灌溉制度和田内空间异质性相互作用有一个机制上的了解。然而,在实际农场条件下,氮的命运途径,如淋溶、挥发和反硝化,仍然难以在不同的生产力区域进行量化。本研究旨在利用基于过程的模型,在长期天气和灌溉情景下,模拟具有不同产量稳定性和持水能力的管理区域施用氮的命运和流动。方法利用DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize模型的独立田间数据集进行校准和评估,这些数据集来自两个生长季节,跨越两个由产量稳定性划定的管理区(MZs)。对校准后的模型进行了LAI、土壤水分、产量、土壤氮和氮吸收的评估。在模式评估之后,利用标准化降水指数(SPI)对40年(1984-2022)的天气数据进行了模拟,将其分为干旱、正常和湿润年,并在三种灌溉方案下进行了模拟:雨养、50%和30%管理允许耗竭(MAD)。结果与结论经校正,DSSAT CSM CERES玉米在作物生长、发育、土壤水分和氮动态方面的观测值与模拟值吻合良好(NRMSE & 15%),支持使用该模型进行基于管理区的氮核算。2022年,高产区(MZ1)表现出较高的氮素吸收量(305 kg N ha−1)、较大的淋失(16.1 kg N ha−1)和挥发(33 kg N ha−1),而低产区(MZ2)表现出较高的收获期残留硝态氮(60 kg N ha−1)和较高的反硝化作用(6.2 kg N ha−1),表明氮素利用效率较低。长期模拟表明,淋溶在湿润年达到峰值(高达33.8 kg N ha−1),而干旱年则导致最大挥发(65.5 kg ha−1)。MZ2需要增加45%的灌溉才能达到MZ1的产量,这反映了土壤的水分限制。适度的MAD灌溉(50%)减少了总氮损失,而不影响产量。意义本研究表明,将空间场变异与长期气候和灌溉情景相结合对于诊断氮素低效和优化氮素利用至关重要。机械建模提供了一种可扩展的决策支持工具,用于设计适合异质生产系统的适应性营养和水管理策略。
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.