Advances in animal traceability systems: A systematic review of technologies, benefits, and challenges

IF 3.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Scientific African Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03117
Tshepiso Larona Mokgetse, Hlomani Hlomani, Tshiamo Sigwele
{"title":"Advances in animal traceability systems: A systematic review of technologies, benefits, and challenges","authors":"Tshepiso Larona Mokgetse,&nbsp;Hlomani Hlomani,&nbsp;Tshiamo Sigwele","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is a common course that many families’ livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa are most importantly dependent on agriculture, especially livestock. To that end, it is estimated that the worldwide population of cattle is around 1.3 billion. However, animal disease outbreaks have caused many problems for economies, livelihoods, and communities. Therefore, this prevalent danger from livestock infectious diseases would cripple economies, not to mention that it would destabilize food security for affected communities. Given the impact of such outbreaks, measures must therefore be put in place to manage cattle activities to ensure the best profits and safety measures of livestock are reached. Animal traceability technologies have been introduced as measures for some of the livestock problems identified. A systematic literature review of animal traceability technologies is conducted following the process: 1) Planning by formulating research questions, 2) Article selection process from databases such as Science Direct and IEEE between 2006 and 2025, 3) Meta-analysis and data extraction of the 50 selected articles 4) Write-up of the results. A novel classification framework for animal traceability technologies is developed that goes beyond traditional technology-centric reviews. The integrated conceptual framework categorises traceability innovations across four complementary dimensions: systems, frameworks, benefits, and challenges. From the results, the commonly used technology is the Radio Frequency Identification at 38.4 %, - which is showing promise but needs improvement. It is also evident from the literature that researchers combine Radio Frequency Identification with other technologies like Machine learning – 15.4 % and Blockchain – 7.7 %. It was evident that a lack of research on stakeholder experiences and perspectives is greatly overlooked, such as regulators, farmers, the government, and consumers. The review provides a clearer understanding of how different technologies interact within traceability ecosystems, highlighting gaps among technological potential and practical adoptions, offering actionable foundation for improved systems design and cross-sector decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article e03117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625005861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a common course that many families’ livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa are most importantly dependent on agriculture, especially livestock. To that end, it is estimated that the worldwide population of cattle is around 1.3 billion. However, animal disease outbreaks have caused many problems for economies, livelihoods, and communities. Therefore, this prevalent danger from livestock infectious diseases would cripple economies, not to mention that it would destabilize food security for affected communities. Given the impact of such outbreaks, measures must therefore be put in place to manage cattle activities to ensure the best profits and safety measures of livestock are reached. Animal traceability technologies have been introduced as measures for some of the livestock problems identified. A systematic literature review of animal traceability technologies is conducted following the process: 1) Planning by formulating research questions, 2) Article selection process from databases such as Science Direct and IEEE between 2006 and 2025, 3) Meta-analysis and data extraction of the 50 selected articles 4) Write-up of the results. A novel classification framework for animal traceability technologies is developed that goes beyond traditional technology-centric reviews. The integrated conceptual framework categorises traceability innovations across four complementary dimensions: systems, frameworks, benefits, and challenges. From the results, the commonly used technology is the Radio Frequency Identification at 38.4 %, - which is showing promise but needs improvement. It is also evident from the literature that researchers combine Radio Frequency Identification with other technologies like Machine learning – 15.4 % and Blockchain – 7.7 %. It was evident that a lack of research on stakeholder experiences and perspectives is greatly overlooked, such as regulators, farmers, the government, and consumers. The review provides a clearer understanding of how different technologies interact within traceability ecosystems, highlighting gaps among technological potential and practical adoptions, offering actionable foundation for improved systems design and cross-sector decision-making.
动物可追溯系统的进展:对技术、利益和挑战的系统回顾
撒哈拉以南非洲许多家庭的生计主要依赖农业,特别是畜牧业,这是一个普遍现象。为此,据估计,全世界牛的数量约为13亿。然而,动物疾病暴发给经济、生计和社区造成了许多问题。因此,牲畜传染病的这种普遍危险将削弱经济,更不用说它将破坏受影响社区的粮食安全。鉴于这种疫情的影响,因此必须采取措施管理养牛活动,以确保达到最佳利润和牲畜安全措施。动物可追溯性技术已被引入,作为已确定的一些牲畜问题的措施。对动物可追溯技术进行系统的文献综述:1)制定研究问题进行规划;2)2006 - 2025年间从Science Direct和IEEE等数据库中选择文章;3)对50篇入选文章进行meta分析和数据提取;4)对结果进行总结。开发了一种新的动物可追溯性技术分类框架,超越了传统的以技术为中心的审查。集成的概念框架将可追溯性创新分为四个互补的维度:系统、框架、利益和挑战。从结果来看,常用的技术是射频识别技术(38.4%),这是有希望的,但需要改进。从文献中也可以明显看出,研究人员将射频识别与其他技术相结合,如机器学习(15.4%)和区块链(7.7%)。很明显,对监管机构、农民、政府和消费者等利益相关者的经验和观点缺乏研究,这一点被大大忽视了。该审查提供了对可追溯性生态系统中不同技术如何相互作用的更清晰理解,突出了技术潜力和实际采用之间的差距,为改进系统设计和跨部门决策提供了可操作的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书