Effects of grassland management on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages and availability as prey for farmland birds

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Basic and Applied Ecology Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.baae.2025.11.006
Anne Pieter Jansma , Henry Kuipers , Jeroen Breidenbach , Nyncke Hoekstra , Nick van Eekeren , Hans de Kroon , Astrid Manhoudt
{"title":"Effects of grassland management on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages and availability as prey for farmland birds","authors":"Anne Pieter Jansma ,&nbsp;Henry Kuipers ,&nbsp;Jeroen Breidenbach ,&nbsp;Nyncke Hoekstra ,&nbsp;Nick van Eekeren ,&nbsp;Hans de Kroon ,&nbsp;Astrid Manhoudt","doi":"10.1016/j.baae.2025.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) are an abundant surface-active arthropod family in agricultural systems, serving as an important food source for several insectivorous farmland birds in the breeding season. This study compares ground beetle assemblages, from the perspective as food source for farmland birds, in intensively managed (IM) and extensively managed (EM) grasslands. Ground beetles were sampled over two years (2017, 2019) using pitfall traps in ten intensively managed and ten extensively managed grasslands across five farms in the clay-peat district of Friesland, the Netherlands. We investigated the effect of management type on ground beetle assemblages and examined differences in species traits body length (&lt;4 mm; 4–8 mm; 8–12 mm and &gt;12 mm) and diel activity (nocturnal, diurnal). Ground beetle numbers were higher in IM fields, but there were pronounced differences between IM and EM grasslands regarding body size and diel activity. Diurnal ground beetles sized 4–12 mm were more abundant and species-rich in EM fields, while large nocturnal ground beetles (&gt;12 mm) were more numerous in IM grasslands. IM grasslands were dominated by a few large-bodied species (e.g. <em>Pterostichus melanarius</em>), whereas EM grasslands supported a more diverse community. We conclude that extensively managed AES grasslands support a more diverse ground beetle assemblage, with a higher abundance of ground beetles within the optimal prey size range (4–12 mm) and activity period for most farmland birds. This potentially improves ground beetle availability as prey item for farmland birds during the breeding season. Our study provides empirical support for policies such as AES that provide financial incentives for biodiversity-friendly extensive farmland management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8708,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Ecology","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179125000970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) are an abundant surface-active arthropod family in agricultural systems, serving as an important food source for several insectivorous farmland birds in the breeding season. This study compares ground beetle assemblages, from the perspective as food source for farmland birds, in intensively managed (IM) and extensively managed (EM) grasslands. Ground beetles were sampled over two years (2017, 2019) using pitfall traps in ten intensively managed and ten extensively managed grasslands across five farms in the clay-peat district of Friesland, the Netherlands. We investigated the effect of management type on ground beetle assemblages and examined differences in species traits body length (<4 mm; 4–8 mm; 8–12 mm and >12 mm) and diel activity (nocturnal, diurnal). Ground beetle numbers were higher in IM fields, but there were pronounced differences between IM and EM grasslands regarding body size and diel activity. Diurnal ground beetles sized 4–12 mm were more abundant and species-rich in EM fields, while large nocturnal ground beetles (>12 mm) were more numerous in IM grasslands. IM grasslands were dominated by a few large-bodied species (e.g. Pterostichus melanarius), whereas EM grasslands supported a more diverse community. We conclude that extensively managed AES grasslands support a more diverse ground beetle assemblage, with a higher abundance of ground beetles within the optimal prey size range (4–12 mm) and activity period for most farmland birds. This potentially improves ground beetle availability as prey item for farmland birds during the breeding season. Our study provides empirical support for policies such as AES that provide financial incentives for biodiversity-friendly extensive farmland management.
草地管理对地面甲虫(鞘翅目:步甲科)数量和作为农田鸟类猎物的有效性的影响
地甲虫(鞘翅目:步甲科)是农业系统中丰富的地表活动节肢动物科,在繁殖季节是几种食虫农田鸟类的重要食物来源。本研究从集约管理(IM)和广泛管理(EM)草地作为农田鸟类食物来源的角度比较了地面甲虫组合。在两年(2017年和2019年)的时间里,在荷兰弗里斯兰泥炭区五个农场的十个集约化管理和十个广泛管理的草原上,使用陷阱对地面甲虫进行了取样。研究了不同管理方式对地面甲虫群落的影响,并分析了物种性状、体长(4毫米、4 - 8毫米、8-12毫米和12毫米)和昼夜活动(夜间、日间)的差异。禾场地甲虫数量较高,但禾场地甲虫的体型和活力在禾场地甲虫与禾场地甲虫之间存在显著差异。4 ~ 12 mm大小的昼行性地甲虫在EM地区数量较多,种类也较多,而12 mm大小的大型夜行性地甲虫在EM地区数量较多。IM草地以少数大型物种(如黑斑翼虎)为主,EM草地则支持更多样化的群落。我们得出结论,广泛管理的AES草地支持更多样化的地面甲虫组合,在大多数农田鸟类的最佳猎物大小范围(4-12 mm)和活动时间内,地面甲虫的丰度更高。这可能会提高地面甲虫在繁殖季节作为农田鸟类猎物的可用性。我们的研究为AES等政策提供了实证支持,这些政策为生物多样性友好型粗放型农田管理提供了财政激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Basic and Applied Ecology
Basic and Applied Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
10.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Applied Ecology provides a forum in which significant advances and ideas can be rapidly communicated to a wide audience. Basic and Applied Ecology publishes original contributions, perspectives and reviews from all areas of basic and applied ecology. Ecologists from all countries are invited to publish ecological research of international interest in its pages. There is no bias with regard to taxon or geographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书