Rocio Rodriguez Capilla , Aislinn M. Hurley , Karthik Kumaravelu , Jennifer J. Peters , Hui-Jie Lee , Dennis A. Turner , Warren M. Grill , Stephen L. Schmidt
{"title":"Effect of frequency on dual target deep brain stimulation","authors":"Rocio Rodriguez Capilla , Aislinn M. Hurley , Karthik Kumaravelu , Jennifer J. Peters , Hui-Jie Lee , Dennis A. Turner , Warren M. Grill , Stephen L. Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2111467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deep brain stimulation reduces the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Dual target deep brain stimulation (DT DBS) may better reduce symptoms and minimize side effects than single target, but the optimal parameters of DT DBS are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To quantify the frequency response of DT DBS on bradykinesia and beta oscillations, and to explore intrahemispheric pulse delay shifts as a means to reduce total energy delivered.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied DT DBS using the Summit RC + S in six participants with PD, varying DBS frequency. We further examined the effects of frequency in a biophysical model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DT DBS at 50 Hz was effective at reducing bradykinesia, whereas increasing DT DBS frequency up to 125 Hz also led to significantly lower beta power. This frequency effect on beta power was replicated in a biophysical model. The model suggested that 22 Hz DT DBS, with an intrahemispheric delay of 40 ms, can reduce beta power by 87 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This exploratory study (n = 6) suggests that 125 Hz DT DBS best reduced bradykinesia. However, low frequency DBS with an appropriate intrahemispheric delay could also improve symptom relief.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Both 125 Hz and tailored low-frequency DT DBS may achieve equivalent symptomatic control of PD symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 2111467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725013197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Deep brain stimulation reduces the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Dual target deep brain stimulation (DT DBS) may better reduce symptoms and minimize side effects than single target, but the optimal parameters of DT DBS are unknown.
Objective
To quantify the frequency response of DT DBS on bradykinesia and beta oscillations, and to explore intrahemispheric pulse delay shifts as a means to reduce total energy delivered.
Methods
We applied DT DBS using the Summit RC + S in six participants with PD, varying DBS frequency. We further examined the effects of frequency in a biophysical model.
Results
DT DBS at 50 Hz was effective at reducing bradykinesia, whereas increasing DT DBS frequency up to 125 Hz also led to significantly lower beta power. This frequency effect on beta power was replicated in a biophysical model. The model suggested that 22 Hz DT DBS, with an intrahemispheric delay of 40 ms, can reduce beta power by 87 %.
Conclusion
This exploratory study (n = 6) suggests that 125 Hz DT DBS best reduced bradykinesia. However, low frequency DBS with an appropriate intrahemispheric delay could also improve symptom relief.
Significance
Both 125 Hz and tailored low-frequency DT DBS may achieve equivalent symptomatic control of PD symptoms.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.