Assessing policies for health impact and cost reduction from PM2.5 formation

IF 12.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108265
Maywalin Jumsai Na Ayudhya , Shabbir H. Gheewala , Vladimir Strezov , Jitti Mungkalasiri , Sirima Panyametheekul , Ekbordin Winijkul , Trakarn Prapaspongsa
{"title":"Assessing policies for health impact and cost reduction from PM2.5 formation","authors":"Maywalin Jumsai Na Ayudhya ,&nbsp;Shabbir H. Gheewala ,&nbsp;Vladimir Strezov ,&nbsp;Jitti Mungkalasiri ,&nbsp;Sirima Panyametheekul ,&nbsp;Ekbordin Winijkul ,&nbsp;Trakarn Prapaspongsa","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) poses significant health and economic burdens, particularly in developing regions, such as Southeast Asia. This study assesses the health impacts and economic costs of PM<sub>2.5</sub> formation in Thailand and evaluates mitigation policies to reduce these effects by 2037. Analyses at the city to national level examine major emission sources, including road transport, industry, power generation, household activities, open burning of agricultural waste, livestock, fertilizer application, and forest fires. Without intervention, health impacts are projected to increase by 22 % from 2022 levels, reaching 403,373 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) annually and resulting in an economic burden of 301 billion Thai Baht (THB) per year. Scenario analysis identifies the best integrated mitigation strategy, which includes <em>E</em>-Buses, reducing energy consumption in industry and power generation, banning agricultural residue open burning, and decreasing forest fire hotspots. This strategy could reduce health impacts by up to 70 % and could yield an economic benefit of approximately 211 billion THB annually. A ban on agricultural burning is identified as one of the most effective interventions, potentially eliminating 38 % of the health burden in Thailand. Findings highlight the urgency of comprehensive, multi-sectoral policies to mitigate PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution, with emphasis on agricultural waste management and enhanced emission controls. These insights provide a framework for other Southeast Asian countries facing similar air pollution challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 108265"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525004627","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) poses significant health and economic burdens, particularly in developing regions, such as Southeast Asia. This study assesses the health impacts and economic costs of PM2.5 formation in Thailand and evaluates mitigation policies to reduce these effects by 2037. Analyses at the city to national level examine major emission sources, including road transport, industry, power generation, household activities, open burning of agricultural waste, livestock, fertilizer application, and forest fires. Without intervention, health impacts are projected to increase by 22 % from 2022 levels, reaching 403,373 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) annually and resulting in an economic burden of 301 billion Thai Baht (THB) per year. Scenario analysis identifies the best integrated mitigation strategy, which includes E-Buses, reducing energy consumption in industry and power generation, banning agricultural residue open burning, and decreasing forest fire hotspots. This strategy could reduce health impacts by up to 70 % and could yield an economic benefit of approximately 211 billion THB annually. A ban on agricultural burning is identified as one of the most effective interventions, potentially eliminating 38 % of the health burden in Thailand. Findings highlight the urgency of comprehensive, multi-sectoral policies to mitigate PM2.5 pollution, with emphasis on agricultural waste management and enhanced emission controls. These insights provide a framework for other Southeast Asian countries facing similar air pollution challenges.

Abstract Image

评估PM2.5形成对健康的影响和降低成本的政策
细颗粒物(PM2.5)造成严重的健康和经济负担,特别是在东南亚等发展中地区。本研究评估了泰国PM2.5形成的健康影响和经济成本,并评估了到2037年减少这些影响的缓解政策。从城市到国家层面的分析检查了主要的排放源,包括道路运输、工业、发电、家庭活动、露天焚烧农业废弃物、牲畜、肥料施用和森林火灾。如果不进行干预,预计健康影响将比2022年的水平增加22%,达到每年403,373个残疾调整生命年,并导致每年3010亿泰铢的经济负担。情景分析确定了最佳综合缓解战略,其中包括电动客车、减少工业和发电能耗、禁止露天焚烧农业剩余物以及减少森林火灾热点。这一战略可将对健康的影响减少至多70%,每年可产生约2110亿泰铢的经济效益。禁止农业焚烧被确定为最有效的干预措施之一,有可能消除泰国38%的卫生负担。研究结果强调,迫切需要采取全面的多部门政策来减轻PM2.5污染,重点是农业废物管理和加强排放控制。这些见解为其他面临类似空气污染挑战的东南亚国家提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书