Toward a transparent life cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems: Addressing regulatory and methodological challenges

IF 12.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108290
Ilham Ihoume , Michiel van Noord , André Augusto
{"title":"Toward a transparent life cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems: Addressing regulatory and methodological challenges","authors":"Ilham Ihoume ,&nbsp;Michiel van Noord ,&nbsp;André Augusto","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Photovoltaic (PV) systems are central to global decarbonization, but their assessed environmental impacts vary due to inconsistencies in life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies. These differences hinder comparability and the development of a transparent sustainability framework. To address this issue, this review systematically synthesizes PV LCA studies across five continents. The analysis highlights variations in system boundaries, functional units, data quality, and regulatory frameworks, revealing that methodological coherence is strongly shaped by regional policy and data infrastructure. Europe, supported by stringent regulations and localized inventories, demonstrates high methodological alignment. In contrast, Africa and Latin America face major data gaps, with over 90 % of studies relying on non local inventories, creating uncertainty in the results. Building on these findings, this study proposes key harmonization strategies, including enhanced transparency, the adoption of standardized guidelines such as IEA PVPS Task 12, and the targeted development of regional life cycle inventory databases. These measures provide policymakers, industry, and researchers with a practical framework to strengthen the reliability and comparability of PV sustainability assessments, supporting solar energy's role in a low carbon future. Future research should prioritize the expansion of localized datasets and the integration of dynamic LCA approaches to capture rapid technological evolution and circular economy principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 108290"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525004871","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) systems are central to global decarbonization, but their assessed environmental impacts vary due to inconsistencies in life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies. These differences hinder comparability and the development of a transparent sustainability framework. To address this issue, this review systematically synthesizes PV LCA studies across five continents. The analysis highlights variations in system boundaries, functional units, data quality, and regulatory frameworks, revealing that methodological coherence is strongly shaped by regional policy and data infrastructure. Europe, supported by stringent regulations and localized inventories, demonstrates high methodological alignment. In contrast, Africa and Latin America face major data gaps, with over 90 % of studies relying on non local inventories, creating uncertainty in the results. Building on these findings, this study proposes key harmonization strategies, including enhanced transparency, the adoption of standardized guidelines such as IEA PVPS Task 12, and the targeted development of regional life cycle inventory databases. These measures provide policymakers, industry, and researchers with a practical framework to strengthen the reliability and comparability of PV sustainability assessments, supporting solar energy's role in a low carbon future. Future research should prioritize the expansion of localized datasets and the integration of dynamic LCA approaches to capture rapid technological evolution and circular economy principles.
迈向透明的光伏系统生命周期评估:解决监管和方法上的挑战
光伏(PV)系统是全球脱碳的核心,但由于生命周期评估(LCA)方法的不一致性,其评估的环境影响各不相同。这些差异阻碍了可比性和透明可持续性框架的发展。为了解决这一问题,本文系统地综合了五大洲的PV - LCA研究。分析强调了系统边界、功能单元、数据质量和监管框架的差异,揭示了方法一致性在很大程度上受到区域政策和数据基础设施的影响。欧洲在严格的法规和本地化库存的支持下,显示出高度的方法一致性。相比之下,非洲和拉丁美洲面临着重大的数据缺口,超过90%的研究依赖于非当地的库存,造成了结果的不确定性。在这些发现的基础上,本研究提出了关键的协调策略,包括提高透明度,采用标准化指南,如IEA PVPS任务12,以及有针对性地开发区域生命周期清单数据库。这些措施为政策制定者、行业和研究人员提供了一个实用的框架,以加强光伏可持续性评估的可靠性和可比性,支持太阳能在低碳未来中的作用。未来的研究应优先考虑本地化数据集的扩展和动态LCA方法的整合,以捕捉快速的技术演变和循环经济原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书